🔗 Who cites «Trust or Escalate: LLM Judges with Provable Guarantees for Human Agreement»

19 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 5 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Trust or Escalate: LLM Judges with Provable Guarantees for Human Agreement»

1. LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation MethodsarXiv:2412.05579Haitao Li, Qian Dong, Junjie Chen, et al.2024 · 195 citations
2. The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMsAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Nitay Calderon, Roi Reichart, Rotem Dror2025 · 52 citations
3. A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic SystemsarXiv:2504.09037Zixuan Ke, Fangkai Jiao, Yifei Ming, et al.2025 · 39 citations
4. When One LLM Drools, Multi-LLM Collaboration RulesAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Shangbin Feng, Wenxuan Ding, Alisa Liu, et al.2026 · 14 citations
5. Calibrating LLM Judges: Linear Probes for Fast and Reliable Uncertainty EstimationAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Bhaktipriya Radharapu, Eshika Saxena, Kenneth Li, et al.2026

14 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/jung-2024-trust-escalate-llm-judges-provable/cited-by/