🔗 Who cites «Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMs»

23 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 7 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMs»

1. Synthetic Socratic Debates: Examining Persona Effects on Moral Decision and Persuasion DynamicsConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Jiarui Liu, Yueqi Song, Yunze Xiao, et al.2025 · 9 citations
2. DEBATE, TRAIN, EVOLVE: Self-Evolution of Language Model ReasoningConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Gaurav Srivastava, Zhenyu Bi, Meng Lu, et al.2025 · 7 citations
3. From Belief Entrenchment to Robust Reasoning in LLM AgentsTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)Jihwan Oh, Minchan Jeong, Jongwoo Ko, et al.2026 · 2 citations
4. Agentic Oversight via Dialectic ReasoningAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Leonardo Ranaldi, Federico Ranaldi2026
5. Identifying Collective Intelligence Factor in LLM Agent Groups for Generalizable Multi-Agent System DesignFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsZhilun Zhou, Zihan Liu, Jiahe Liu, et al.2026
6. LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Clinical Workflows: A Survey of AI HospitalsAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Zonghai Yao, Hong yu2026
7. Thesis Proposal: Intentional Inference for Insight GenerationAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Kristýna Onderková2026

16 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/smit-2023-should-going-mad-look/cited-by/