Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A… / cited by

Who cites «The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representation»

41 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 19 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representation»

  1. LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation TasksarXiv:2406.18403Anna Bavaresco, Raffaella Bernardi, Leonardo Bertolazzi, et al.2024 · 141 citations
  2. LLM Analysis of 150+ years of German Parliamentary Debates on Migration Reveals Shift from Post-War Solidarity to Anti-Solidarity in the Last DecadearXiv:2509.07274Aida Kostikova, Ole Putz, Steffen Eger, et al.2025

22 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/pavlovic-2024-effectiveness-llms-annotators-comparative-overview/cited-by/