Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2025 / An Inductive-Contextual Arabic Grammar Using Historical Texts: A Case Study in a Modern Islamic Boarding School

An Inductive-Contextual Arabic Grammar Using Historical Texts: A Case Study in a Modern Islamic Boarding School

Summary

Arabic grammar (nahwu) in Indonesian pesantren is usually taught top-down. Students memorize rules from standard textbooks and can label words as verb, noun or particle, but they often fail to use that knowledge when reading real passages. This qualitative case study asks how historical narrative texts, such as Khulāṣah Nūr al-Yaqīn, can support grammar teaching that is based on discovery and context.

The authors worked at Darul Qiyam Modern Islamic Boarding School in Kerinci, Indonesia, with four grammar teachers of intermediate-to-advanced classes. They collected repeated interviews, ten observed lessons and classroom documents. The analysis rested on five pedagogical parameters: steering learners' attention toward target forms, connecting structures to their meanings, varying the kinds of output students produce, learning through interaction with peers and teachers, and support from visual aids.

Four recurring teaching strategies emerged. They range from short explicit explanation, through pattern repetition and rule inference, to group work supported by visual aids. Teachers observed sharper grammatical sensitivity, less rote learning and more learner autonomy. Some students, however, kept relying on memorized rules or struggled with complex structures.

The paper's value is a process-level account of how grammar turns into comprehension, rather than another test-score comparison. It involves no corpus, treebank or computational model.

Key points

  • Setting: one site, Darul Qiyam (Kerinci, Jambi), roughly 150–160 intermediate-to-advanced students, and four male grammar teachers with varied training, including Gontor alumni.
  • Data:
    • three semi-structured interviews per teacher, each 40–60 minutes;
    • ten classroom observations of 90 minutes each, with field notes;
    • lesson plans, worksheets and student artifacts.
  • Analytic framework: P1 directing attention to forms, P2 linking each form to its meaning, P3 varying what learners produce, P4 learning through interaction, P5 visual supports (diagrams, timelines, color coding).
  • Four strategies, each tied to parameters:
    • Direct Explanatory Scaffolding (P2);
    • Pattern Repetition (P1, P3);
    • Inductive-Contextual Exploration (P1, P2);
    • Inductive-Collaborative-Constructivist Practice (P4, P5).
  • Historical narratives were chosen because they repeat target structures inside chronological storylines. These include fiʿil māḍī/muḍāriʿ/amr, jumlah ismiyyah/fiʿliyyah, tarkīb iḍāfī and shibh al-jumlah. Negative cases, meaning learners who stayed rule-dependent, are reported openly.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. Chronological stories serve as naturally structured input, because the same constructions recur across paragraphs and learners can spot regularities by meeting them repeatedly in context. — For Mova (learn): select narrative texts that are dense in the constructions where the witness parsers disagree, so silver data concentrates on weak spots instead of being sampled at random.
  • I2. Instruction moves in stages: brief explicit explanation, then guided repetition, then independent inference, then collaborative checking. — For Mova (learn): order self-induced repair-rule learning the same way, seeding with a few hand-explained examples, then generalizing over repeated patterns, then letting several witnesses cross-check the induced rules.
  • I3. Being able to label a form (fiʿil, ism, harf) is not counted as understanding; success means linking form to meaning in discourse. — For Mova (frames): evaluate UD output by whether it yields the correct who-did-what-to-whom frame, not only by label accuracy, so that "correct tag, wrong role" errors become visible.
  • I4. The study reports learners for whom the method failed alongside its successes, which keeps the conclusions honest. — For Mova (learn): every evaluation report should include a slice of documented failures and negative controls, not just aggregate gains.
  • I5. Timelines and color coding are used to tie syntactic forms to the order of events in a story. — For Mova (world): render the event order of a text's world as a timeline linked to the verbs and tenses that justify each event, making that step explainable.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

Fields: Linguistics & languages

Cite

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.29240/jba.v9i2.14163

@inproceedings{fikri2025inductive,
  title = {{An Inductive-Contextual Arabic Grammar Using Historical Texts: A Case Study in a Modern Islamic Boarding School}},
  author = {Fikri, Ahmad and Harisah and Munir, Moh. and Fadhlan, Muhammad},
  booktitle = {Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab 9},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.29240/jba.v9i2.14163},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v9i2.14163}
}

References

29 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Aflisia, Noza, Badruzzaman M. Yunus, Izzuddin Musthafa, and Yusuf Ali Shaleh Atho. “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Nahwu Berbasis Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Untuk Meningkatkan Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Mahasiswa.” In ICON IMAD XI, edited by Ajid Thohir, M. Yusuf Wibisono, and M. Taufiq Rahman, 565–81. Bandung: UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia, 2022. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UMB_fnGQhBy8tNdU1DcfGJudxFl YdoFh/view. ↗
  2. Alzubi, Ali A., Mohd Nazim, and Jalal Ahamad. “Examining the Effect of a Collaborative Learning Intervention on EFL Students’ English Learning and Social Interaction.” Journal of Pedagogical Research 8, no. 2 (2024): 26– 46. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202425541. ↗
  3. Armijos, Hover Ismael Conza and Liliana Fernanda Celi-Celi, “Data-Driven Learning in an EFL Class: A study of Ecuadorian Learners’ Perceptions,” INNOVA Research Journal 8, no. 3 (2023): 37–50, https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v8.n3.2023.2297. ↗
  4. Aziz, Abd, and Saihu Saihu. “Interpretasi Humanistik Kebahasaan: Upaya Kontekstualisasi Kaidah Bahasa Arab.” Arabiyatuna : Jurnal Bahasa Arab 3, no. 2 (2019): 299. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v3i2.1000. ↗
  5. Azizpour, Shiva, and Parviz Alavinia. “The Impact of Focus on Form and Focus on Forms Instruction on Grammar Acquisition of the Subjunctive by Iranian Advanced EFL Learners.” Teaching English Language 15, no. 1 (2021): 215–49. https://doi.org/10.22132/TEL.2021.134368. ↗
  6. Bolderston, Amanda. “Conducting a Research Interview.” Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences 43, no. 1 (2012): 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2011.12.002. ↗
  7. Bossi, Arthur H., Cristian Mesquida, Louis Passfield, Bent R. Rønnestad, and James G. Hopker. “Optimizing Interval Training through Power-Output Variation within the Work Intervals.” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 15, no. 7 (2020): 982–89. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2019-0260. ↗
  8. Bruner, Jerome S. “The Act of Discovery.” Harvard Educational Review 31, no. 1 (1961): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088609-13. ↗
  9. Conza-Armijos, Hover Ismael, and Liliana Fernanda Celi-Celi. “Data-Driven Learning in an EFL Class: A study of Ecuadorian Learners’ Perceptions.” INNOVA Research Journal 8, no. 3 (2023): 37–50. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v8.n3.2023.2297. ↗
  10. Crossley, Scott A., Franklin Bradfield, and Analynn Bustamante. “Using Human Judgments to Examine the Validity of Automated Grammar, Syntax, and Mechanical Errors in Writing.” Journal of Writing Research 11, no. 2 (2019): 251–70. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.01. ↗
  11. Dohn, Nina Bonderup, Stig Børsen Hansen, and Søren Harnow Klausen. “On the Concept of Context.” Education Sciences 8, no. 3 (2018): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030111. ↗
  12. Fani, Tayebeh, and Farid Ghaemi. “Implications of Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) in Teacher Education: ZPTD and Self-Scaffolding.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 29, no. Iceepsy (2011): 1549–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.396. ↗
  13. Fontich, Xavier and María José García-Folgado, “Grammar Instruction in The Hispanic Area: The Case of Spain with Attention to Empirical Studies on Metalinguistic Activity,” L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature 18, no. Specialissue (2018): 1–39, https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2018.18.04.02 ↗
  14. Gonulal, Talip, and Shawn Loewen. “Scaffolding Technique.” The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, no. January (2018): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0180. ↗
  15. González-Fernández, Beatriz. “How Is Vocabulary Learnt? An Acquisitional Sequence of L2 Word Knowledge.” TESOL Quarterly 59, no. 2 (2025): 755–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3342. ↗
  16. Hashemnezhad, Hossein and Sanaz Khalili Zangalani, “Input Processing and Processing Instruction: Definitions and Issues,” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 2, no. 1 (2013): 23–27, https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.23 ↗
  17. Kenny, Neil, Alison Doyle, and Finbar Horgan. “Transformative Inclusion: Differentiating Qualitative Research Methods to Support Participation for Individuals With Complex Communication or Cognitive Profiles.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 22, no. March (2023): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221146992. ↗
  18. Lau, Wilfred W.F., and Yiu Kwong Man. “Teacher Noticing: Advancing Understanding of Teaching, Learning, Policy, and Practice in Mathematics Education.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14, no. 11 (2018): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/99810. ↗
  19. Male, Hendrikus. “Understanding Inductive and Deductive Approaches in Teaching Grammar in Efl Context.” Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan 9, no. 1 (2016): 19. https://doi.org/10.33541/jdp.v9i1.135. ↗
  20. Mason, John. “Learning about Noticing, by, and through, Noticing.” ZDM - Mathematics Education 53, no. 1 (2021): 231–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01192-4. ↗
  21. Nassaji, Hossein, and Sandra Fotos. Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms: Integrating Form-Focused Instruction in Communicative Context. Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms: Integrating Form-Focused Instruction in Communicative Context, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850961. ↗
  22. Rahmatian, Rouhollah, and Fatemeh Zarekar. “Inductive/Deductive Learning by Considering the Role of Gender—A Case Study of Iranian French-Learners.” International Education Studies 9, no. 12 (2016): 254. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n12p254. ↗
  23. Rosenshine, Barak. “Principles of Instruction: Research-Based Strategies That All Teachers Should Know.” American Educator, 2012, 12–20. find
  24. Sahinkaya, Hasan Ali. “Explicit vs. Implicit Grammar Teaching in EFL Classroom: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Academic Research in Education 9, no. 1 (2024): 14–26. https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.1369773. ↗
  25. Schmidt, Richard W. “The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning.” Applied Linguistics 11, no. 2 (1990): 129–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129. ↗
  26. Taherdoost, Hamed. “How to Conduct an Effective Interview ; A Guide to Interview Design in Research Study.” International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM) 11, no. 1 (2022): 39–51. find
  27. Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in Society: The Development OfHigher Psychological Processes. Edited by Michael Cole, Vera John-Steiner, Sylvia Scribner, and Ellen Souberman. Harvard University Press. Varvard University Press, 1978. find
  28. Yildiz, Yunus. “The Use of Scaffolding Techniques in Language Learning: Extending the Level of Understanding.” International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies 7, no. 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v7i3p148. ↗
  29. Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications. Sixth Edit., 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108. ↗

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/fikri-2025-inductive-contextual-arabic-grammar-using/