Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / The Limitations of Stylometry for Detecting… / cited by

Who cites «The Limitations of Stylometry for Detecting Machine-Generated Fake News»

42 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 11 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «The Limitations of Stylometry for Detecting Machine-Generated Fake News»

  1. A Survey on Automated Fact-CheckingTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)Zhijiang Guo, Michael Schlichtkrull, Andreas Vlachos2022 · 647 citations
  2. Challenges and Applications of Large Language ModelsarXiv:2307.10169Jean Kaddour, Joshua Harris, Maximilian Mozes, et al.2023 · 301 citations
  3. Red teaming ChatGPT via Jailbreaking: Bias, Robustness, Reliability and ToxicityarXiv:2301.12867Terry Yue Zhuo, Yujin Huang, Chunyang Chen, et al.2023 · 249 citations
  4. Interpretable Unified Language CheckingarXiv:2304.03728Tianhua Zhang, Hongyin Luo, Yung-Sung Chuang, et al.2023 · 32 citations
  5. Rethinking Reflection in Pre-TrainingarXiv:2504.04022Essential AI: Darsh J Shah, Peter Rushton, Somanshu Singla, et al.2025 · 15 citations

31 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/schuster-2020-limitations-stylometry-detecting-machine-generated/cited-by/