Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2026 / Entity Linking for Faroese Using Large Language Models with Web Search

Entity Linking for Faroese Using Large Language Models with Web Search

Paper · 2026 · Annika Simonsen, Iben Nyholm Debess and Hafsteinn Einarsson

Summary

This work tackles entity linking (EL) for Faroese, a North Germanic language with roughly 70,000 speakers that had no prior EL research or dedicated candidate-generation and disambiguation tools. Instead of a classic multi-stage pipeline, the authors use GPT-5 with built-in web search, accessed through OpenRouter, in a zero-shot setting. The model receives a news text and its already-identified named entities, then returns a Wikipedia page for each one or an empty value. Lookup proceeds in a cascade of three separate calls: Faroese Wikipedia first, then English Wikipedia, then any language edition. A link is accepted only if its page has a Wikidata ID. Mentions come from the existing Faroese NER dataset built on Sosialurin news. Two human annotators checked a 1,010-example subset, and the system reached about 87% precision and recall, well above a plain Wikipedia API search. This sets the first Faroese EL benchmark. It also suggests that LLMs with search can stand in for missing language-specific EL components in other low-resource languages.

Key points

  • Data: 3,000 examples were drawn from the Faroese named-entity recognition corpus released by Snæbjarnarson et al. (2023), yielding 5,584 entity mentions. Of these, 1,010 examples with 1,647 predictions (Person, Location, Organization, Miscellaneous) were annotated by two people. This subset and the code are released as a gold-standard dataset on GitHub (haffi112/faroese-entity-linking).
  • Overall result: Precision is 87.5% and recall 87.3%. Locations perform best (93–95% precision, 92–95% recall). Persons are hardest, with recall of only 72–83%.
  • Knowledge base use: 76.5% of produced links point to Faroese Wikipedia, even though that edition has only about 14,196 articles.
  • Baseline: A Wikipedia API search without an LLM scores F1 = 0.57–0.60.
  • Cross-model check: GPT-5, Gemini 3 Flash and GPT-5.4 Mini reach F1 between 0.74 and 0.87, so the method is not tied to one provider.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

Cite

Cite as Annika Simonsen, Iben Nyholm Debess and Hafsteinn Einarsson. 2026. Entity Linking for Faroese Using Large Language Models with Web Search. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on the Role of Resources in the Age of Large Language Models (RESOURCEFUL 2026).

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.63317/2myt23gboqw3

@inproceedings{simonsen2026entity,
  title = {{Entity Linking for Faroese Using Large Language Models with Web Search}},
  author = {Annika Simonsen, Iben Nyholm Debess and Hafsteinn Einarsson},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on the Role of Resources in the Age of Large Language Models (RESOURCEFUL 2026)},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.63317/2myt23gboqw3},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.63317/2myt23gboqw3}
}

References

34 references, 9 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774. ↗
  2. Emily M. Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ’21, page 610–623, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. ↗
  3. Marta Boscariol, Luana Bulla, Lia Draetta, Beatrice Fiumanò, Emanuele Lenzi, and Leonardo Piano. 2025. Evaluation of llms on long-tail entity linking in historical documents. ↗
  4. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Chris Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 1877–1901. Curran Associates, Inc.
  5. Jacob Cohen. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1):37–46. ↗
  6. Silviu Cucerzan. 2007. Large-scale named entity disambiguation based on Wikipedia data. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), pages 708–716, Prague, Czech Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  7. Debarghya Datta and Soumajit Pramanik. 2024. Unsupervised named entity disambiguation for low resource domains. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 14922–14928, Miami, Florida, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  8. Nicola De Cao, Ledell Wu, Kashyap Popat, Mikel Artetxe, Naman Goyal, Mikhail Plekhanov, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, Sebastian Riedel, and Fabio Petroni. 2022. Multilingual autoregressive entity linking. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:274–290. ↗
  9. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 4171–4186, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  10. Yifan Ding, Amrit Poudel, Qingkai Zeng, Tim Weninger, Balaji Veeramani, and Sanmitra Bhattacharya. 2024a. Entgpt: Entity linking with generative large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.06738. ↗
  11. Yifan Ding, Qingkai Zeng, and Tim Weninger. 2024b. ChatEL: Entity linking with chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024), pages 3086–3097, Torino, Italia. ELRA and ICCL. find
  12. Valdimar Ágúst Eggertsson, Benedikt Geir Jóhannesson, Hafsteinn Einarsson, and Hrafn Loftsson. 2023. Effective entity disambiguation in low-resource languages: A study of icelandic. find
  13. In 2023 IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), pages 318–324. find
  14. Steinunn Rut Friðriksdóttir, Valdimar Ágúst Eggertsson, Benedikt Geir Jóhannesson, Hjalti Daníelsson, Hrafn Loftsson, and Hafsteinn Einarsson. 2022. Building an Icelandic entity linking corpus. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Dataset Creation for Lower-Resourced Languages within the 13th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 27–35, Marseille, France. European Language Resources Association. ↗
  15. Xingyu Fu, Weijia Shi, Xiaodong Yu, Zian Zhao, and Dan Roth. 2020. Design challenges in low-resource cross-lingual entity linking. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 6418–6432, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  16. Alberto Garcia-Duran, Akhil Arora, and Robert West. 2022. Efficient entity candidate generation for low-resource languages. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 6429–6438, Marseille, France. European Language Resources Association. find
  17. Yuxian Gu, Li Dong, Furu Wei, and Minlie Huang. 2024. MiniLLM: Knowledge distillation of large language models. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations. find
  18. Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Chun-Liang Li, Chih-kuan Yeh, Hootan Nakhost, Yasuhisa Fujii, Alex Ratner, Ranjay Krishna, Chen-Yu Lee, and Tomas Pfister. 2023. Distilling step-by-step! outperforming larger language models with less training data and smaller model sizes. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 8003–8017, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  19. Xuhui Jiang, Yinghan Shen, Zhichao Shi, Chengjin Xu, Wei Li, Zixuan Li, Jian Guo, Huawei Shen, and Yuanzhuo Wang. 2024. Unlocking the power of large language models for entity alignment. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 7566–7583, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  20. Morteza Kamaladdini Ezzabady and Farah Benamara. 2025. Entity quality enhancement in knowledge graphs through LLM-based question answering. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Generative AI and Knowledge Graphs (GenAIK), pages 136–145, Abu Dhabi, UAE. International Committee on Computational Linguistics. find
  21. J Richard Landis and Gary G Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics, pages 159–174. find
  22. Angeliki Lazaridou, Elena Gribovskaya, Wojciech Stokowiec, and Nikolai Grigorev. 2022. Internet-augmented language models through few-shot prompting for open-domain question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05115. ↗
  23. Zhuoyan Li, Hangxiao Zhu, Zhuoran Lu, and Ming Yin. 2023. Synthetic data generation with large language models for text classification: Potential and limitations. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 10443–10461, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  24. Rumana Ferdous Munne, Md Mostafizur Rahman, and Yuji Matsumoto. 2025. Entity profile generation and reasoning with LLMs for entity alignment. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, pages 20073–20086, Suzhou, China. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  25. Reiichiro Nakano, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, Jeff Wu, Long Ouyang, Christina Kim, Christopher Hesse, Shantanu Jain, Vineet Kosaraju, William Saunders, et al. 2021. Webgpt: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09332. ↗
  26. Gerard Pons, Besim Bilalli, and Anna Queralt. 2025. Knowledge graphs for enhancing large language models in entity disambiguation. In The Semantic Web – ISWC 2024, pages 162–179, Cham. Springer Nature Switzerland. find
  27. Delip Rao, Paul McNamee, and Mark Dredze. 2013. Entity Linking: Finding Extracted Entities in a Knowledge Base, pages 93–115. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. find
  28. Vésteinn Snæbjarnarson, Annika Simonsen, Goran Glavaš, and Ivan Vulić. 2023. Transfer to a low-resource language via close relatives: The case study on Faroese. In Proceedings of the 24th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics (NoDaLiDa), pages 728–737, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands. University of Tartu Library. ↗
  29. Kushal Tatariya, Artur Kulmizev, Wessel Poelman, Esther Ploeger, Marcel Bollmann, Johannes Bjerva, Jiaming Luo, Heather Lent, and Miryam de Lhoneux. 2025. How good is your wikipedia? auditing data quality for low-resource and multilingual nlp.
  30. Daniel Vollmers, Hamada Zahera, Diego Moussallem, and Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo. 2025. Contextual augmentation for entity linking using large language models. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 8535–8545, Abu Dhabi, UAE. Association for Computational Linguistics. ↗
  31. Ledell Wu, Fabio Petroni, Martin Josifoski, Sebastian Riedel, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2020. Scalable zero-shot entity linking with dense entity retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 6397–6407, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  32. Christophe Ye and Cassie S. Mitchell. 2025. LLM as entity disambiguator for biomedical entity-linking. In Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 301–312, Vienna, Austria. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  33. Shuyan Zhou, Shruti Rijhwani, and Graham Neubig. 2019. Towards zero-resource cross-lingual entity linking. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Deep Learning Approaches for Low-Resource NLP (DeepLo 2019), pages 243–252, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  34. Özge Sevgili, Artem Shelmanov, Mikhail Arkhipov, Alexander Panchenko, and Chris Biemann. 2022. Neural entity linking: A survey of models based on deep learning. Semantic Web, 13(3):527– 570. ↗

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/simonsen-2026-entity-linking-faroese-large-language/