Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2023 / Are Multilingual LLMs Culturally-Diverse Reasoners? An Investigation into Multicultural Proverbs and Sayings

Are Multilingual LLMs Culturally-Diverse Reasoners? An Investigation into Multicultural Proverbs and Sayings

Paper · 2023 · Chen Cecilia Liu, Fajri Koto, Timothy Baldwin et al.

Summary

This paper asks whether multilingual LLMs (mLLMs) can reason with culture-specific shared knowledge, using proverbs and sayings as the test case. The authors built MAPS (MulticulturAl Proverbs and Sayings), which spans six languages: Indonesian, Bengali, Russian, German, English, and Chinese (Mandarin). Proverbs and their explanations were taken from Wikiquote and Wiktionary. GPT-3.5 drafted short dialogues that use each proverb, and native speakers then accepted or rewrote them. Each item has a correct and an incorrect reading of the proverb in context, plus a label for whether the usage is figurative. Open-source models were evaluated on proverb memorization and on choosing the right interpretation. The models recall some proverbs, mostly English and Chinese ones, and recall grows with model size. However, recalling a proverb does not mean the model can interpret it in a dialogue. Figurative uses and inverted questions that ask for the wrong option are especially hard. Translated material also reveals a measurable culture gap. The results suggest that strong multilingual scores can hide weak cultural reasoning, which matters for any community whose common ground differs from English.

Key points

  • MAPS dataset (github.com/UKPLab/maps) contains four layers of annotation:
    • proverbs,
    • conversational contexts,
    • one correct and one incorrect interpretation for a binary-choice inference task,
    • figurative/non-figurative labels.
  • How contexts were created: contexts were model-in-the-loop seeds from gpt-3.5-turbo-0301.
    • English, Chinese, Russian and Bengali contexts were fully rewritten by annotators.
    • About 22% of Indonesian and 20.5% of German machine drafts were kept.
    • Russian and Bengali contexts were first written in English, then machine-translated and corrected by native speakers.
  • Models tested include BLOOMZ, mT0, XGLM, XLM-R and LLaMA-2. mT0-XXL (13B) performed best and showed limited culturally diverse reasoning.
  • Effect of scale: zero-shot inference improves with scale, but handling the "negative" question gets worse as models grow. Gaps between languages also widen with size.
  • Culture gap: the authors define it as |Acc_HT − max(Acc_Src, Acc_Tgt)|. For Chinese→English it is 5.73 for mT0 and 19.40 for LLaMA-2 13B. Machine translation often mistranslates proverbs, so human translation beats MT, and the difference between them is treated as the language gap.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

Cite

Cite as Chen Cecilia Liu, Fajri Koto, Timothy Baldwin and Iryna Gurevych. 2023. Are Multilingual LLMs Culturally-Diverse Reasoners? An Investigation into Multicultural Proverbs and Sayings. arXiv:2309.08591.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2309.08591 · arXiv 2309.08591

@misc{liu2023are,
  title = {{Are Multilingual LLMs Culturally-Diverse Reasoners? An Investigation into Multicultural Proverbs and Sayings}},
  author = {Chen Cecilia Liu, Fajri Koto, Timothy Baldwin and Iryna Gurevych},
  year = {2023},
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2309.08591},
  eprint = {2309.08591},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2309.08591}
}

References

51 references, 32 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Eduardo Blanco and Dan Moldovan. 2011. Semantic representation of negation using focus detection. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 581–589, Portland, Oregon, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  2. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Chri… — Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
  3. Yong Cao, Li Zhou, Seolhwa Lee, Laura Cabello, Min Chen, and Daniel Hershcovich. 2023. Assessing cross-cultural alignment between ChatGPT and human societies: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Cross-Cultural Considerations in NLP (C3NLP), pages 53–67, Dubrovnik, Croatia. As…
  4. Nicholas Carlini, Daphne Ippolito, Matthew Jagielski, Katherine Lee, Florian Tramèr, and Chiyuan Zhang. 2023. Quantifying memorization across neural language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023. OpenReview.net. find
  5. Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Katherine Lee, Adam Roberts, Tom B. Brown, Dawn Song, Úlfar Erlingsson, Alina Oprea, and Colin Raffel. 2021. Extracting training data from large language models. In 30th USENIX Security Symposium, USENIX Security…
  6. Tuhin Chakrabarty, Arkadiy Saakyan, Debanjan Ghosh, and Smaranda Muresan. 2022. FLUTE: Figurative language understanding through textual explanations. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 7139–7159, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Associat…
  7. Alexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary, Guillaume Wenzek, Francisco Guzmán, Edouard Grave, Myle Ott, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2020. Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association fo…
  8. Alexis Conneau and Guillaume Lample. 2019. Cross-lingual language model pretraining. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, December 8-14, 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pages 7057–7067. find
  9. Alexis Conneau, Ruty Rinott, Guillaume Lample, Adina Williams, Samuel Bowman, Holger Schwenk, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2018. XNLI: Evaluating cross-lingual sentence representations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2475–2485, Brussels, Bel… find
  10. Fangxiaoyu Feng, Yinfei Yang, Daniel Cer, Naveen Arivazhagan, and Wei Wang. 2022. Language-agnostic BERT sentence embedding. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 878–891, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computation…
  11. Sayan Ghosh and Shashank Srivastava. 2022. ePiC: Employing proverbs in context as a benchmark for abstract language understanding. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3989–4004, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Com… find
  12. Katharina Haemmerl, Bjoern Deiseroth, Patrick Schramowski, Jindřich Libovický, Constantin Rothkopf, Alexander Fraser, and Kristian Kersting. 2023. Speaking multiple languages affects the moral bias of language models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 213… find
  13. Adi Haviv, Ido Cohen, Jacob Gidron, Roei Schuster, Yoav Goldberg, and Mor Geva. 2023. Understanding transformer memorization recall through idioms. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 248–264, Dubrovnik, Croatia. Assoc…
  14. Daniel Hershcovich, Stella Frank, Heather Lent, Miryam de Lhoneux, Mostafa Abdou, Stephanie Brandl, Emanuele Bugliarello, Laura Cabello Piqueras, Ilias Chalkidis, Ruixiang Cui, Constanza Fierro, Katerina Margatina, Phillip Rust, and Anders Søgaard. 2022. Challenges and strategies in cross-cultural N…
  15. Richard P Honeck. 2013. A proverb in mind: The cognitive science of proverbial wit and wisdom. Psychology Press. find
  16. Dirk Hovy and Diyi Yang. 2021. The importance of modeling social factors of language: Theory and practice. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 588–602, Online. Association for Computa…
  17. Jennifer Hu, Sammy Floyd, Olessia Jouravlev, Evelina Fedorenko, and Edward Gibson. 2023. A fine-grained comparison of pragmatic language understanding in humans and language models. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pa…
  18. Jie Huang and Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang. 2023. Towards reasoning in large language models: A survey. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 1049–1065, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  19. Jing Huang and Diyi Yang. 2023. Culturally aware natural language inference. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pages 7591–7609, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  20. Pratik Joshi, Sebastin Santy, Amar Budhiraja, Kalika Bali, and Monojit Choudhury. 2020. The state and fate of linguistic diversity and inclusion in the NLP world. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 6282–6293, Online. Association for Comp…
  21. Anubha Kabra, Emmy Liu, Simran Khanuja, Alham Fikri Aji, Genta Winata, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Anuoluwapo Aremu, Perez Ogayo, and Graham Neubig. 2023. Multi-lingual and multi-cultural figurative language understanding. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 8269–82… find
  22. Nora Kassner and Hinrich Schütze. 2020. Negated and misprimed probes for pretrained language models: Birds can talk, but cannot fly. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 7811–7818, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  23. Fajri Koto, Nurul Aisyah, Haonan Li, and Timothy Baldwin. 2023. Large language models only pass primary school exams in Indonesia: A comprehensive test on IndoMMLU. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 12359–12374, Singapore. Association fo… find
  24. Claire Kramsch. 2014. Language and culture. AILA Review, 27(1):30–55. find
  25. Haonan Li, Fajri Koto, Minghao Wu, Alham Fikri Aji, and Timothy Baldwin. 2023a. Bactrian-X: A multilingual replicable instruction-following model with low-rank adaptation. CoRR, abs/2305.15011.
  26. Haonan Li, Yixuan Zhang, Fajri Koto, Yifei Yang, Hai Zhao, Yeyun Gong, Nan Duan, and Timothy Baldwin. 2023b. CMMLU: measuring massive multitask language understanding in chinese. CoRR, abs/2306.09212.
  27. Xi Victoria Lin, Todor Mihaylov, Mikel Artetxe, Tianlu Wang, Shuohui Chen, Daniel Simig, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Shruti Bhosale, Jingfei Du, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Sam Shleifer, Punit Singh Koura, Vishrav Chaudhary, Brian O’Horo, Jeff Wang, Luke Zettlemoyer, Zornitsa Kozareva, Mona T. Diab, Veselin Stoy… — Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Language Models
  28. Alisa Liu, Zhaofeng Wu, Julian Michael, Alane Suhr, Peter West, Alexander Koller, Swabha Swayamdipta, Noah Smith, and Yejin Choi. 2023. We’re afraid language models aren’t modeling ambiguity. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 790–807, Si…
  29. Emmy Liu, Chenxuan Cui, Kenneth Zheng, and Graham Neubig. 2022. Testing the ability of language models to interpret figurative language. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 4437–4452,…
  30. Fangyu Liu, Emanuele Bugliarello, Edoardo Maria Ponti, Siva Reddy, Nigel Collier, and Desmond Elliott. 2021. Visually grounded reasoning across languages and cultures. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 10467–10485, Online and Punta Cana,… find
  31. Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. 2019. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 6-9, 2019. OpenReview.net. find
  32. Inbal Magar and Roy Schwartz. 2022. Data contamination: From memorization to exploitation. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 157–165, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics. find
  33. Olga Majewska, Evgeniia Razumovskaia, Edoardo M. Ponti, Ivan Vulić, and Anna Korhonen. 2023. Cross-lingual dialogue dataset creation via outline-based generation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 11:139–156.
  34. Wolfgang Mieder. 2004. Proverbs: A handbook. Greenwood Publishing Group. find
  35. Niklas Muennighoff, Thomas Wang, Lintang Sutawika, Adam Roberts, Stella Biderman, Teven Le Scao, M Saiful Bari, Sheng Shen, Zheng Xin Yong, Hailey Schoelkopf, Xiangru Tang, Dragomir Radev, Alham Fikri Aji, Khalid Almubarak, Samuel Albanie, Zaid Alyafeai, Albert Webson, Edward Raff, and Colin Raffel.… — Crosslingual Generalization through Multitask Finetuning
  36. Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll L. Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, John Schulman, Jacob Hilton, Fraser Kelton, Luke Miller, Maddie Simens, Amanda Askell, Peter Welinder, Paul F. Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan Lowe. 2022.… — Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
  37. Alec Radford, Jeff Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI. find
  38. Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. 2020. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21:140:1–140:67.
  39. Laura Ruis, Akbir Khan, Stella Biderman, Sara Hooker, Tim Rocktäschel, and Edward Grefenstette. 2023. The Goldilocks of pragmatic understanding: Fine-tuning strategy matters for implicature resolution by LLMs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36.
  40. Omar Shaikh, Caleb Ziems, William Held, Aryan Pariani, Fred Morstatter, and Diyi Yang. 2023. Modeling cross-cultural pragmatic inference with codenames duet. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 6550– 6569, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Lingu…
  41. Jingyuan S. She, Christopher Potts, Samuel R. Bowman, and Atticus Geiger. 2023. ScoNe: Benchmarking negation reasoning in language models with fine-tuning and in-context learning. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pag… find
  42. Shruti Bhosale, Dan Bikel, Lukas Blecher, Cristian Canton-Ferrer, Moya Chen, Guillem Cucurull, David Esiobu, Jude Fernandes, Jeremy Fu, Wenyin Fu, Brian Fuller, Cynthia Gao, Vedanuj Goswami, Naman Goyal, Anthony Hartshorn, Saghar Hosseini, Rui Hou, Hakan Inan, Marcin Kardas, Viktor Kerkez, Madian Kh… — Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models
  43. Thinh Hung Truong, Timothy Baldwin, Karin Verspoor, and Trevor Cohn. 2023. Language models are not naysayers: an analysis of language models on negation benchmarks. In Proceedings of the 12th Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM 2023), pages 101–114, Toronto, Canada. Associa…
  44. Ahmet Üstün, Viraat Aryabumi, Zheng Xin Yong, Wei-Yin Ko, Daniel D’souza, Gbemileke Onilude, Neel Bhandari, Shivalika Singh, Hui-Lee Ooi, Amr Kayid, Freddie Vargus, Phil Blunsom, Shayne Longpre, Niklas Muennighoff, Marzieh Fadaee, Julia Kreutzer, and Sara Hooker. 2024. Aya model: An instruction fine…
  45. Laurens van der Maaten and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2012. Visualizing non-metric similarities in multiple maps. Machine Learning, 87(1):33–55. find
  46. Bin Wang, Zhengyuan Liu, Xin Huang, Fangkai Jiao, Yang Ding, Ai Ti Aw, and Nancy F. Chen. 2023. SeaEval for multilingual foundation models: From cross-lingual alignment to cultural reasoning. CoRR, abs/2309.04766.
  47. Geoffrey M White. 1987. Proverbs and cultural models: An American psychology of problem solving. Cambridge University Press. find
  48. Jenny Thomas. 1983. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied linguistics, 4(2):91–112. find
  49. Yinfei Yang, Yuan Zhang, Chris Tar, and Jason Baldridge. 2019. PAWS-X: A cross-lingual adversarial dataset for paraphrase identification. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processin…
  50. Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Binwei Yao, Ming Jiang, Diyi Yang, and Junjie Hu. 2023. Empowering LLM-based machine translation with cultural awareness. CoRR, abs/2305.14328.
  51. Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zi Lin, Zhuohan Li, Dacheng Li, Eric Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. 2023. Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-bench and chatbot arena. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing…

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/liu-2023-multilingual-llms-culturally-diverse-reasoners/