Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2021 / The historical phonology of Old English: a critical review

The historical phonology of Old English: a critical review

Paper · 2021 · Arjen Versloot

Summary

Versloot challenges the "Standard Theory" (ST) of pre-Old English sound change. This chronology goes back to Luick (1914–40) and was refined by Campbell, Brunner, Fulk, Stiles, Hogg and Ringe. The paper does not propose a full replacement. It audits the theory on methodological grounds, using Hogg's grammar as the main reference, checking it against the earliest Anglian material (the Épinal and Erfurt Glossaries and early Northumbrian fragments) and against early runic inscriptions.

The audit finds several problems:

  • The ST packs long chains of changes into roughly 450–700 CE, and some rules exist only to undo earlier ones: retraction reverses fronting, and smoothing reverses breaking.
  • None of these intermediate stages is confirmed by runes.
  • Inconvenient forms are routinely explained away as scribal error or dialect mixing.
  • The ST does not align with Old Frisian, a closely related language.

The author concludes that the accumulated inconsistencies make the theory untenable. A companion article offers an alternative chronology. The argument matters because the ST is presented as settled in every Old English handbook.

Key points

  • The ST compresses up to five successive stages per form into about 250 years. Kortlandt, reading Fulk (1998), counted vowels backing and fronting in alternation across stages 1 to 11.
  • The ST inverts a basic expectation: a later-attested variety should be further from the proto-language. Yet West Saxon, recorded about 200 years after the Anglian texts, is assigned fewer pre-historic changes than the older Anglian dialects.
  • Campbell (1977, §246) held that these changes can be dated only by theoretical reasoning, not from texts. Versloot calls this position unfalsifiable.
  • Specific weaknesses:
    • The general fronting of PGmc *a is unproven and is doubtful given the raïhan inscription.
    • The key forms ēa, slēan and nēowest have simpler explanations, and the 8th-century form neweste is overlooked.
    • Anglian smoothing is probably an artefact of the reconstruction.
  • Under the author's alternative order, breaking comes after i-mutation. This order derives EpGl feormat from PGmc *farmjan-, which the ST cannot do.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. Treat a rule whose only role is to cancel an earlier rule as a warning sign, not as part of the explanation.
  • I2. Before trusting a derivation, test it against a simple prior expectation, such as "later varieties show more changes"; an inverted result points to a modelling error.
  • I3. Count how many attested counterexamples a theory dismisses as noise, and treat a high count as evidence against the theory itself.
  • I4. Intermediate stages that no evidence attests should be minimised, and every posited step should carry a cost.
  • I5. Anchor the reconstruction in the oldest primary sources rather than in later, better-documented varieties.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (learn): Self-induced repair rules could be scanned for pairs that undo each other, and each pair replaced by one direct rule or the cause traced back to the earlier rule.
  • I2 (learn): Evaluation could include such expected-direction checks as extra negative controls; for example, a noisier input should never yield a more confident parse.
  • I3 (learn): When witness parsers disagree in silver data, log every case written off as annotator error, and review a rule whenever its exceptions pile up.
  • I4 (world): Any state or event that the text world infers without textual support could be marked as unattested, so that answers built on long unsupported chains are given lower confidence.
  • I5 (tree): When converting UD dialects or mixing treebanks, prefer annotations closest to the source scheme as the reference, and avoid inferring conventions backwards from heavily converted data.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

🎓University of AmsterdamAmsterdam · Netherlands89 works · 81,337 citations

📚 Shelves 4The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Arts and Humanities · 9,296 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 9,206 worksPsychology · 798 worksExperimental and Cognitive Psychology · 463 works

🧭 Topics 2Research subjects and languages the work is about.English · 1,373 worksHistorical linguistics & language change · 159 works

Cite

Cite as Arjen Versloot. 2021. The historical phonology of Old English: a critical review. Papers in Historical Phonology 6.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.2218/pihph.6.2021.6690

@inproceedings{versloot2021historical,
  title = {{The historical phonology of Old English: a critical review}},
  author = {Arjen Versloot},
  booktitle = {Papers in Historical Phonology 6},
  year = {2021},
  doi = {10.2218/pihph.6.2021.6690},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2218/pihph.6.2021.6690}
}

References

56 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. RuneS: Home. RUNES. https://www.runesdb.de/ Ball, Christopher & Patrick Stiles. 1983. The derivation of Old English Geolu 'yellow' and the relative chronology of smoothing and back-mutation. Anglia 101. 5–28. ↗
  2. Bremmer Jr, Rolf H. 2009. An introduction to Old Frisian: History, grammar, reader, glossary. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. find
  3. Campbell, Alistair. 1977. Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press. find
  4. Chadwick, H. Munro. 1889. Studies in Old English. London: Cambridge University Press. find
  5. Colleran, Rebecca A.B. 2016. Keeping it in the family: disentangling contact and inheritance in closely related languages. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. find
  6. DeCamp, David. 1958. The genesis of the Old English dialects: a new hypothesis. Language 34(2). 232–244. ↗
  7. Dyvik, Helge. 1978. Breaking in Old Norse and related languages: A reassessment of the phonological conditions. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 93. 1–37. find
  8. Fulk, Robert D. 1998. The chronology of Anglo-Frisian sound changes. In Rolf H. Bremmer Jr, Thomas Stanley Baker Johnston & Oebele Vries (eds.), Approaches to Old Frisian Philology (Amsterdamer Beiträge Zur Älteren Germanistik 49), 139–154. Amsterdam/ Atlanta GA: Rodopi. Healey, Antonette diPaolo. 2004. Dictionary of Old English, Web Corpus. Web Corpus — The Dictionary of Old English. http://www.doe.utoronto.ca/pages/pub/web-corpus.html. ↗
  9. Herren, Michael W, David W. Porter & Hans Sauer. 2020. The Épinal-Erfurt Glossary Project. https://www.doe.utoronto.ca/epinal-erfurt/index.html ↗
  10. Higham, Nicholas J & Martin J Ryan. 2015. The Anglo-Saxon world. New Haven / London: Yale University Press. find
  11. Hines, John. 2006. The early runic inscriptions from Kent and the problem of legibility. In Alfred Bammesberger & Gabriele Waxenberger (eds.), Das Fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen: Akten der Tagung in Eichstätt vom 20. bis 24. Juli 2003 (Ergänzungsbände Zum Reallexikon Der Germanischen Altertumskunde 51), 188–208. Berlin / New York, N.Y: Walter de Gruyter. ↗
  12. Hines, John & Charlotte Behr. 2019. Wer kommt im 4. und 5. Jahrhundert vom Kontinent nach Britannien, ab wann und warum? In Babette Ludowici (ed.), Saxones: Niedersächsische The historical phonology of Old English: a critical review Landesausstellung 2019: Landesmuseum Hannover und im Braunschweigischen Landesmuseum, 141–153. Darmstadt: Theiss. find
  13. Hoekstra, Jarich & Geart Tigchelaar. 2014. kenna — kanna. The e/a-variation in Old Frisian and its Modern Frisian reflexes. In Rolf H. Bremmer Jr, Stephen Laker & Oebele Vries (eds.), Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik Directions for Old Frisian Philology (73). 185–200. find
  14. Hogg, Richard M. 1988. On the impossibility of Old English dialectology. In Dieter Kastovsky, Gero Bauer & Jacek Fisiak (eds.), Luick revisited: papers read at the Luick-Symposium at Schloss Liechtenstein, 183–203. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. find
  15. Hogg, Richard M. [1992] 2011. A grammar of Old English, volume 1: Phonology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. find
  16. Hogg, Richard M & Robert D. Fulk. 2011. A grammar of Old English, volume 2: Morphology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. find
  17. Howell, Robert B. 1991. Old English breaking and its Germanic analogues (Linguistische Arbeiten 253). Tübingen: Niemeyer. find
  18. Howell, Robert B. & Wicka Katerina Somers. 2008. A phonetic account of Anglian smoothing. Folia Linguistica Historica 41 (Historica vol. 28, 1–2). 187–214. ↗
  19. Imer, Lisbeth M. 2011. The oldest runic monuments in the North: dating and distribution. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 62/63(1/2). 169–212. ↗
  20. König, Werner. 2001. Dtv-Atlas Deutsche Sprache. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag. find
  21. Kortlandt, Frederik. 1999. The origin of the Old English dialects revisited. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur Älteren Germanistik 51. 45–51. ↗
  22. Kortlandt, Frederik. 2008. Anglo-Frisian. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 54/55. 265–278. find
  23. Krupatkin, Yakov B. 1970. From Germanic to English and Frisian. Us Wurk 19(1/4). 49–71. find
  24. Kuhn, Hans. 1955. Zur Gliederung der germanischen Sprachen. Zeitschrift für deutsches Altertum und deutsche Literatur 86. 1–47. find
  25. Kuhn, Sherman M. 1939. The Dialect of the Corpus Glossary. PMLA 54(1). 1–19. ↗
  26. Laker, Stephen. 2019. Celtic influence on Old English vowels: a review of the phonological and phonetic evidence. English Language and Linguistics English Language and Linguistics 23. 591 - 620. ↗
  27. Looijenga, Tineke. 2003. Texts & contexts of the oldest Runic inscriptions. Leiden / Boston: Brill. Luick, Karl. 1914–40. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Stuttgart: Bernhard Tauchnitz. ↗
  28. Arjen Versloot Nedoma, Robert. 2016. The personal names on the Loveden Hill urn and the Watchfield case fitting: Possibilities and restrictions resulting from the sound system. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 69(1). 3–37. ↗
  29. Nicolay, Johan. 2005. Nieuwe bewoners van het terpengebied en hun rol bij de opkomst van Fries koningschap: de betekenis van gouden bracteaten en bracteaatachtige hangers uit Friesland (vijfde-zevende eeuw na Chr.). De Vrije Fries 85. 37–103. find
  30. Nicolay, Johan. 2017. Power and Identity in the Southern North Sea Area: the Migration and Merovingian Periods. In Nelleke IJssenagger & John Hines (eds.), Frisians and their North Sea Neighbours, from the fifth century to the viking age, 75–92. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer. ↗
  31. Nielsen, Hans Frede. 1985. Old English and the continental Germanic languages: A survey of morphological and phonological interrelations (Innsbrucker Beiträge Zur Sprachwissenschaft 33). 2nd edn. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck. find
  32. Nielsen, Hans Frede. 1998. The continental backgrounds of English and its insular development until 1154. Odense; Portland, OR: Odense University Press. ↗
  33. Nielsen, Hans Frede. 2000. The early runic language of Scandinavia: studies in Germanic dialect geography. Heidelberg: C. Winter. find
  34. Nielsen, Hans Frede. 2010. The early runic language of Scandinavia: Proto-Norse or North-West Germanic? In John Ole Askedal, Harald Bjorvand, James E Knirk & Otto Erlend Nordgreen (eds.), Zentrale Probleme bei der Erforschung der älteren Runen: Akten einer internationalen Tagung an der Norwegischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 95–114. Frankfurt am Main: Lang. find
  35. Nielsen, Hans Frede. 2015. The vowel systems of Old English, Old Norse and Old High German compared. In John Ole Askedal & Hans Frede Nielsen (eds.), Early Germanic languages in contact, 261–276. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins. ↗
  36. Nieuwhof, Annet. 2016. De lege vierde eeuw. In Annet Nieuwhof (ed.), Van Wierhuizen tot Achlum honderd jaar archeologisch onderzoek in Terpen en Wierden, 83–98. Groningen: Vereniging voor Terpenonderzoek. find
  37. Page, Ray I. 1994. Runes in East Anglia. In James E Knirk (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Runes and Runic Inscriptions: Grindaheim, Norway, 8-12 August 1990, 105–117. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet. Institutionen för nordiska språk. find
  38. Pheifer, Joseph John Michael Donovan. 1974. Old English glosses in the Épinal-Erfurt glossary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. find
  39. Rem, Margrit. 2003. De taal van de klerken uit de Hollandse grafelijke kanselarij (1300–1340): naar een lokaliseringsprocedure voor het The historical phonology of Old English: a critical review veertiende-eeuws Middelnederlands. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek VU. find
  40. Ringe, Don & Ann Taylor. 2014. A linguistic history of English. Volume II: the Development of Old English. New York: Oxford University Press. Schee, Sanne J. F van der. 2015. Breaking of /æ_rC/ in Early Old English: Personal Names and Place-Names in Latin Charters and Manuscripts of Bede’s Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum. Anglia 133(2). 225–256. find
  41. Schrijver, Peter. 2014. Language contact and the origins of the Germanic languages (Routledge Studies in Linguistics 13). New York: Taylor and Francis. find
  42. Schwarz, E. 1951. Goten, Nordgermanen, Angelsachsen. Studien zur Ausgliederung der germanischen Sprachen. Bern / München: Francke / Leo Lehnen. find
  43. Siebs, Theodor. 1889. Zur Geschichte der englisch-friesischen Sprache. Halle a/d Saale: Max Niemeyer. find
  44. Sprockel, Cornelis. 1965. The language of the Parker Chronicle. Volume I, Phonology and Accidence. Dordrecht: Springer. ↗
  45. Stiles, Patrick. 1995. Remarks on the 'Anglo-Frisian' thesis. In Föhrer Symposium zur Friesische Philologie, Volkert F Faltings, Alastair Walker & Ommo Wilts (eds.), NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution, 177–220. [Odense]: Odense University Press. ↗
  46. Stiles, Patrick. 2013. The Pan-West Germanic isoglosses and the subrelationships of West Germanic to other branches. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 66(1). 5–38. ↗
  47. Tiefenbach, Heinrich. 2010. Altsächsisches Handwörterbuch = A concise Old Saxon dictionary. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. find
  48. Toon, Thomas E. 1987. Old English dialects: what’s to explain; what’s an explanation? In Willem Koopman, Frederike van der Leek, Olga Fischer & Roger Eaton (eds.), Explanation and linguistic change, 275–293. Amsterdam: Benjamins. find
  49. Toon, Thomas E. 1992. Chapter 6: Old English Dialects. In Richard M Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume 1, The beginnings to 1066, 409–451. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  50. Versloot, Arjen Pieter. 2014. Methodological reflections on the emergence of Old Frisian. In Hans Frede Nielsen & Patrick Stiles (eds.). NOWELE: Unity and Diversity in West Germanic III 67(1). 23–49. ↗
  51. Versloot, Arjen Pieter. 2017. Proto-Germanic ai in North and West Germanic. Folia Linguistica 51(s38). 281–324. find
  52. Versloot, Arjen Pieter. 2019. Reduction of unstressed vowels in Proto-Frisian and the Germanic 'Auslautgesetze.' NOWELE : North-Western European Language Evolution 72(1). 79–98. Arjen Versloot Versloot, Arjen Pieter. To appear. Reconstructing the historical phonology of Old English. English Language and Linguistics. find
  53. Waxenberger, Gabriele. 2011. The Old English runic inscription of the Whitby comb and modern technology. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 67(1). 69–77. ↗
  54. Waxenberger, Gabriele. 2013. The reflection of pre-Old English sound changes in pre-Old English runic inscriptions. In Hans Sauer & Gabriele Waxenberger (eds.), Recording English, researching English, transforming English, 17–64. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. find
  55. Waxenberger, Gaby. 2019. Absolute chronology of early sound changes reflected in Pre-Old English runic inscriptions. NOWELE: North-Western European language evolution 72(1). 60–77. ↗
  56. Wipf, Elisa. 1910. Die Mundart von Visperterminen im Wallis. Frauenfeld: Huber & Co. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/versloot-2021-historical-phonology-old-english-critical/