🔗 Who cites «Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Experiments»

14 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 6 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Experiments»

1. LLM4SR: A Survey on Large Language Models for Scientific ResearcharXiv:2501.04306Ziming Luo, Zonglin Yang, Zexin Xu, et al.2025 · 39 citations
2. AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic ReviewsarXiv:2408.10365Keith Tyser, Ben Segev, Gaston Longhitano, et al.2024 · 34 citations
3. What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?arXiv:2405.06563Ilia Kuznetsov, Osama Mohammed Afzal, Koen Dercksen, et al.2024 · 33 citations
4. Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025arXiv:2504.09737Nitya Thakkar, Mert Yuksekgonul, Jake Silberg, et al.2025 · 21 citations
5. Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer RewardsarXiv:2505.04966Jaeho Kim, Yunseok Lee, Seulki Lee2025 · 13 citations
6. Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 ExperimentarXiv:2411.03417Alexander Goldberg, Ihsan Ullah, Thanh Gia Hieu Khuong, et al.2024 · 10 citations

8 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/goldberg-2023-peer-reviews-peer-reviews/cited-by/