🔗 Who cites «What Goes Into a LM Acceptability Judgment? Rethinking the Impact of Frequency and Length»

8 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 2 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «What Goes Into a LM Acceptability Judgment? Rethinking the Impact of Frequency and Length»

1. Manipulating language models' training data to study syntactic constraint learning: the case of English passivizationarXiv:2407.04593Cara Su-Yi Leong, Tal Linzen2024 · 8 citations
2. Surprisal and Metaphor Novelty Judgments: Moderate Correlations and Divergent Scaling Effects Revealed by Corpus-Based and Synthetic DatasetsConference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL)Omar Momen, Emilie Sitter, Berenike Herrmann, et al.2026 · 1 citation

6 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/tjuatja-2025-what-goes-into-lm-acceptability/cited-by/