🔗 Who cites «MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild»

60 papers of our library cite it (of the 141,840 whose bibliographies we read) · 7 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wild»

1. Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?arXiv:2303.11156Vinu Sankar Sadasivan, Aounon Kumar, Sriram Balasubramanian, et al.2023 · 302 citations
   RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text DetectorsAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Liam Dugan, Alyssa Hwang, Filip Trhlík, et al.2024 · 110 citations
2. The Arabic AI Fingerprint: Stylometric Analysis and Detection of Large Language Models TextarXiv:2505.23276Maged S. Al-Shaibani, Moataz Ahmed2025 · 7 citations
   Spotlights and Blindspots: Evaluating Machine-Generated Text DetectionLanguage Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)Kevin Stowe, Kailash Patil2026 · 1 citation
   GhostWriter: Hidden AI-Generated Texts over Multiple Languages, Domains and GeneratorsLanguage Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)Manuel Schaaf, Kevin Bönisch, Alexander Mehler2026
   SearchLLM: Detecting LLM Paraphrased Text by Measuring the Similarity with Regeneration of the Candidate Source via Search EngineConference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL)Hoang-Quoc Nguyen-Son, Minh-Son Dao, Koji Zettsu2026
   What Are LLMs Doing to Scientific Communication? Measuring Changes in Writing Practices and Reading ExperienceLanguage Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)Filip Miletić, Neele Falk2026

53 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/li-2024-mage-machine-generated-text-detection/cited-by/