🔗 Who cites «Identifying Appropriate Support for Propositions in Online User Comments»

71 papers of our library cite it (of the 141,840 whose bibliographies we read) · 11 with a page here, the most cited first · ← the paper

1. Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive EssaysChristian Stab, Iryna Gurevych2017 · 613 citations
2. Argument Mining: A SurveyJohn Lawrence, Chris Reed2019 · 601 citations
3. Which argument is more convincing? Analyzing and predicting convincingness of Web arguments using bidirectional LSTMIvan Habernal, Iryna Gurevych2016 · 302 citations
4. Show Me Your Evidence - an Automatic Method for Context Dependent Evidence DetectionRuty Rinott, Lena Dankin, Carlos Alzate Perez, et al.2015 · 296 citations
5. Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web DiscourseIvan Habernal, Iryna Gurevych2017 · 243 citations
6. Joint prediction in MST-style discourse parsing for argumentation miningAndreas Peldszus, Manfred Stede2015 · 219 citations
7. End-to-End Argumentation Mining in Student EssaysIsaac Persing, Vincent Ng2016 · 182 citations
8. What makes a convincing argument? Empirical analysis and detecting attributes of convincingness in Web argumentationIvan Habernal, Iryna Gurevych2016 · 165 citations
9. From Arguments to Key Points: Towards Automatic Argument SummarizationRoy Bar-Haim, Lilach Eden, Roni Friedman, et al.2020 · 144 citations
10. The Role of Pragmatic and Discourse Context in Determining Argument ImpactEsin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Claire Cardie2019 · 24 citations
11. A Pragmatics-Centered Evaluation Framework for Natural Language UnderstandingDamien Sileo, Philippe Muller, Tim Van de Cruys, et al.2022 · 6 citations

60 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/park-2014-identifying-appropriate-support-propositions-online/cited-by/