🔗 Who cites «Can Language Models Reason about Individualistic Human Values and Preferences?»

20 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 7 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Can Language Models Reason about Individualistic Human Values and Preferences?»

1. Language Model Fine-Tuning on Scaled Survey Data for Predicting Distributions of Public OpinionsAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Joseph Suh, Erfan Jahanparast, Suhong Moon, et al.2025 · 28 citations
2. Mind the Value-Action Gap: Do LLMs Act in Alignment with Their Values?Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Hua Shen, Nicholas Clark, Tanu Mitra2025 · 16 citations
3. Value Profiles for Encoding Human VariationConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Taylor Sorensen, Pushkar Mishra, Roma Patel, et al.2025 · 15 citations
4. CuMA: Aligning LLMs with Sparse Cultural Values via Demographic-Aware Mixture of AdaptersAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Ao Sun, Xiaoyu Wang, Zhe Tan, et al.2026 · 1 citation
5. ExpertIVS: Sociological Expert Driven Individual Value Simulation in Large Language ModelsFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsZhen Wang, Yuqi Ren, Yuehan Cui, et al.2026
6. V-RoLoRA: RLVR-Driven MoE Routing for Steerable Pluralistic AlignmentFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsJing Wang, Yaomin Wu, Yinglin Wang, et al.2026
7. Who Speaks for Whom? LLM-Generated Survey Data as a Proxy for Public OpinionWorkshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social ScienceRadhakrishnan Venkatakrishnan, Travis Brodbeck, Michael D. Young2026

13 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/jiang-2025-can-language-models-reason-about/cited-by/