🔗 Who cites «Can Unconfident LLM Annotations Be Used for Confident Conclusions?»

10 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 2 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Can Unconfident LLM Annotations Be Used for Confident Conclusions?»

1. The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMsAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Nitay Calderon, Roi Reichart, Rotem Dror2025 · 52 citations
2. LLM Analysis of 150+ years of German Parliamentary Debates on Migration Reveals Shift from Post-War Solidarity to Anti-Solidarity in the Last DecadearXiv:2509.07274Aida Kostikova, Ole Putz, Steffen Eger, et al.2025

8 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/gligoric-2025-can-unconfident-llm-annotations-be/cited-by/