Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2026 / The Phoenix and the Rebirth of Old English Verse

The Phoenix and the Rebirth of Old English Verse

Paper · 2026 · Andy Orchard

Summary

The paper asks where The Phoenix, a 677-line Exeter Book poem long grouped with Cynewulf's signed work, gets its Old English phrasing, and how it fits the manuscript's opening sequence. Orchard sets aside the well-studied Latin sources and instead traces rare or unique verbal parallels between The Phoenix and the poems copied around it. Close reading of shared diction, alliteration and formulas reveals a split pattern. The first section (lines 1–380) adapts Lactantius's De aue phoenice and fills it out with phrasing mostly from Guthlac A. The freer allegorical second section (381–677), along with the opening lines, draws chiefly on Guthlac B. Further links reach Elene, Andreas, Juliana and The Wanderer. These findings support reading The Phoenix as one planned poem. They also suggest the first nine Exeter Book poems form a deliberately ordered chain, in which Guthlac imitates Christ and the phoenix stands for both. This matters because it shows vernacular poets using the same echo-and-emulation craft already documented in Anglo-Latin verse of the same era.

Key points

  • The Phoenix has 677 lines. Just three poems in the manuscript exceed it in length: Christ C (798), Guthlac A (818) and Juliana (731).
  • Its Latin model, De aue phoenice (attributed to Lactantius), has 85 elegiac couplets (170 lines) and underlies Phoen 1–380. Lines 381–677 build an allegory linking the bird's rebirth to Christ's resurrection.
  • The Christ A–C and Guthlac A–B compilations together exceed 3,000 lines despite lost leaves. Azarias, which lacks its opening, sits between Guthlac B and The Phoenix.
  • Diagnostic evidence comes from tightly restricted vocabulary. For example, ā·mered ("purified") appears in Elene and otherwise only twice in verse, both times in Phoenix part two. The sequence frēan / ġe·sēon sigora is shared by Elene, Guthlac B 1080a and Phoen 675a.
  • The macaronic close (Phoen 667–77) pairs Latin and Old English half-lines through alliteration and uses seven dependent infinitives. A fuller formula list is available in CLASP 2022.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. Influence is shown through rare or unique shared phrasing rather than common formulas, since only low-frequency overlaps can point to a specific donor text.
  • I2. The poem's borrowings change with its sections: where it follows a source closely, it pads from one donor, and where it departs, it relies on another. Provenance therefore has to be modelled per segment, not per document.
  • I3. Envelope patterns, where a repeated phrase opens and closes a passage (as in Guthlac's "my dear child" address), mark discourse units and their emotional framing.
  • I4. In the bilingual ending, the Old English half-lines carry the verbs and actions, while the Latin half-lines carry nouns and adjectives. A part-of-speech profile thus exposes how labour is divided inside one passage.
  • I5. A "here … there" structuring sequence contrasts the present life with the afterlife and organises a long run of parallel clauses.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (learn): When attributing silver-data errors or tracing which witness parser shaped an output, weight agreement on rare constructions above agreement on frequent ones.
  • I2 (world): Track the provenance of facts per text segment so that conflicting or inherited content can be explained at the right granularity.
  • I3 (frames): Detect near-identical bracketing phrases to delimit addresses or speech acts and attach their affective tone to everything inside.
  • I4 (tokens): Compare POS distributions between interleaved spans, such as quotations versus narration, as a cheap, explainable signal of register or voice shifts.
  • I5 (world): Use explicit deictic contrast markers to split parallel predicates into separate time or world states instead of merging them into one timeline.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

🎓University of OxfordOxford · United Kingdom122 works · 160,277 citations

 Fields, topics and concepts

📚 Shelves 3The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Arts and Humanities · 17,450 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 17,296 worksClassics · 116 works

🧭 Topics 2Research subjects and languages the work is about.English · 2,379 worksHistorical linguistics & language change · 250 works

Cite

Cite as Andy Orchard. 2026. The Phoenix and the Rebirth of Old English Verse. SELIM 31.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.17811/selim.31.2026.33-61

@inproceedings{orchard2026phoenix,
  title = {{The Phoenix and the Rebirth of Old English Verse}},
  author = {Andy Orchard},
  booktitle = {SELIM 31},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.17811/selim.31.2026.33-61},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.17811/selim.31.2026.33-61}
}

References

52 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Appleton, Helen. 2017. “The Insular Landscape of the Old English Poem The Phoenix.” Neophilologus 101: 585–602. ↗
  2. Bjork, Robert E. 2013. The Old English Poems of Cynewulf. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library 23. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. find
  3. Blake, N. F., ed. 1990. The Phoenix. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. find
  4. Brown, Carleton. 1940. “Poculum Mortis in Old English.” Speculum 15: 389–99. ↗
  5. Cahilly-Bretzin, Glenn. 2020. “Soldiering for Christ: The Role of the Miles Christi in Four Old English Saints’ Lives.” PhD diss. University of Oxford. find
  6. Chase, Colin. 1974. “God’s Presence through Grace as the Theme of Cynewulf’s Christ II and the relationship of this theme to Christ I and Christ III.” Anglo-Saxon England 3: 87–101. 1 I am grateful to Richard North, Rafael Pascual, Jane Roberts, and the anonymous readers for their comments on an earlier version. find
  7. CLASP = A Consolidated Library of Anglo-Saxon Poetry. 2022. https://clasp.ell.ox.ac.uk. ↗
  8. Clayton, Mary. 2013. Old English Poems of Christ and his Saints. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library 27. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. find
  9. Colgrave, Bertram, ed. 1985. Felix’s Life of Saint Guthlac. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  10. Cook, Albert Stanburrough, ed. 1919. The Old English Elene, Phœnix, and Physiologus. New Haven: Yale University Press. find
  11. DOE = Cameron, Angus, Ashely Crandell Amos, Antonette diPaolo Healy, Roy Liuzza, Haruko Momma, Robert Getz, and Stephen Pelle, eds. 2024. Dictionary of Old English: A to Le Online. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project. https://doe.artsci.utoronto.ca/. ↗
  12. Evans, Daniel. 2024. “New Judgements on the Artistry of Andreas: The Case of Christ III.” Anglia 142: 207–40. ↗
  13. Faraci, Dora. 2000. “Sources and Cultural Background: The Example of the Old English Phoenix.” Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale 42: 225–39. find
  14. Farrell, R. T. 1972. “Some Remarks on the Exeter Book Azarias.” Medium Ævum 41: 1–8. ↗
  15. Faulkner, Amy. 2023. “Crafted Things in the Old English Phoenix.” Anglia 141: 234–57. ↗
  16. FitzPatrick, Mary Cletus. 1933. “Lactanti De ave phoenice; with Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary.” PhD diss. University of Pennsylvania. find
  17. Gorst, E. K. C. 2006. “Latin Sources of the Old English Phoenix.” Notes and Queries 53: 136–42. ↗
  18. Griffith, Mark. 2007. “The Phoenix (C.A.3.4).” In Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register. https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/. ↗
  19. Jones, Christopher A. 2012. Old English Shorter Poems I: Religious and Didactic. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library 15. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. find
  20. Jones, Jasmine. 2024. “The Vernacular Theology of the Old English Advent Lyrics: Monastic Devotion to Mary.” Review of English Studies 75: 1–16. ↗
  21. Kantrowitz, Joanne Spencer. 1964. “The Anglo-Saxon Phoenix and Tradition.” Philological Quarterly 43: 1–13. find
  22. Lapidge, Michael. 2006. The Anglo-Saxon Library. Oxford: Oxford University Press. find
  23. McKeage, Jonathan F. 1985. “Anglo-Saxon Poetics of Translation: A Study in Guthlac and Phoenix.” PhD diss. Harvard University. find
  24. Muir, Bernard J. 2000. The Exeter Anthology of Old English Poetry: An Edition of Exeter Dean and Chapter MS 3501. 2nd rev. ed. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. find
  25. Niles, John D. 2019. God’s Exiles and English Verse: On the Exeter Anthology of Old English Poetry. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. find
  26. North, Richard, and Michael D. J. Bintley, eds. 2016. Andreas: An Edition. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. O’Donnell, Daniel. find
  27. P. 2001. “Fish and Fowl: Generic Expectations and the Relationship between the Old English Phoenix-poem and Lactantius’s De ave phoenice.” In Germanic Texts and Latin Models: Medieval Reconstructions, edited by K. E. Olsen, A. Harbus, and T. Hofstra, 157–71. Germania Latina 4. Leuven: Peeters. find
  28. Orchard, Andy. 1994. The Poetic Art of Aldhelm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ↗
  29. Orchard, Andy. 2002. “Re-reading The Wanderer: The Value of Cross-References.” In Via crucis: Essays on Early Medieval Sources and Ideas: In Memory of J. E. Cross, edited by Thomas N. Hall, Thomas D. Hill, and Charles D. Wright, 1–26. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press. find
  30. Orchard, Andy. 2003. “Both Style and Substance: The Case for Cynewulf.” In Anglo-Saxon Styles, edited by Catherine E. Karkov and George Hardin Brown, 271–305. Binghamton, NY: SUNY Press. find
  31. Orchard, Andy. 2009. “The Word Made Flesh: Christianity and Oral Culture in Anglo-Saxon England.” Oral Tradition 24 (2): 1–26. find
  32. Orchard, Andy. 2010. “Old English and Latin Poetic Traditions.” In A Companion to Medieval Poetry, edited by Corinne Saunders, 65–82. Oxford: Blackwell. ↗
  33. Orchard, Andy. 2016. “The Originality of Andreas.” In Old English Philology: Studies in Honour of R. D. Fulk, edited by Leonard Neidorf, Rafael J. Pascual, and Tom Shippey, 331–70. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer. ↗
  34. Orchard, Andy. 2020a. “Alcuin and Cynewulf: The Art and Craft of Anglo-Saxon Verse.” Journal of the British Academy 8: 295–399. ↗
  35. Orchard, Andy. 2020b. “Beyond Books: The Confluence of Influence and the Old English Judith.” In John Miles Foley’s World of Oralities: Text, Tradition, and Contemporary Oral Theory, edited by Mark Amodio, 33–50. York: ARC-Humanities. Orchard, Andy. Forthcoming. A Literary History of Old English Poetry. ↗
  36. Palumbo, Edward M. 1977. The Literary Use of Formulas in Guthlac II and their Relation to Felix’s Vita Sancti Guthlaci. De Proprietatibus Litterarum series practica 37. The Hague: Mouton. ↗
  37. Pascual, Rafael J. 2026. The Scansion of Classical Old English Verse: A Metrical Index and Database to the Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records, Vols I–IV. Berlin: Peter Lang. find
  38. Petersen, Helle Falcher. 2000. “The Phoenix: The Art of Literary Recycling.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 101: 375–86. find
  39. Pulsiano, Phillip. 1989. “The Phoenix: Lines 199b–207 and Psalm 101.7–8.” ANQ 2 (1): 3–7. ↗
  40. Remley, P. G. 2002. “Daniel, The Three Youths Fragment and the transmission of Old English Verse.” Anglo-Saxon England 31: 81–140. ↗
  41. Revell, Tom. 2025. “Verbal Parallels, Intertextuality, and the Composition of Old English Hagiographic Poetry.” PhD diss. University of Oxford. find
  42. Roberts, Jane. 1973. “Guthlac A, B, and C?” Medium Ævum 42: 43–46. find
  43. Roberts, Jane. 2007. “Understanding Hrothgar’s Humiliation: Beowulf lines 144–74 in Context.” In Text, Image, Interpretation: Studies in Anglo-Saxon Literature in Honour of Éamonn Ó Carragáin, edited by Alastair Minnis and Jane Roberts, 355–67. Turnhout: Brepols. find
  44. Roberts, Jane, ed. 1979. The Guthlac Poems of the Exeter Book. Oxford: Clarendon Press. find
  45. Roberts, Jane, and Alan Thacker, eds. 2020. Guthlac: Crowland’s Saint. Donington: Shaun Tyas. find
  46. Salvador-Bello, Mercedes. 2024. The History of the Physiologus in Early Medieval England. Turnhout: Brepols. ↗
  47. Squires, Ann, ed. 1988. The Old English Physiologus. Durham Medieval Texts 5. Durham: Durham Medieval Texts. find
  48. Stanley, E. G. 1955. “Old English Poetic Diction and the Interpretation of the Wanderer, the Seafarer, and the Penitent’s Prayer.” Anglia 73: 414–66. find
  49. Steen, Janie. 2008. Verse and Virtuosity: The Adaptation of Latin Rhetoric in Old English Verse. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. find
  50. Thomas, Daniel. 2026. The Old English Poet as Reader. Turnhout: Brepols. ↗
  51. Tyler, Elizabeth M. 1996. “How Deliberate Is Deliberate Verbal Repetition?” In Studies in English Language and Literature. “Doubt Wisely”: Papers in Honour of E. G. Stanley, edited by M. J. Toswell and E. M. Tyler, 508–30. London: Routledge. find
  52. White, Carolinne. 2000. Early Christian Latin Poets. London: Routledge. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/orchard-2026-phoenix-rebirth-old-english-verse/