🔗 Who cites «Reviewer2: Optimizing Review Generation Through Prompt Generation»

24 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 10 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Reviewer2: Optimizing Review Generation Through Prompt Generation»

1. LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)ReviewingConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Jiangshu Du, Yibo Wang, Wenting Zhao, et al.2024 · 71 citations
2. TreeReview: A Dynamic Tree of Questions Framework for Deep and Efficient LLM-based Scientific Peer ReviewConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Yuan Chang, Ziyue Li, Hengyuan Zhang, et al.2025 · 16 citations
3. Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM ReviewsConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Hyungyu Shin, Jingyu Tang, Yoonjoo Lee, et al.2025 · 14 citations
4. Can LLMs Identify Critical Limitations within Scientific Research? A Systematic Evaluation on AI Research PapersAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Zhijian Xu, Yilun Zhao, Manasi Patwardhan, et al.2025 · 11 citations
5. Reviewing Scientific Papers for Critical Problems With Reasoning LLMs: Baseline Approaches and Automatic EvaluationarXiv:2505.23824Tianmai M. Zhang, Neil F. Abernethy2025 · 7 citations
6. Automatic Reviewers Fail to Detect Faulty Reasoning in Research Papers: A New Counterfactual Evaluation FrameworkTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)Nils Dycke, Iryna Gurevych2026 · 5 citations
7. Paper2Rebuttal: A Multi-Agent Framework for Transparent Author Response AssistanceAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Qianli Ma, Chang Guo, Zhiheng Tian, et al.2026 · 5 citations
8. NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty AssessmentFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsWenqing Wu, Yi Zhao, Yuzhuo Wang, et al.2026 · 4 citations
9. RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback GenerationFindings of the Association for Computational LinguisticsSihong Wu, Yiling Ma, Yilun Zhao, et al.2026 · 2 citations
10. Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the FutureAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Sihong Wu, Owen Jiang, Yilun Zhao, et al.2026 · 1 citation

14 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/gao-2024-reviewer2-optimizing-review-generation-through/cited-by/