Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2026 / Mitigating Action-Relation Hallucinations in LVLMs via Relation-aware Visual Enhancement

Mitigating Action-Relation Hallucinations in LVLMs via Relation-aware Visual Enhancement

Paper · 2026 · Zhenxin Qin, Qiang Li, Qingzhuo Wang et al.

Summary

LVLMs often misdescribe what objects in an image are doing, for example claiming a woman rides a bicycle when she is actually pushing it. Most training-free fixes target object hallucinations and handle these action-relation errors poorly. Analysing LLaVA-1.5-7B, the authors find that image tokens make up most of the input yet get far less attention than text tokens. They conclude that the model leans on language priors instead of visual evidence.

Their training-free framework has two parts:

  • ARS score: the authors build query pairs that differ only in the action verb, generated with GPT-5. The Action-Relation Sensitivity (ARS) score then measures how much each attention head's visual attention changes between the two queries.
  • RVE method: Relation-aware Visual Enhancement (RVE) works on the middle layers, which turn out to be the most action-sensitive. It builds an enhancement mask from high-ARS heads and a denoising mask from low-ARS heads, which tend to capture background noise. It then boosts attention to the action-relevant regions across all heads of those layers.

According to the paper, the method beats existing baselines on action-relation hallucinations and also helps with spatial-relation and object hallucinations, at almost no extra inference cost.

Key points

  • Attention imbalance: in LLaVA-1.5-7B, text tokens receive roughly 10–100× more attention than image tokens, although image tokens are 87.8% of the input. Outside the first two layers, image tokens get only about 4.2–16.4% of attention.
  • Which heads matter: masking the heads with the highest ARS scores causes a sharp accuracy drop, while masking random heads degrades accuracy only slowly.
  • Best hyperparameters:
    • Fraction of image tokens selected: 0.05 for LLaVA-1.5-7B, versus 0.5 for InstructBLIP-7B. The authors attribute the higher value to its Q-Former producing only 32 image tokens.
    • Enhancement coefficient: best at 1.0.
    • Number of selected heads: best at 5.
  • Speed: latency stays close to the vanilla model, whereas the contrastive-decoding baselines VCD and ICD roughly double it.
  • Limitations and code: the method needs access to model internals, so it cannot be applied to API-only models. The best choice of layers may differ by architecture and task. Code is at github.com/LandHqzx/ARS-RVE.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

📚 Shelves 2The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Computer Science · 16,667 worksComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2,869 works

Cite

Cite as Zhenxin Qin, Qiang Li, Qingzhuo Wang, Ruiyang Qin, Zhihua Wei and Wen Shen. 2026. Mitigating Action-Relation Hallucinations in LVLMs via Relation-aware Visual Enhancement. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers).

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.1142

@inproceedings{qin2026mitigating,
  title = {{Mitigating Action-Relation Hallucinations in LVLMs via Relation-aware Visual Enhancement}},
  author = {Zhenxin Qin, Qiang Li, Qingzhuo Wang, Ruiyang Qin, Zhihua Wei and Wen Shen},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.1142},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.1142}
}

References

32 references, 11 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Wenbin An, Feng Tian, Sicong Leng, Jiahao Nie, Haonan Lin, QianYing Wang, Ping Chen, Xiaoqin Zhang, and Shijian Lu. 2025. Mitigating object hallucinations in large vision-language models with assembly of global and local attention. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Confer… find
  2. Lorenzo Basile, Valentino Maiorca, Diego Doimo, Francesco Locatello, and Alberto Cazzaniga. Head pursuit: Probing attention specialization in multimodal transformers. In The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. find
  3. Davide Caffagni, Federico Cocchi, Luca Barsellotti, Nicholas Moratelli, Sara Sarto, Lorenzo Baraldi, Marcella Cornia, and Rita Cucchiara. 2024. The revolution of multimodal large language models: A survey. Findings of the association for computational linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 13590–13618.
  4. Lin Chen, Jinsong Li, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang, Conghui He, Jiaqi Wang, Feng Zhao, and Dahua Lin. 2024a. Sharegpt4v: Improving large multi-modal models with better captions. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 370–387. Springer.
  5. Xiang Chen, Chenxi Wang, Yida Xue, Ningyu Zhang, Xiaoyan Yang, Qiang Li, Yue Shen, Lei Liang, Jinjie Gu, and Huajun Chen. 2024b. Unified hallucination detection for multimodal large language models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1:… find
  6. Zhaorun Chen, Zhuokai Zhao, Hongyin Luo, Huaxiu Yao, Bo Li, and Jiawei Zhou. 2024c. Halc: object hallucination reduction via adaptive focal-contrast decoding. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 7824– 7846. find
  7. Zhe Chen, Jiannan Wu, Wenhai Wang, Weijie Su, Guo Chen, Sen Xing, Muyan Zhong, Qinglong Zhang, Xizhou Zhu, Lewei Lu, Bin Li, Ping Luo, Tong Lu, Yu Qiao, and Jifeng Dai. 2024d. Internvl: Scaling up vision foundation models and aligning for generic visual-linguistic tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/C…
  8. Wenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Tiong, Junqi Zhao, Weisheng Wang, Boyang Li, Pascale N Fung, and Steven Hoi. 2023. Instructblip: Towards general-purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 36:49250–49267.
  9. Anisha Gunjal, Jihan Yin, and Erhan Bas. 2024. Detecting and preventing hallucinations in large vision language models. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 18135–18143. find
  10. Jinghan He, Kuan Zhu, Haiyun Guo, Junfeng Fang, Zhenglin Hua, Yuheng Jia, Ming Tang, Tat-Seng Chua, and Jinqiao Wang. 2025. Cracking the code of hallucination in lvlms with vision-aware head divergence. In Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volum…
  11. Qidong Huang, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang, Bin Wang, Conghui He, Jiaqi Wang, Dahua Lin, Weiming Zhang, and Nenghai Yu. 2024. Opera: Alleviating hallucination in multi-modal large language models via over-trust penalty and retrospection-allocation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vis… find
  12. Zhangqi Jiang, Junkai Chen, Beier Zhu, Tingjin Luo, Yankun Shen, and Xu Yang. 2025. Devils in middle layers of large vision-language models: Interpreting, detecting and mitigating object hallucinations via attention lens. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, page… find
  13. Prannay Kaul, Zhizhong Li, Hao Yang, Yonatan Dukler, Ashwin Swaminathan, CJ Taylor, and Stefano Soatto. 2024. Throne: An object-based hallucination benchmark for the free-form generations of large vision-language models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogn… find
  14. Sicong Leng, Hang Zhang, Guanzheng Chen, Xin Li, Shijian Lu, Chunyan Miao, and Lidong Bing. 2024. Mitigating object hallucinations in large vision-language models through visual contrastive decoding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 13872–13…
  15. Yifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2023. Evaluating object hallucination in large vision-language models. In Proceedings of the 2023 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 292–305.
  16. Zongxia Li, Xiyang Wu, Hongyang Du, Fuxiao Liu, Huy Nghiem, and Guangyao Shi. 2025. A survey of state of the art large vision language models: Benchmark evaluations and challenges. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 1587–1606. find
  17. Hanchao Liu, Wenyuan Xue, Yifei Chen, Dapeng Chen, Xiutian Zhao, Ke Wang, Liping Hou, Rongjun Li, and Wei Peng. 2024a. A survey on hallucination in large vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00253. find
  18. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, and Yong Jae Lee. 2024b. Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 26296–26306.
  19. Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, Bo Li, Yuanhan Zhang, Sheng Shen, and Yong Jae Lee. 2024c. LLaVA-NeXT: Improved Reasoning, OCR, and World Knowledge. find
  20. Haoyu Lu, Wen Liu, Bo Zhang, Bingxuan Wang, Kai Dong, Bo Liu, Jingxiang Sun, Tongzheng Ren, Zhuoshu Li, Hao Yang, Yaofeng Sun, Chengqi Deng, Hanwei Xu, Zhenda Xie, and Chong Ruan. 2024. Deepseek-vl: Towards real-world vision-language understanding. Preprint, arXiv:2403.05525.
  21. Jiahao Nie, Gongjie Zhang, Wenbin An, Yap-Peng Tan, Alex C Kot, and Shijian Lu. 2024. Mmrel: A relation understanding benchmark in the mllm era. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09121. — [arXiv:2406.09121](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09121) find
  22. Zhiqing Sun, Sheng Shen, Shengcao Cao, Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yikang Shen, Chuang Gan, Liangyan Gui, Yu-Xiong Wang, Yiming Yang, Kurt Keutzer, and Trevor Darrell. 2024. Aligning large multimodal models with factually augmented RLHF. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: AC…
  23. Junyang Wang, Yuhang Wang, Guohai Xu, Jing Zhang, Yukai Gu, Haitao Jia, Jiaqi Wang, Haiyang Xu, Ming Yan, Ji Zhang, and Jitao Sang. 2024a. Amber: An llm-free multi-dimensional benchmark for mllms hallucination evaluation. Preprint, arXiv:2311.07397. find
  24. Xintong Wang, Jingheng Pan, Liang Ding, and Chris Biemann. 2024b. Mitigating hallucinations in large vision-language models with instruction contrastive decoding. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, pages 15840– 15853. find
  25. Mingrui Wu, Jiayi Ji, Oucheng Huang, Jiale Li, Yuhang Wu, Xiaoshuai Sun, and Rongrong Ji. 2024. Evaluating and analyzing relationship hallucinations in large vision-language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 53553–53570. PMLR. find
  26. Wenhao Wu, Yizhong Wang, Guangxuan Xiao, Hao Peng, and Yao Fu. 2025. Retrieval head mechanistically explains long-context factuality. In 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, pages 33762–33775. International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR.
  27. Hao Yin, Guangzong Si, and Zilei Wang. 2025. Clear-sight: Visual signal enhancement for object hallucination mitigation in multimodal large language models. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 14625–14634. find
  28. Qifan Yu, Juncheng Li, Longhui Wei, Liang Pang, Wentao Ye, Bosheng Qin, Siliang Tang, Qi Tian, and Yueting Zhuang. 2024a. Hallucidoctor: Mitigating hallucinatory toxicity in visual instruction data. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 12… find
  29. Tianyu Yu, Yuan Yao, Haoye Zhang, Taiwen He, Yifeng Han, Ganqu Cui, Jinyi Hu, Zhiyuan Liu, Hai-Tao Zheng, Maosong Sun, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2024b. Rlhf-v: Towards trustworthy mllms via behavior alignment from fine-grained correctional human feedback. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Comput… find
  30. Zhiyuan Zhao, Bin Wang, Linke Ouyang, Xiaoyi Dong, Jiaqi Wang, and Conghui He. 2023. Beyond hallucinations: Enhancing lvlms through hallucination-aware direct preference optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16839. — [arXiv:2311.16839](https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16839) find
  31. Kening Zheng, Junkai Chen, Yibo Yan, Xin Zou, Huiyu Zhou, and Xuming Hu. 2025. Reefknot: A comprehensive benchmark for relation hallucination evaluation, analysis and mitigation in multimodal large language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025, pages 6193– 6… find
  32. Yiyang Zhou, Chenhang Cui, Jaehong Yoon, Linjun Zhang, Zhun Deng, Chelsea Finn, Mohit Bansal, and Huaxiu Yao. 2024. Analyzing and mitigating object hallucination in large vision-language models. In 12th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024. *Figure 10: Performance comparis… find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/qin-2026-mitigating-action-relation-hallucinations-lvlms/