🔗 Who cites «Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviews»

9 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 5 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviews»

1. AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific ResearchScience China Information SciencesQiguang Chen, Mingda Yang, Libo Qin, et al.2025 · 21 citations
2. Justice in Judgment: Unveiling (Hidden) Bias in LLM-assisted Peer ReviewsFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsSai Suresh Macharla Vasu, Ivaxi Sheth, Hui-Po Wang, et al.2026 · 8 citations
3. Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation FrameworkTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)Nils Dycke, Iryna Gurevych2026 · 5 citations
4. RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback GenerationFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsSihong Wu, Yiling Ma, Yilun Zhao, et al.2026 · 2 citations
5. Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the FutureAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Sihong Wu, Owen Jiang, Yilun Zhao, et al.2026 · 1 citation

4 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/shin-2025-mind-blind-spots-focus-level/cited-by/