Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2019 / An analysis of the punctuation of the Middle English "Letter of Ipocras" in London, Wellcome Library, MS 405

An analysis of the punctuation of the Middle English "Letter of Ipocras" in London, Wellcome Library, MS 405

Paper · 2019 · Teresa Marqués-Aguado

Summary

Scholars have long treated medieval English punctuation as random and inconsistent. This study tests that view on one witness: the Middle English medical compilation called the Letter of Ipocras (LI), found in ff. 21v–40v of London, Wellcome Library, MS 405 (W405). W405 is a small, plain, early-15th-century medical miscellany. The author first reviews earlier research and the functions usually assigned to historical pointing. These are rhetorical, grammatical and macro-textual functions, plus the newer "visual pragmatics" approach with textual, interactional and stance levels. She then describes the codex and the text, lists every punctuation sign, and classifies its uses with examples. The practice proves fairly systematic. Marks signal grammatical structure at sentence, clause and phrase level, and they signal pragmatic organisation, mostly textual and occasionally interactional. No rhetorical, pause-marking use appears. The paragraph mark leans towards pragmatic roles, while the punctus covers both kinds. A sharp change in pointing after f. 32v supports the idea that several scribes copied the text. The work contributes to a diachronic history of punctuation in non-literary texts.

Key points

  • The LI in W405 has five parts: an invocation of Hippocrates with a humoural tract, a short uroscopy of six urines, a recipe collection, a Latin passage (ff. 37v–38r) and a recipe for a drink of Antioche (ff. 38v–40v). The text is included in the Málaga Corpus, a lemmatised and tagged collection of scientific prose written in late Middle English.
  • The repertoire centres on two signs, the paragraph mark and the punctus, with 298 punctuation marks in total.
  • Minor uses of the punctus include:
    • coordinating noun phrases, mostly ingredients (11×);
    • enumerating them (4×);
    • enclosing Roman numerals (4 pairs) and a Latin word inside English text (1 pair);
    • separating prayer components in the Latin passage (7×).
  • After f. 32v only 23 puncti and 9 paragraph marks occur, and some folios have no punctuation at all. Paragraph marks disappear entirely after f. 37v, which the author reads as scribal rather than authorial pointing.
  • Marks are not placed in every context where a given use is possible, but the tendencies are internally coherent. Pragmatic uses depend on the genre (recipe titles, alternative procedures). Grammatical uses depend on the syntactic structures present.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. The author classifies each mark by the job it does on several levels (grammatical sentence/clause/phrase vs pragmatic textual/interactional) rather than by its shape, so one dot can end a sentence in one place and join noun phrases in another.
  • I2. A drop in how often marks appear, and how varied their uses are, partway through the manuscript serves as evidence that a different copyist took over.
  • I3. Pragmatic punctuation uses vary with genre, while grammatical ones follow syntax wherever it occurs; the paper keeps these two drivers apart.
  • I4. Two different signs can share a function while still showing a tendency to specialise (paragraph mark mostly pragmatic, punctus broader).
  • I5. The paper treats inconsistent application as a set of tendencies, not as noise: a sign missing from some eligible contexts does not mean it is random.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (tree): Treat punctuation in old or informal input as ambiguous between sentence boundary and conjunction-like coordination, and let the parser choose the punct attachment rather than splitting sentences blindly at every period.
  • I2 (learn): Compute per-segment punctuation and style profiles over silver corpora to flag source or domain switches, so those segments can be audited or held out as negative controls.
  • I3 (frames): In instructional texts like recipes, tie marker cues to genre-specific acts (title, step, alternative course of action introduced by "or"), while keeping clause-level cues genre-neutral.
  • I4 (tokens): Map distinct marks such as the pilcrow and the period onto shared function features with soft preferences, instead of giving each glyph one fixed tag.
  • I5 (learn): When evaluating cue-based repair rules, measure precision and coverage separately, so a cue that is reliable but sparse is not discarded as unsystematic.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

🎓Universidad de MurciaMurcia · Spain5 works · 3 citations

 Fields, topics and concepts

📚 Shelves 3The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Arts and Humanities · 16,039 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 15,891 worksClassics · 116 works

🧭 Topics 2Research subjects and languages the work is about.English · 2,263 worksHistorical linguistics & language change · 249 works

Cite

Cite as Teresa Marqués-Aguado. 2019. An analysis of the punctuation of the Middle English "Letter of Ipocras" in London, Wellcome Library, MS 405. Journal of English Studies 17.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.18172/jes.3571

@article{marquesaguado2019analysis,
  title = {{An analysis of the punctuation of the Middle English "Letter of Ipocras" in London, Wellcome Library, MS 405}},
  author = {Teresa Marqués-Aguado},
  journal = {Journal of English Studies 17},
  year = {2019},
  doi = {10.18172/jes.3571},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.3571}
}

References

44 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Alonso Almeida, F. J. 2002. “Punctuation practice in a late Medieval English medical remedybook”. Folia Linguistica Historica 22 (1-2): 207-232. ↗
  2. Journal of English Studies, vol. 17 (2019) 233-251 find
  3. Arakelian, P. G. 1975. “Punctuation in a late Middle English manuscript”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 76: 614-624. find
  4. Brown, C. and R. H. Robbins. 1943. The index of Middle English verse. New York: Columbia University Press. find
  5. Brown, M. P. 1990. A guide to Western historical scripts from Antiquity to 1600. London: The British Library. find
  6. Calle-Martín, J. 2004. “Punctuation practice in a 15th-century arithmetical treatise (MS Bodley 790)”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 4: 407-422. find
  7. Calle-Martín, J. and A. Miranda-García. 2005. “Editing Middle English punctuation. The case of MS Egerton 2622 (ff. 136-165)”. International Journal of English Studies 5 (2): 27-44. find
  8. Carroll, R. 1999. “Middle English recipe as a text-type”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 100 (1): 27-42. find
  9. Carroll, R., Peikola, M., Salmi, H., Varila, M.-L., Skaffari, J. and R. Hiltunen. 2013. “Pragmatics on the page”. European Journal of English Studies 17 (1): 54-71. ↗
  10. Cruz Cabanillas, I. de la. 2014. “Punctuation practice in manuscript Seinte Geneviève 3390”. Nordic Journal of English Studies 13 (3): 139-159. find
  11. Cruz Cabanillas, I. de la. 2016. “Is punctuation comparable? The case of London, Westminster School MS 3 and Paris, Bibliothèque Sainte Geneviève MS 3390”. ES. Revista de Filología Inglesa 37: 11-31. find
  12. Edmar, D., ed. 1967. MS. Wellcome 405. A Middle English leech-book. Stockholm: Stockholm University. find
  13. Esteban-Segura, M. L. 2009. “Punctuation practice in G.U.L. MS Hunter 509”. Textual healing: Studies in Medieval English medical, scientific and technical texts. Eds. J. E. Díaz Vera and R. Caballero Rodríguez. Bern and New York: Peter Lang. 93-107. find
  14. Hamel, C. F. R. de. 1992. Scribes and illuminators. London: British Museum Press. find
  15. Hector, L. C. 1966. The handwriting of English documents. London: Edward Arnold. find
  16. Horobin, S. 2016. “Manuscripts and early printed books”. The Cambridge handbook of English historical linguistics. Eds. M. Kytö and P. Pahta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 111-126. ↗
  17. Hudson, A. 1977. “Middle English”. Editing medieval texts: English, French and Latin written in England. Papers given at the twelfth Annual Conference on Editorial Problems. Ed. A. G. Rigg. New York and London: Garland. 34-57. find
  18. Hunt, T. 1990. Popular medicine in thirteenth-century England. Introduction and texts. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer. find
  19. Journal of English Studies, vol. 17 (2019) 233-251 find
  20. Jenkinson, H. 1926. “Notes on the study of English punctuation of the sixteenth century”. Review of English Studies 2 (6): 152-158. ↗
  21. Keiser, G. R. 1998. A manual of the writings in Middle English, 1050-1500, Vol. 10: Science and information. New Haven, CT: Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences. find
  22. Keiser, G. R. 2003. “Verse introductions to Middle English medical treatises”. English Studies 84 (4): 301-317. ↗
  23. Ker, N. R. 1969. Medieval manuscripts in British libraries: I London. Oxford: Clarendon. find
  24. Lucas, P. J. 1971. “Sense-units and the use of punctuation-markers in John Capgrave’s Chronicle”. Archivum Linguisticum 2: 3-24. find
  25. Marqués-Aguado, T. 2009. “Punctuation practice in the Antidotary in G.U.L. Ms Hunter 513 (ff. 37v - 96v)”. Miscelanea 39: 55-72. find
  26. Marqués-Aguado, T. 2011. “Depunctuating the Middle English Benvenutus Grassus: The cases of G.U.L. MSS Hunter 503 and 513”. Benvenutus Grassus’ On the well-proven art of the eye: Practica oculorum & De probatissima arte oculorum. Synoptic Edition and Philological Studies. Eds. A. Miranda-García and S. González Fernández-Corugedo. Bern: Peter Lang. 55-74 find
  27. Miranda García, A., Calle Martín, J., Moreno Olalla, D., González Fernández Corugedo, S. and G. D. Caie, comps. 2007-2014. The Málaga Corpus of Late Middle English Scientific Prose. <http://hunter.uma.es>. (Accessed 10 November 2017) ↗
  28. Mooney, L. R., Mosser, D. W., Solopova, E., Thorpe, D. and D. Hill Radcliffe, comps. nd. Digital Index of Middle English Verse. <http://www.dimev.net/index.html>. (Accessed 5 November 2017) ↗
  29. Moorat, S. A. J. 1962. Catalogue of western manuscripts on medicine and science in the Wellcome Historical Medical Library. Vol. 1. Catalogues written before 1650 AD. London: Publications of the Wellcome Historical Medical Library. find
  30. Moorman, C. 1975. Editing the Middle English manuscript. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi. find
  31. Obegi Gallardo, N. 2006. “Punctuation in a fifteenth-century scientific treatise (MS Cambridge L1.4.14.)”. Linguistica e Filologia 22: 99-114. ↗
  32. Parkes, M. B. 1992. Pause and effect. An introduction to the history of punctuation in the West. Aldershot, Hants: Scolar Press. find
  33. Petti, A. G. 1977. English literary hands from Chaucer to Dryden. London: Edward Arnold. find
  34. Rodríguez-Álvarez, A. 1999. “The role of punctuation in 15th-century vernacular deeds”. Folia Linguistica Historica 19 (1-2): 25-51. ↗
  35. Journal of English Studies, vol. 17 (2019) 233-251 find
  36. Rogos-Hebda, J. 2016. “The visual text: Bibliographic codes as pragmatic markers on a manuscript page”. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 51 (3): 37-44. ↗
  37. Stannard, J. 1982. “Rezeptliteratur as Fachliteratur”. Studies on medieval Fachliteratur: Proceedings of the special session on medieval Fachliteratur of the sixteenth International Congress on Medieval Studies. Ed. W. Eamon. Brussels: Omirel. 59-73. find
  38. Taavitsainen, I. 2001. “Middle English recipes. Genre characteristics, text type features and underlying traditions of writing”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2 (1): 85-113. find
  39. Tavormina, M. T. 2007. “The Middle English Letter of Ipocras”. English Studies 88 (6): 632-652. find
  40. Voigts, L. E. and P. Deery Kurtz. 2000. Scientific and medical writings in Old and Middle English: An electronic reference. Michigan, MI: University of Michigan Press. find
  41. Voigts, L. E. and P. Deery Kurtz. 2014. Scientific and medical writings in Old and Middle English: An electronic reference, rev. ed. Available at Voigts-Kurtz Search Program. University of Missouri, Kansas City. <http://cctr1.umkc.edu/ search>. (Accessed 10 December 2017) ↗
  42. Wellcome Library. nd. Wellcome Collection. Library Catalogue. <http://catalogue. wellcomelibrary.org>. (Accessed 3 November 2017) ↗
  43. Zeeman, E. 1956. “Punctuation in an early manuscript of Love’s Mirror”. Review of English Studies 7 (25): 11-18. ↗
  44. Journal of English Studies, vol. 17 (2019) 233-251 find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/marques-aguado-2019-analysis-punctuation-middle-english-letter/