Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2017 / Postcolonial Literature and World Englishes: A Corpus-Based Approach of Modes of Representation of the Non-Standard in Writing

Postcolonial Literature and World Englishes: A Corpus-Based Approach of Modes of Representation of the Non-Standard in Writing

Paper · 2017 · Michael Percillier and Catherine Paulin

Summary

The paper asks how writers render non-standard Englishes in prose fiction, and how closely those renderings match the real varieties. The authors built a literary corpus from anthologies and collections. It has an Outer Circle part (West Africa, Southeast Asia) and an Inner Circle reference part (Scotland). They hand-annotated it in XML for non-standard features in four categories: phonology, grammar, lexis and code. They also marked which character or narrator is speaking. Cross-regional comparisons use normalised frequencies, and grammatical features are linked to eWAVE so their spread in literature can be set against eWAVE's frequency ratings for the real varieties.

Each region leans on one dominant category: Scottish texts on phonological respellings, Southeast Asian texts on code-mixing, West African texts on grammar. Scottish texts are also far denser in non-standard features. Within texts, feature choices signal a character's social status, ethnicity and age. The accuracy check shows that authors often skip frequent but widely shared features. Instead they use rarer but emblematic ones, or even features not attested in the variety. This suggests literary dialect is more symbolic than mimetic.

Key points

  • The corpus has three sub-corpora:
    • West Africa: 60,704 words, from Nigeria and Sierra Leone.
    • Southeast Asia: 75,588 words, from Singapore, Malaysia and the Philippines.
    • Scotland: 21,269 words.
    • The target is about 100,000 words per sub-corpus, balanced by decade.
  • The XML annotation records the feature category, the observed form and the expected standard form. Depending on the category, it can also record meaning, language and an eWAVE feature ID.
  • The "phonology" category only covers respellings that change pronunciation (e.g. de for the). Respellings that leave the sound unchanged ("eye-dialect", e.g. lissen) are kept out of it.
  • Measured per 10,000 words, Scottish texts have about eight times the density of non-standard features found in West African texts, and the West African texts are themselves denser than the Southeast Asian ones.
  • Scottish texts show only one eWAVE A-rated (pervasive) grammatical feature, and it appears in just half the texts.
    • Quotative like is rated pervasive for Scottish English but never occurs in the Scottish texts.
    • The B-rated past-tense levelling (telt for told) appears in five of eight texts.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. Each non-standard token is annotated with both the observed form and its standard counterpart, so variation is stored as an explicit mapping rather than as noise.
  • I2. Respellings that change pronunciation are separated from purely visual "eye-dialect" ones, because only the former carry linguistic information.
  • I3. Non-standard features are attributed to specific characters or the narrator, so density and feature type can be read as part of a character profile (status, ethnicity, age).
  • I4. Observed feature frequencies are compared with an external reference grading (eWAVE A/B/D/X), which exposes both omitted frequent features and unattested "invented" ones.
  • I5. The finding that writers favour emblematic features over frequent but widely shared ones ("iconicity trumps frequency") warns against treating fiction as a faithful sample of real speech.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (tokens): The en tokenizer and lemmatizer could keep a standard-equivalent field for dialectal or respelled tokens (e.g. telt → told, de → the), so later stages work on normalised forms while the original surface form stays traceable.
  • I2 (tokens): Normalisation rules could flag whether a respelling is phonological or cosmetic, which lets dialogue in fiction be normalised without losing signals about how a character speaks.
  • I3 (world): Entities in the text world could carry a speech-style profile built from the dialect features in their quoted lines, which would help answer questions about who a character is or how they are portrayed.
  • I4 (learn): Silver data or generated text could be checked against a reference frequency profile, with features that should be common but are missing, or present but impossible, used as diagnostic negative controls.
  • I5 (answer): Readers for fables and tales should treat dialect marking in dialogue as deliberate characterisation, not as evidence about real language use, and should not let it skew grammatical expectations learned from other genres.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

Cite

Cite as Michael Percillier and Catherine Paulin. 2017. Postcolonial Literature and World Englishes: A Corpus-Based Approach of Modes of Representation of the Non-Standard in Writing. International Journal of Literary Linguistics 6.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.15462/ijll.v6i1.102

@article{percillier2017postcolonial,
  title = {{Postcolonial Literature and World Englishes: A Corpus-Based Approach of Modes of Representation of the Non-Standard in Writing}},
  author = {Michael Percillier and Catherine Paulin},
  journal = {International Journal of Literary Linguistics 6},
  year = {2017},
  doi = {10.15462/ijll.v6i1.102},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.15462/ijll.v6i1.102}
}

References

42 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Achebe, Chinua (1963). No Longer at Ease. London: Penguin. find
  2. Adichie, Chimamanda N. (2006). Half of a Yellow Sun. New York: Fourth Estate. find
  3. Alber, Jan & Fludernik, Monika (2010). Introduction. Postclassical Narratology. Approaches and Analyses, eds. Jan Alber & Monika Fludernik. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1-31. find
  4. Alo, M.A. & Mesthrie, Rajend (2008). Nigerian English. Morphology and Syntax. Varieties of English. Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Volume 4, ed. Rajend Mesthrie. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 323-339. find
  5. Androutsopoulos, Jannis K. (2000). Non-Standard Spellings in Media Texts. The Case of German Fanzines, Journal of Sociolinguistics 4, 514-533. find
  6. Baskaran, Loga (2008). Malaysian English. Phonology. Varieties of English. Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Volume 4, ed. Rajend Mesthrie. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 278-291. find
  7. Blake, Norman F. (1981). Non-Standard Language in English Literature. London: André Deutsch Limited. find
  8. Cole, Robert W. (1960). Kossoh Town Boy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  9. De Geest, Dirk & Van Gorp, Hendrik (1999). Literary Genres from a Systemic-Functionalist Perspective, European Journal of English Studies 3, 33-50. find
  10. Elugbe, Ben (2008). Nigerian Pidgin English. Phonology. Varieties of English. Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Volume 4, ed. Rajend Mesthrie. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 55-64. find
  11. Ekwensi, Cyprian (1966). Lokotown. Lokotown and Other Stories. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 1-44. find
  12. Emecheta, Buchi (1979). The Joys of Motherhood. London: Heinemann Educational Books. find
  13. Faraclas, Nicholas (1996). Nigerian Pidgin. London: Routledge. find
  14. Faraclas, Nicholas (2008). Nigerian Pidgin English. Morphology and Syntax. Varieties of English. Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Volume 4, ed. Rajend Mesthrie. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 340-367. find
  15. Fowler, Roger (1989). Linguistics and the Novel. London: Routledge. find
  16. Freeman, Margaret H. (2010). Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Literary Studies. State of the Art in Cognitive Poetics. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, eds. Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1175-1202. find
  17. Gadet, Françoise (2003). La variation sociale en français. Paris: Ophrys. find
  18. Gries, Stefan Th. (2010). Useful Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. A Mosaic of Corpus Linguistics. Selected Approaches, eds. Aquilino S nchez & Moisés A. Almela. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 269-291. find
  19. Honeybone, Patrick & Watson, Kevin (2013). Salience and the Sociolinguistics of Scouse Spelling. Exploring the Phonology of the Contemporary Humorous Localised Dialect Literature of Liverpool, English World-Wide 34(3), 305-340. ↗
  20. Kachru, Braj B. (1985). Standards, Codification and Sociolinguistic Realism. The English Language in the Outer Circle. English in the World. Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, eds. Randolph Quirk & Henry G. Widdowson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press & The British Council, 11-30. find
  21. Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds.) (2013). The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at http://ewave-atlas.org (accessed 17 February 2016). ↗
  22. Lemon Jim (2006). Plotrix. A Package in the Red Light District of R, R-News 6(4), 8-12. find
  23. Mair, Christian (1992). Literary Sociolinguistics. A Methodological Framework for Research on the Use of Nonstandard Language in Fiction, Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 17(1), 103-123. find
  24. Maniam, Krishnan S. (1981). The Return. London: Skoob Books Publishing. find
  25. Minnick, Lisa C. (2004). Dialect and Dichotomy. Literary Representations of African American Speech. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. find
  26. Moreno, Carolina P.A. & Nunes, Ana (2009). The Representation of the Spoken Mode in Fiction. How Authors Write How People Talk. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press. find
  27. Müller-Wood, Anja (2013). Preface, Language and Dialogue 3(1), 1-5. find
  28. Page, Norman (1988). Speech in the English Novel. Basingstoke: Macmillan. ↗
  29. Percillier, Michael (2016). World Englishes and Second Language Acquisition. Insights from Southeast Asian Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ↗
  30. Preston, Dennis (1982). Ritin fowklower daun rong. Folklorists’ Failure in Phonology, Journal of American Folklore 95, 304-326. find
  31. Prince, Gerald (2003). A Dictionary of Narratology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. find
  32. R Core Team (2015). R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. find
  33. Sebba, Mark (2007). Spelling and Society. The Culture and Politics of Orthography Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ↗
  34. Steen, Gerard (1999). Genres of Discourse and the Definition of Literature, Discourse Processes 28, 109-120. find
  35. Schneider, Edgar W. (2002). Investigating Variation and Change in Written Documents. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, eds. Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes. Oxford: Blackwell, 67-96. find
  36. Simpson, Paul (1997). Language Through Literature. An Introduction. London: Routledge. find
  37. Tannen, Deborah (1982). Oral and Literate Strategies in Spoken and Written Narratives, Language 58(1), 1-21. Tayao, Ma. find
  38. Lourdes G. (2008). Philippine English. Phonology. Varieties of English. Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Volume 4, ed. Rajend Mesthrie. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 292–306. find
  39. Ubanako, Valentine N. & Anderson, Jemima (2014). Crossing Linguistic Borders in Postcolonial Anglophone Africa. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. find
  40. Wee, Lionel (2008). Singapore English. Phonology. Varieties of English. Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Volume 4, ed. Rajend Mesthrie. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 259–277. find
  41. Wickham, Hadley (2009). ggplot2. Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer. find
  42. Yeo, Robert (1986). The Adventures of Holden Heng. Singapore: Epigram Books. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/percillier-2017-postcolonial-literature-world-englishes-corpus/