🔗 Who cites «When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific Research»

9 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 5 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific Research»

1. AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific ResearchScience China Information SciencesQiguang Chen, Mingda Yang, Libo Qin, et al.2025 · 21 citations
2. The More You Automate, the Less You See: Hidden Pitfalls of AI Scientist SystemsarXiv:2509.08713Ziming Luo, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Nihar B. Shah2025 · 11 citations
3. Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic EvaluationarXiv:2505.23824Tianmai M. Zhang, Neil F. Abernethy2025 · 7 citations
4. Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation FrameworkTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)Nils Dycke, Iryna Gurevych2026 · 5 citations
5. A Survey of AI ScientistsarXiv:2510.23045Guiyao Tie, Pan Zhou, Lichao Sun2025 · 5 citations

4 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/son-2025-ai-co-scientists-fail/cited-by/