🔗 Who cites «Comparing Automatic and Human Evaluation of Local Explanations for Text Classification»

67 papers of our library cite it (of the 141,840 whose bibliographies we read) · 5 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Comparing Automatic and Human Evaluation of Local Explanations for Text Classification»

Is Attention Interpretable?Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Sofia Serrano, Noah A. Smith2019 · 889 citations
ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP ModelsAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Jay DeYoung, Sarthak Jain, Nazneen Fatema Rajani, et al.2020 · 821 citations
Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How Should We Define and Evaluate Faithfulness?Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Alon Jacovi, Yoav Goldberg2020 · 748 citations
Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Peter Hase, Mohit Bansal2020 · 309 citations
Leakage-Adjusted Simulatability: Can Models Generate Non-Trivial Explanations of Their Behavior in Natural Language?Findings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsPeter Hase, Shiyue Zhang, Harry Xie, et al.2020 · 120 citations

62 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/nguyen-2018-comparing-automatic-human-evaluation-local/cited-by/