Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2023 / Systematisation and margins of the translation of the sciences of the ancient into Arabic

Systematisation and margins of the translation of the sciences of the ancient into Arabic

Paper · 2023 · Tagourramt El Kbaich, Abdallah

Summary

This is a historical, critical study of how the Arab-Islamic world turned the transfer of "sciences of the ancients" (mainly Greek, also Indo-Iranian learning) into an organised enterprise in the Middle Ages, and where that enterprise reached its limits. It is not an empirical or computational paper. It works through close reading of classical Arabic sources and modern scholarship. The argument follows four steps:

  1. Caliph al-Ma'mūn's reported dream of Aristotle, read as the symbolic starting point of the first state translation project.
  2. al-Ŷāḥiz's previously unpublished ideas about translation, which served that project.
  3. The link between those ideas and the Mu'tazilī doctrine, which the Abbasid authorities adopted to speed up the transfer.
  4. The ideological reasons translation declined in the Islamic East, after which its accumulated output became raw material for a translation circle in al-Andalus that passed the knowledge on to Latin Europe.

The paper matters because it frames translation as a tool of politics and identity-building, not as neutral linguistic transfer.

Key points

  • Two kinds of science. Following Samsó, the paper separates native Arab-Islamic sciences (religion, language, literature) from inherited ʻulūm al-awā'il. The inherited group covers exact and natural sciences, medicine, mechanical engineering (ʻilm al-ḥiyal) and philosophy.
  • Practical motives. Abbasid patrons such as al-Manṣūr (754–775) and al-Ma'mūn (813–833) had concrete reasons for sponsoring translation. Aḥmad Amīn links al-Manṣūr's interest in medicine to his stomach complaints and notes his belief in astrology.
  • The dream story. It comes from Ibn al-Nadīm's al-Fihrist, written roughly 150 years after al-Ma'mūn died. In it, Aristotle ranks what is best: first what reason approves, then what sharia approves, then what people approve.
  • Translation as contested ground. In the codification era (ʻaṣr al-tadwīn, 8th–9th c.), some groups used translation to Islamise the cultural record. Persian and Syriac translators used it to insert their own heritage into the dominant culture.
  • Timeline. The eastern movement is assumed to have ended around the late 10th to early 11th century. Its legacy then moved westward via al-Andalus.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. The author does not ask whether the dream really happened; he asks what the narrative was meant to justify, treating a source as evidence of its context.
  • I2. The roughly 150-year gap between the event and its written record is treated as analytically important in itself.
  • I3. The dream sets up an explicit ranking of authorities (reason, then religious law, then public opinion) for deciding what is best.
  • I4. Samsó's split between native and inherited sciences tags each piece of knowledge with its provenance.
  • I5. The author chose a fixed, scholarly transliteration scheme to keep the exact form of names and terms from the sources.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (frames): Speech-act and stance analysis could tag reported stories with their apparent purpose (legitimising, persuading) separately from their truth value.
  • I2 (world): The text world could store event time and report time as distinct attributes, so answers can flag claims recorded long after the fact.
  • I3 (learn): Disagreements among witness parsers or teacher tiers could be settled by a declared, inspectable priority order, which keeps the arbitration explainable.
  • I4 (world): The compiled knowledge layer could record where each fact came from (WordNet, FrameNet, Wikidata, induced), making trust and conflict tracing explicit.
  • I5 (tokens): A stable normalisation policy for diacritic-bearing foreign names would keep lemmas and entity links consistent across texts.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

Cite

Cite as Tagourramt El Kbaich, Abdallah. 2023. Systematisation and margins of the translation of the sciences of the ancient into Arabic. MonTI. Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.6035/monti.2023.15.09

@inproceedings{abdallah2023systematisation,
  title = {{Systematisation and margins of the translation of the sciences of the ancient into Arabic}},
  author = {Tagourramt {El Kbaich, Abdallah}},
  booktitle = {MonTI. Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación},
  year = {2023},
  doi = {10.6035/monti.2023.15.09},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.6035/monti.2023.15.09}
}

References

31 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. ‘A bd al -Ḥ am ī d , Muṣtafā. (1978) “Naẓariyyat al-Ŷāḥiẓ fī al-tarŷama.” Al-Mawrid 7:4, pp. 42-50. find
  2. A donis , ‘Alī Aḥmad Sa‘īd. (1979) Al-Ṯābit wa-l-Mutaḥawwil II: baḥt fī al-ittibā‘ wa-l-ibdā‘ ‘inda al-‘arab. Beirut: Dār al-‘Awda. find
  3. A donis , ‘Alī Aḥmad Sa‘īd. (1994) Al-Ṯābit wa-l-mutaḥawwil I: baḥṯ fī-l-ittibāʻ wa-l-ibdāʻ ʻinda al-ʻarab. Beirut: Dār al-Sāqī. al -ʻ arwi , ʻAbd Allāh. (1995) al-Aydiyūlūŷiyā al-ʻarabiyya al-muʻāṣira. Casablanca: al-Markaz al-Ṯaqāfī al-ʻArabī. find
  4. A lbrecht , Sarah. (2018) “Dār al-Islām and dār al-ḥarb”. En: Fleet, Kate et alii (eds.) 2018. Encyclopaedia of Islam, v. 3. Versión electrónica: <http://dx.doi. org.sire.ub.edu/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_25867>. al -G az ā l ī, Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad. (1966) Tahāfut al-falāsifa. Edición de Sulaymān Dunyā. El Cairo: Dār al-Maʻārif. al -M urr ā kuš ī, ‘Abd al-Wāḥid. (1949) Al-Mu‘ŷib fī taljīṣ ajbār al-Magrib. Edición de Muḥammad Sa‘īd al-‘Aryān y Muḥammad al-‘Arabī al-‘Alamī. El Cairo: Maṭba‘at al-Istiqāma. al -Ṣ abb ā g , Ramadán. (1998) Al-‘Ilm ‘inda al-‘arab wa aṯaruhu ‘alā al-ḥaḍāra al-ūrūbiyya. Alejandría: Dār al-Wafā’ li-l-Ṭibā‘a wa-l-Našr wa-l-Tawzī‘. al -S i ŷ ist ā n ī, Abū Sulaymān. (1974) Ṯalāṯ rasā’il. Edición de ʻAbd al-Raḥmān Badawī. Teherán: Bonyad-e Farhang-e. al -Ŷā bir ī, Muḥammad ‘Ābid. (2000) Naqd al-‘aql al-‘arabī II: binyat al-‘aql al-‘arabī. Casablanca: Dār al-Našr al-Magribiyya. al -Ŷā bir ī, Muḥammad ‘Ābid. (2001) Naqd al-‘aql al-‘arabī IV: al-‘aql al-ajlāqī al-‘arabī. Casablanca: Dār al-Našr al-Magribiyya. al -Ŷā bir ī, Muḥammad ‘Ābid. (2009) Naqd al-‘aql al-‘arabī I: takwīn al-‘aql al-‘arabī. Beirut: Dār al-Ṭalī‘a. al -Ŷāḥ i ẓ, Abū ‘Uṯmān. (1965) Kitāb al-ḥayawān I. Edición de ʻAbd al-Salām Muḥammad Hārūn. El Cairo: Šarikat Maktabat wa Maṭbaʻat Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa Awlāduh. al -Ŷāḥ i ẓ, Abū ‘Uṯmān. (1998) Kitāb al-bayān wa-l-tabyīn III. Edición de ‘Abd al-Salām Muḥammad Hārūn. El Cairo: Maktabat al-Jānŷī. ↗
  5. A m ī n , Aḥmad. (2011 [1928]) Faŷr al-islām. El Cairo: Hindāwī. Versión electrónica: <https://www.hindawi.org/books/92024806/>. ↗
  6. B uhl , Frants. (1990) “Milla.” En: Bosworth, Clifford Edmund et alii (eds.) 1990. Encyclopédie de l’Islam: nouvelle édition. Leiden & París: Brill & Maisonneuve & Larose, vol. 7, p. 61. find
  7. C haumont , Éric. (1995) “Salaf.” En: Bosworth, Clifford Edmund et alii (eds.) 1990. Encyclopédie de l’Islam: nouvelle édition. Leiden & París: Brill & Maisonneuve & Larose, vol. 8, pp. 930-931. find
  8. F arruj , ‘Omar. (1947) Al-Falsafa al-yūnāniyya fī ṭarīqihā ilā al-‘arab. Beirut: Maṭba‘at al-Naŷma. find
  9. G abrieli , Francesco. (1960) “‘Adjam”. En: Gibb, Hamilton et alii (eds.) 1960. Encyclopédie de l’Islam. nouvelle édition. Leiden & París: Brill & Maisonneuve & Larose, vol. 1, p. 212. find
  10. G arcía Y ebra , Valentín. (1985) Traducción y enriquecimiento de la lengua del traductor. Madrid: Gráficas Cóndor. find
  11. G imaret , Daniel. (1992) “Mu‘tazila.” En: Bosworth, Clifford ; Edmund et alii (eds.) 1992. Encyclopédie de l’Islam: nouvelle édition. Leiden & París: Brill & Maisonneuve & Larose, vol. 7, pp. 785-795. find
  12. G oldziher , Ignaz. (1965) “Dŷāhiliyya.” En: Lewis, Bernard et alii (eds.) 1965. Encyclopédie de l’Islam. Nouvelle édition. Leiden & París: Brill & Maisonneuve & Larose, vol. 2, pp. 393-394. find
  13. G utas , Dimitri. (1998) Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: the Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ‘Abbāsid Society (2nd-4th/8th-10th centuries). Londres: Routledge. find
  14. I bn al -N ad ī m , Abū al-Faraŷ Muḥammad. (s. f.) al-Fihrist. Beirut: Dār al-Maʻrifa li-l-Ṭibāʻa wa-l-Našr. I bn J aldún , ʻAbd al-Raḥmān. (s. f.) Al-Muqaddima I: kitāb al-ʻibar wa dīwān al-Mubtada’ wa-l-jabar fī ayyām al-ʻarab wa-l-ʻaŷam. Beirut: Dār al-Ŷīl. I bn R ušd , Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad. (1987) Tahāfut al-tahāfut. Edición de Maurice Bouyges. Beirut: Dār al-Mašriq. find
  15. ‘I tm ā n , Aḥmad. (2013) al-Munŷaz al-‘arabī al-islāmī fī al-tarŷama wa ḥiwār al-ṯaqāfāt min Bagdād ilā Ṭulayṭila. El Cairo: al-Hay’a al-Miṣriyya al-‘Āmma li-l-Kitāb. find
  16. Kī l īṯū, ‘Abd al-Fattāḥ. (2002) Lan tatakallama lugatī. Beirut: Dār al-Ṭalī‘a. find
  17. K ilito , Abdelfettah. (2018) Hablo todas las lenguas, pero en árabe. Traducción de Marta Cerezales Laforet. Santander: El Desvelo Ediciones. find
  18. M enéndez P idal , Ramón. (2001) Islam y cristiandad: España entre las dos culturas. Edición de Álvaro Galmes de Fuentes. Málaga: Universidad de Málaga. find
  19. M onferrer S ala , Juan Pedro. (2000) “La labor polemista de los cristianos orientales y su contribución a la difusión del saber en el oriente musulmán.” Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 7, pp. 61-79. Versión electrónica: <https://helvia.uco.es/xmlui/handle/10396/22424>. ↗
  20. R eal A cademia E spañola . Diccionario de la Lengua Española. Versión electrónica: <https://dle.rae.es> R eiss , Katharina & Hans J. Vermeer. (1996 [1984]) Fundamentos para una teoría funcional de la traducción. Traducción de Sandra García & Celia Martín. Madrid: Ediciones Akal. ↗
  21. R enan , Ernest. (1866) Averroès et l’averroïsme: essai historique. París: Michel Lévy Frères Libraires. find
  22. ṢĀʻ id al -A ndalus ī, Abū al-Qāsim. (1912) Kitāb Ṭabaqāt al-umam. Edición de Louis Cheikho. Beirut: al-Maktaba al-Kāṯūlīkiyya li-l-Ābā’ al-Yasū‘iyyīn. Versión electrónica: <http://dlib.nyu.edu/aco/book/columbia_aco003315/1> ↗
  23. S alama -C arr , Myriam. (1990) La traduction à l’époque abbasside. París: Didier Érudition. find
  24. S aliba , George. (2007) Islamic Science and the Making of the European Renaissance. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. find
  25. S amso , Julio. (2011) Las Ciencias de los Antiguos en al-Ándalus. Almería: Fundación Ibn Tufayl de Estudios árabes. find
  26. T agourramt E l K baich , Abdallah. (2020) “La traducción al árabe entre la mediación lingüística y la difícil asimilación cultural en el periodo abasí.” Trans. Revista de Traductología 24, pp. 435-452. Versión electrónica: <https://doi.org/10.24310/TRANS.2020.v0i24.8195> ↗
  27. Ṭ ar ā b ī š ī, Georges. (2006) Harṭaqāt: ʻan al-dīmuqrāṭiyya wa-l-ʻilmāniyya wal-ḥa-dāṯa wa-l-mumānaʻa al-ʻarabiyya. Beirut: Dār al-Sāqī. find
  28. T oury , Gideon. (2004 [1995]) Los estudios descriptivos de traducción y más allá. Traducción y edición de Rosa Rabadán & Raquel Merino. Madrid: Cátedra. find
  29. U rvoy , Dominique. (2005) “Ibn Rushd et le pouvoir almohadeˮ. En: Bazzana, André et alii (eds.) 2005. Averroès et l’averroïsme. Leyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon, pp. 121-130. find
  30. V ernet , Juan. (1999) Lo que Europa debe al Islam de España. Barcelona: El Acantilado. find
  31. W illiams , Raymond. (2001 [1980]) Cultura y sociedad: 1780-1950. Traducción de Horacio Pons. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Visión. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/kbaich-2023-systematisation-margins-translation-sciences-ancient/