Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2022 / Large-Scale Acoustic Characterization of Singaporean Children's English Pronunciation

Large-Scale Acoustic Characterization of Singaporean Children's English Pronunciation

Paper · 2022 · Yuling Gu and Nancy F. Chen

Summary

Singapore English is an outer-circle variety. It has rarely been studied acoustically, and most earlier work relied on anecdotes or a handful of adult speakers. This paper measures how Singaporean children pronounce English relative to American and British children, using a much larger sample than earlier studies. The authors collected read speech from children aged 6–13 in all three populations. They force-aligned the recordings and extracted per-phoneme formants, F0 and duration with Praat. Selected vowel pairs and the approximants /l/ and /r/ were then explored with k-means and Archetypal analysis, and detailed acoustic comparisons followed. The resulting profile is mixed:

  • Like British children: Singaporean children show little rhoticity in syllable-final /r/.
  • Like American children: they front their vowels in a similar way.
  • Unlike either group: their vowel height, tense–lax contrasts and syllable-final /l/ differ from both reference groups.

The work suggests the variety draws on more than its British institutional standard, possibly through media exposure and local languages such as Malay and Chinese. This matters for speech recognition and computer-assisted language learning aimed at children.

Key points

  • Three corpora of children's read speech:

    • American: 140 speakers, 43,406 utterances
    • British: 95 speakers, 32,542 utterances
    • Singaporean: 193 speakers, 34,457 utterances

    Reading material drew on TIMIT, PF-STAR, the GMU Speech Accent Archive and custom minimal-pair sentences.

  • Processing pipeline:

    • Features were F1–F4, F0 and duration, sampled every 10 ms and averaged per phoneme.
    • A spot-check confirmed that the forced-alignment boundaries were accurate to within 50 ms.
    • Tokens that were silent, lacked formant values or lasted longer than 1 s were discarded.
    • Data were averaged to one point per speaker per phoneme.
  • Archetypal analysis used p = 2, chosen by an elbow on the residual sum of squares. K-means gave similar trends.

  • Syllable position was assigned with a syllabified CMU Pronouncing Dictionary 0.6. Vocal-tract differences were normalized with the Nordstroem and Lindblom model.

  • For TRAP–BATH vowels, more than 60% of each Singaporean vowel category fell into a single cluster. American and British vowels separated more cleanly. In Singaporean syllable-final /l/, F1 and F2 are further apart than in the other groups, and the F2–F3 gap is smaller.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. Archetypal analysis describes each data point as a convex mixture of extreme "pure types", which lets two well-known varieties act as anchors for locating a third one between or outside them.
  • I2. Unsupervised clustering is used only to suggest where differences might lie, and every suggestion is then checked with targeted, interpretable measurements rather than taken at face value.
  • I3. The authors trust a pattern only when two different methods (k-means and Archetypal analysis) show the same trend.
  • I4. Tokens are averaged per speaker and per phoneme after normalizing for vocal-tract length, so that prolific speakers or anatomical differences do not masquerade as group differences.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (tree): Treebanks in different UD dialects could be placed as mixtures of two reference conventions, showing which conversion rules a new treebank actually needs.
  • I2 (learn): Clusters of parser disagreements could flag candidate phenomena, and each candidate would then be confirmed by explicit tests before any repair rule is induced.
  • I3 (learn): This mirrors agreement among witness parsers: a silver label or an evaluation conclusion would be kept only when independent methods converge.
  • I4 (answer): Test scores could be aggregated per source text or per course and normalized for text length, so that one long fable does not dominate the reported accuracy.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

 Fields, topics and concepts

Cite

Cite as Yuling Gu and Nancy F. Chen. 2022. Large-Scale Acoustic Characterization of Singaporean Children's English Pronunciation. arXiv:2202.09108.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2202.09108 · arXiv 2202.09108

@misc{gu2022large,
  title = {{Large-Scale Acoustic Characterization of Singaporean Children's English Pronunciation}},
  author = {Yuling Gu and Nancy F. Chen},
  year = {2022},
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2202.09108},
  eprint = {2202.09108},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2202.09108}
}

References

66 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. B. Kachru, The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1982. find
  2. C. L. Kuo, Formant transitions in varied utterance positions., Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics 65 4 (2013) 178–84. find
  3. C. G. Clopper, D. B. Pisoni, Free classification of regional dialects of American English, Journal of phonetics 35 3 (2007) 421–438. find
  4. N. F. Chen, W. Shen, J. Campbell, R. Schwartz, Large-Scale Analysis of Formant Frequency Estimation Variability in Conversational Telephone Speech, in: INTERSPEECH 2009, 2009, pp. 2203–2206. find
  5. W. Labov, S. Ash, C. Boberg, The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change : a multimedia reference tool, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 2006. find
  6. K. Evanini, Classifying and Clustering Dialects of North American English, Presented at North East Student Colloquium on Artificial Intelligence (NESCAI) (2008). find
  7. N. F. Chen, S. W. Tam, W. Shen, J. P. Campbell, Characterizing Phonetic Transformations and Acoustic Differences Across English Dialects, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 22 (2014) 110–124. find
  8. N. F. Chen, Characterizing phonetic transformations and fine-grained acoustic differences across dialects, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 2011. find
  9. J. Tauberer, K. Evanini, Intrinsic vowel duration and the post-vocalic voicing effect: Some evidence from dialects of North American English, in: INTERSPEECH, 2009, pp. 2211–2214. find
  10. C. G. Henton, Changes in the vowels of received pronunciation, Journal of Phonetics 11 (1983) 353–371. find
  11. E. Grabe, B. Post, Intonational Variation in the British Isles, in: Speech Prosody 2002 Aix-en-Provence, France, April 11-13, 2002, pp. 343–346. find
  12. J. C. Wells, British English pronunciation preferences: A changing scene, Journal of the International Phonetic Association 29 (1999) 33– 50. find
  13. E. L. Low, E. Grabe, A contrastive study of lexical stress placement in Singapore English and British English, in: ICSLP, 1998. find
  14. A. Khan, S. A. M. Alzobidy, Vowel Variation Between American English and British English, International Journal of English Linguistics 9 (2019) 350–356. find
  15. P. Gomez, British and American English Pronunciation Differences, Cambridge: Mayflower Press (2009) 3–8. find
  16. L. Alsagoff, Society, Style and Structure in Language : The Grammar of Singapore English, Singapore: Prentice Hall, 1998. find
  17. J. Wong, The particles of Singapore English: a semantic and cultural interpretation, Journal of Pragmatics 36 (2004) 739–793. find
  18. L. E. Ling, E. Grabe, F. Nolan, Quantitative Characterizations of Speech Rhythm: Syllable-Timing in Singapore English, Language and Speech 43 (2000) 377–401. find
  19. E. Grabe, B. S. Rosner, J. E. Garcı́a-Albea, X. Zhou, Perception of English Intonation by English, Spanish, and Chinese Listeners, Language and Speech 46 (2003) 375–401. find
  20. Y. K. Liang, Rhythm in Singaporean English : an instrumental study (1986). find
  21. D. Deterding, R. Hvitfeldt, The Features of Singapore English Pronunciation: Implications for Teachers, Teaching and Learning 15 (1994) 98–107. find
  22. J. Foley, New Englishes : the case of Singapore, Singapore University Press, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 1988. find
  23. D. Deterding, L. E. Ling, The NIE Corpus of Spoken Singapore English (NIECSSE), SAAL Qarterly (2001) 2–5. URL: http://videoweb.nie.edu.sg/phonetic/niecsse/index.htm. ↗
  24. D. Deterding, Singapore English, Edinburgh University Press, 2007. find
  25. P. K. W. Tan, English in Singapore, International Journal of Language, Translation and Intercultural Communication 1 (2012) 123–138. find
  26. Y. Gu, N. F. Chen, Characterization of Singaporean Children’s English: Comparisons to American and British Counterparts Using Archetypal Analysis, in: INTERSPEECH, 2020. find
  27. Y. Gu, N. Chen, Acoustic Characterization of Singaporean Children’s English: Comparisons to American and British Counterparts, in: Extended abstract. WiNLP@ACL, 2019. find
  28. Y. Gu, N. F. Chen, Large-scale acoustic characterization of mid-low vowels across American, British, and Singaporean children, Abstract at the Acoustical Society of America (2019). find
  29. Y. Gu, N. F. Chen, Acoustic characterization of Singaporean children’s English with American and British counterparts: A case study on approximants, Abstract at the Acoustical Society of America (2019). find
  30. S. Malmasi, K. Evanini, A. Cahill, J. Tetreault, R. Pugh, C. Hamill, D. Napolitano, Y. Qian, A Report on the 2017 Native Language Identification Shared Task, in: Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, Association for Computational Linguistics, 201North American English7, pp. 62–75. find
  31. K. Livescu, Analysis and Modeling of Non-Native Speech for Automatic Speech Recognition, Ph.D. thesis, MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1999. find
  32. K. Livescu, J. R. Glass, Lexical modeling of non-native speech for automatic speech recognition, in: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2000, pp. 1683–1686. find
  33. S. Bakst, C. A. Niziolek, SELF-CORRECTION IN L1 AND L2 VOWEL PRODUCTION, in: Proceedings of ICPhS 2019, 2019. find
  34. R. Tong, B. P. Lim, N. F. Chen, B. Ma, H. Li, Subspace Gaussian mixture model for computer-assisted language learning, in: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, 2014, pp. 5347–5351. find
  35. A. Lee, N. F. Chen, J. Glass, Personalized mispronunciation detection and diagnosis based on unsupervised error pattern discovery, in: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, 2016, pp. 6145–6149. find
  36. N. F. Chen, H. Li, Computer-assisted pronunciation training: From pronunciation scoring towards spoken language learning, in: 2016 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA). IEEE., 2016. find
  37. K. Shi, K. M. Tan, S. U. M. Salleh, N. F. A. B. Suhaimi, R. s/o Vellu, T. N. T. H. Helen, N. F. Chen, Computer-Assisted Language Learning System: Automatic Speech Evaluation for Children Learning Malay and Tamil, in: Interspeech, 2020. find
  38. J. S. Garofolo, et al., TIMIT Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus LDC93S1, 1993. find
  39. M. Russell, The PF-STAR British English Children‘s Speech Corpus, The Speech Ark Limited (2006). find
  40. A. Batliner, M. Blomberg, S. D’Arcy, D. Elenius, D. Giuliani, M. Gerosa, C. Hacker, M. Russell, S. Steidl, M. Wong, The PF STAR Children‘s Speech Corpus, in: INTERSPEECH 2005 - Eurospeech, 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Lisbon, Portugal, September 4-8, 2005, pp. 2761–2764. find
  41. S. Weinburger, Speech Accent Archive (2015). URL: http://accent.gmu.edu. ↗
  42. N. F. Chen, R. Tong, D. Wee, P. Lee, B. Ma, H. Li, SingaKids-Mandarin: Speech Corpus of Singaporean Children Speaking Mandarin Chinese, in: INTERSPEECH, 2016, pp. 1545–1549. find
  43. N. F. Chen, R. Tong, D. Wee, P. Lee, B. Ma, H. Li, iCALL corpus: Mandarin Chinese spoken by non-native speakers of European descent, in: Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, 2015. find
  44. N. F. Chen, D. Wee, R. Tong, B. Ma, H. Li, Large-scale characterization of non-native Mandarin Chinese spoken by speakers of European origin: Analysis on iCALL, Speech Communication 84 (2016) 46 – 56. URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167639315300753. ↗
  45. P. Boersma, Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer, Glot International 5 (2001) 341–345. find
  46. N. S. Kenneth, Acoustic phonetics, MIT Press, 1998. find
  47. J. MacQueen, Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, in: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Statistics, University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1967, pp. 281–297. find
  48. A. Cutler, L. Breiman, Archetypal analysis, Technometrics 36 (1994) 338–347. doi:10.2307/1269949. ↗
  49. M. J. A. Eugster, F. Leisch, From Spider-man to Hero – Archetypal analysis in R, Journal of Statistical Software 30 (2009) 1–23. URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v030i08/v30i08.pdf. ↗
  50. M. J. A. Eugster, archetypes: Archetypal analysis (2010). URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/archetypes/archetypes.pdf. ↗
  51. S. Bartlett, G. Kondrak, C. Cherry, On the syllabification of phonemes, in: NAACL, 2009. find
  52. P.-E. Nordström, B. Lindblom, A normalization procedure for vowel formant data, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1975. find
  53. D. Jurafsky, J. H. Martin, Speech and Language Processing (3rd ed. draft), 2021. find
  54. J. C. Wells, Accents of English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. find
  55. L. Peter, J. Keith, A Course in Phonetics, Sixth Edition, Cengage Learning, Inc, 2010. find
  56. H. Sweet, The Sounds of English: An Introduction to Phonetics, Clarendon Press, 1923. find
  57. D. Jones, An Outline of English Phonetics, Cambridge: W. Heffer and Sons, 1947. find
  58. J. G. Hansen, Linguistic constraints on the acquisition of English syllable codas by native speakers of Mandarin Chinese, Applied Linguistics 22 (2001) 338–365. find
  59. Y. He, Production of English Syllable Final /l/ by Mandarin Chinese Speakers, Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5 (2014) 742–750. find
  60. D. Deterding, The Vowels of the Different Ethnic Groups in Singapore, Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2007, pp. 2–29. find
  61. J. Keith, S. V. Clayton, S. Stephanie G., Acoustic and auditory phonetics (Third edition), Chichester : Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2012. find
  62. L. Philip, Speech physiology, speech perception, and acoustic phonetics, Cambridge University Press, 1988. find
  63. B. Robert, C. Richard, L. Ceil, The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, Oxford University Press, 2015. find
  64. C.-C. Cheng, A Synchronic Phonology of Mandarin Chinese, De Gruyter Mouton, 1973. find
  65. L. Lim, U. Ansaldo, Languages in Contact, Cambridge University Press, 2015. find
  66. M. D. Duraidah, Malay + English → A Malay variety of English vowels and accent, Oxford University Press, 1980. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/gu-2022-large-scale-acoustic-characterization-singaporean/