Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2000 / Old English in Middle Kentish Place-Names

Old English in Middle Kentish Place-Names

Paper · 2000 · María Auxiliadora Martín

Summary

This SELIM article by Mª Auxiliadora Martín (the PDF footer reads Selim 10, 2000) traces what happened to the Old English long diphthong eo in Kent during Middle English. It uses place-names rather than literary texts as dialect evidence. The author compares name-forms recorded in the 12th century with those from the 14th, mainly drawing on Wallenberg's The Place-Names of Kent (PNK, 1934). PNK assembles dated attestations from the Lay Subsidy Rolls, the Assize Rolls and other records. LALME's Kentish profiles serve as an outside check for the late period. The analysis looks at the first (or only) element and the second element of compound names separately, to test whether stress position changes the outcome.

For the 12th century, Kentish reflexes swing mainly between e and i spellings, alongside a noticeable share of digraphs. Following Ek, only <ie> is accepted as evidence of a real diphthong. The extracted text omits the middle of the paper, so the full 14th-century conclusions are not available here. The study supports Kristensson's place-name survey of Middle English dialects.

Key points

  • Sources:
    • Main source: Wallenberg's PNK (1934).
    • Underlying records: Lay Subsidy Rolls and Assize Rolls. Arngart considered the Assize Rolls nearly as local as the Subsidy Rolls.
    • Late-period comparison: the 14 Kentish Linguistic Profiles of LALME (McIntosh et al. 1986), built with the fit-technique.
  • Twelfth-century coverage: 20 localities have eo in the first or only element.
    • Exclusively e: Beckenham and Greatness.
    • Exclusively i: Ifield, Twinney Creek and Newington (Folkestone Hd.).
    • Mixed e/i: Ridley, Newchurch and Tudeley.
  • Digraphs: <ea>, <eo>, <ie> and <io> all occur, for example in Bensted, Grain, Lydden, Greet, Leaveland and Lewsome. Only <ie> is read as a genuine diphthongal pronunciation.
  • Competing views on Kentish <ie>/<ye>:
    • Campbell and Jordan-Crook take it as a rising diphthong.
    • Wyld and Brook take it as Anglo-Norman spelling for [e:].
    • Ek argues it is a native diphthongal variant. One of his reasons is that <ie> forms appear before 1350, when the Anglo-Norman convention was still rare.
  • Wider context: Outside Kent, eo was smoothed to a rounded [ö:] and later unrounded to e. In the Southwest and West Midlands, rounding lasted into the 14th–15th centuries.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. Every name-form is stored with its exact date and source document, so each piece of evidence stays traceable and can be weighed by how local or reliable its document is
  • I2. Variant behaviour per locality is sorted into graded classes (exclusive, predominant, mixed, non-predominant) rather than a yes/no label, which keeps the shape of the distribution visible
  • I3. Spellings that could be mere scribal convention (Anglo-Norman <ie> for [e:]) are separated from those that carry real phonological signal, and only the latter are admitted as evidence
  • I4. Ek argues partly from absence: <ie>/<ye> forms never appear in counties like Bedfordshire or Huntingdonshire, so they cannot be a general convention
  • I5. Analysing the first and second elements of compounds separately tests whether a stressed versus unstressed position alters the result, rather than assuming it does not

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (world): facts in the knowledge graph could carry the provenance of the source and the moment they were asserted, making conflicting values explainable instead of silently merged.
  • I2 (learn): witness-parser agreement on silver data could be reported in the same graded classes, so "mixed" arcs go to repair or the LLM teacher instead of being forced into a single label.
  • I3 (tokens): spelling normalisation could explicitly mark which variants are purely orthographic and which change morphology or lemma, so that conventions never get counted as linguistic differences.
  • I4 (learn): evaluation can include such negative controls, checking that a learned repair rule or pattern does not fire on data where the phenomenon should be absent.
  • I5 (tree): parser accuracy could be broken down by structural position (head vs. modifier inside compounds and flat names), revealing errors that an overall LAS score hides.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

📚 Shelves 3The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Arts and Humanities · 9,296 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 9,206 worksClassics · 67 works

🧭 Topics 2Research subjects and languages the work is about.English · 1,373 worksHistorical linguistics & language change · 159 works

Cite

Cite as María Auxiliadora Martín. 2000. Old English in Middle Kentish Place-Names. SELIM 10.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.17811/selim.10.2000.55-76

@inproceedings{martin2000old,
  title = {{Old English in Middle Kentish Place-Names}},
  author = {María Auxiliadora Martín},
  booktitle = {SELIM 10},
  year = {2000},
  doi = {10.17811/selim.10.2000.55-76},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.17811/selim.10.2000.55-76}
}

References

30 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Arngart, Olof S. (Anderson) 1934-39: The English Hundred-Names. Vols. 1-3. Gleerup, Lund. find
  2. Arngart, Olof S. (Anderson) 1949: Middle English Dialects. Studier i Modern Sprakvetenskap 17: 17- 29. find
  3. Brook, George Leslie 1965 (1958): English Dialects. Andre Deutsch, London. find
  4. Cameron, Kenneth 1961: English Place-Names. Batsford, London. find
  5. Campbell, Alistair 1959: Old English Grammar. Clarendon Press, Oxford. find
  6. Copley, G. J. 1968: English Place-Names and their Origins. David & Charles, Devon. find
  7. Ek, Karl-Gustav 1972: The Development of OE y and eo in South-Eastern Middle English. Gleerup, Lund. find
  8. Ek, Karl-Gustav 1975: The Development of OE æ (i-mutated a) before Nasal and OE æ in South-Eastern Middle English. Gleerup, Lund. find
  9. Ekwall, Eilert 1931: Studies on English Place- and Personal Names. Gleerup, Lund. find
  10. Ekwall, Eilert 1980: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Place-Names. Oxford University Press, Oxford. find
  11. Hogg, Richard M. 1992: A Grammar of Old English. Vol. I: Phonology. Blackwell, Oxford. find
  12. Jordan, Richard 1974: Handbook of Middle English Grammar: Phonology. [translated and revised by Eugene J. Crook]. Mouton, The Hague. find
  13. Kristensson, Gillis 1967: A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290-1350: The Six Northern Counties and Lincolnshire. Gleerup, Lund. find
  14. Kristensson, Gillis 1987: A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290-1350: The West Midland Counties. Gleerup, Lund. find
  15. Kristensson, Gillis 1995: A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290-1350: The East Midland Counties. Wallin & Dalholm Boktr AB, Lund. Old Elglish eo in Middle Kentish Place-names Kristensson, Gillis 2001: A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290-1350. The Southern Counties. I. Vowels (except Diphthongs). Lund University Press, Lund. find
  16. Luick, Karl 1914/1941: Historische Grammatik der Englischen Sprache. Tauchnitz, Stuttgart. find
  17. McIntosh, Angus, Michael L. Samuels, Michael Benskin, Margaret Laing and Keith Williamson 1986: A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English. 4 vols. Aberdeen University Press, Aberdeen. find
  18. Moore, Samuel, Sandford B. Meech and Harold Whitehall 1935: Middle English Dialect Characteristics and dialect Boundaries. Language and Literature. University of Michigan Publications, Ann Arbor. find
  19. Mossé, Fernand 1952: A Handbook of Middle English. [tr. J.A. Walker]. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. find
  20. Reany, Percy H. 1925: On Certain Phonological Features of the Dialect of London in the Twelfth Century. Englische Studien 59: 321-45. find
  21. Reany, Percy H. 1964. The Origin of English Place-Names. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. find
  22. Serjeantson, Mary S. 1922: The Dialectal Distribution of Certain Phonological Features in Middle English. English Studies 4: 93-109, 191-98. ↗
  23. Serjeantson, Mary S. 1924: Distributions of Dialect Characters in Middle English. Amsterdam [No indication of publisher] find
  24. Serjeantson, Mary S. 1927a: The Dialects of the West Midlands in Middle English. Review of English Studies 3: 54-67, 186-203, 319-31. ↗
  25. Serjeantson, Mary S. 1927b: The Development of Old English eag, eah in Middle English. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 26: 198-225 and 350-400. find
  26. Smith, A. H. 1956: English Place-Name Elements. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. find
  27. Thuresson, Bertil. 1950: Middle English Occupational Terms. Lund University Press, Lund. find
  28. Mª Auxiliadora Martín Wallenberg, J. K. 1934: The Place-Names of Kent. Appelbergs Boktryckerei Aktiebolag, Uppsala. find
  29. Wyld, Henry C. 1921: South-Eastern and South-East Midland Dialects in Middle English. Essays and Studies 6: 112-145. find
  30. Wyld, Henry C. 1927: A Short History of English (3 rd edn.). John Murray, London. * † * find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/martin-2019-old-english-middle-kentish-place/