Cognitive Plausibility in Natural Language Processing
Paper · 2024 · Yevgen Matusevych
Summary
This item is a book review, not an original study. Yevgen Matusevych (University of Groningen) evaluates Cognitive Plausibility in Natural Language Processing by Lisa Beinborn and Nora Hollenstein (Springer, Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, 2024). The book asks how closely modern NLP systems resemble human language processing. This criterion is usually neglected in favour of accuracy, fairness or efficiency. The authors treat plausibility as graded and multidimensional and study three aspects: whether models and people make matching decisions, use comparable internal representations, and follow similar processing strategies. They draw on behavioral and neural datasets of language comprehension, though not production. They also survey interpretability tools such as test suites, probing classifiers, attention analysis and mapping to brain responses. They find no universal recipe but propose concrete directions: difficulty-aware evaluation, context-sensitive representation analysis, multimodal input and genuinely multilingual design. The reviewer praises the gradual, accessible structure and the ethics section closing each chapter. He highlights the lesson that human data is noisy and graded, and suggests NLP should learn to accommodate this.
Key points
- The book has seven chapters. Chapters 2–3 introduce language modeling basics and cognitive data sources (behavioral and brain signals). Chapters 4–6 cover behavioral patterns, representational structure and procedural strategies.
- Curriculum learning is presented as promising, but in the 2023 BabyLM challenge it brought only modest gains (Warstadt et al. 2023).
- Multi-head attention in transformers is judged cognitively implausible. However, attention weights can still be compared with human data such as reading gaze patterns.
- The authors call for evaluation that is finer-grained and less English-centric. They also propose integrating human problem-solving strategies through multi-task and transfer learning.
- The review appeared in Computational Linguistics 50(3), 2024 (doi:10.1162/coli_r_00517) under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. The book's DOI is 10.1007/978-3-031-43260-6.
Institutions
Fields, topics and concepts
📚 Shelves 6The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Computer Science · 18,614 worksArtificial Intelligence · 17,965 worksArts and Humanities · 17,450 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 17,296 worksNeuroscience · 186 worksCognitive Neuroscience · 185 works
Cite
Cite as Yevgen Matusevych. 2024. Cognitive Plausibility in Natural Language Processing. Computational Linguistics.
@article{matusevych2024cognitive,
title = {{Cognitive Plausibility in Natural Language Processing}},
author = {Yevgen Matusevych},
journal = {Computational Linguistics},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1162/coli\_r\_00517},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_r_00517}
}References
- Baan, Joris, Nico Daheim, Evgenia Ilia, Dennis Ulmer, Haau-Sing Li, Raquel Fernández, Barbara Plank, Rico Sennrich, Chrysoula Zerva, and Wilker Aziz. 2023. Uncertainty in natural language generation: From theory to applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15703. — [arXiv:2307.15703](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15703) find
- Liu, Alisa, Zhaofeng Wu, Julian Michael, Alane Suhr, Peter West, Alexander Koller, Swabha Swayamdipta, Noah Smith, and Yejin Choi. 2023. We’re afraid language models aren’t modeling ambiguity. In Proceedings of the 2023
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 790–807. Warstadt, Alex, Aaron Mueller, Leshem Choshen, Ethan Wilcox, Chengxu Zhuang, Juan Ciro, Rafael Mosquera, Bhargavi Paranjabe, Adina Williams, Tal Linzen, and Ryan Cotterell. 2023. Findings of the BabyLM Challenge: Sample-e… find
- Computational Linguistics Volume 50, Number 3 find
Updated
This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/matusevych-2024-cognitive-plausibility-natural-language-processing/