Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / An Empirical Comparison of Parsing Methods for… / cited by

Who cites «An Empirical Comparison of Parsing Methods for Stanford Dependencies»

13 papers of our library cite it (of the 140,884 whose bibliographies we read) · 3 with a page here, the most cited first · ← the paper

  1. A Fast and Accurate Dependency Parser using Neural NetworksDanqi Chen, Christopher Manning2014 · 2,301 citations
  2. A Dependency Parser for TweetsLingpeng Kong, Nathan Schneider, Swabha Swayamdipta, et al.2014 · 298 citations
  3. An Evaluation of Parser Robustness for Ungrammatical SentencesHoma B. Hashemi, Rebecca Hwa2016 · 18 citations

10 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kong-2014-empirical-comparison-parsing-methods-stanford/cited-by/