Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2022 / The treatment of moods in the Syriac linguistic tradition: command and request

The treatment of moods in the Syriac linguistic tradition: command and request

Original (French): Le traitement des modes dans la tradition linguistique syriaque : l’ordre et la requête

Paper · 2022 · Margherita Farina

Summary

Farina traces how Syriac scholars came to describe "modes", the types of utterance and the moods of the verb. The concept was hard to pin down because it drew on three traditions: Greek Aristotelian logic, Greek technical grammar (Pseudo-Dionysius Thrax, Theodosius), and a native orthoepic practice for reading Scripture correctly. The study is a close reading of the sources, with particular attention to the imperative.

In the earliest material, from the 6th–7th centuries, the logical commentaries list kinds of discourse by what the speaker is doing pragmatically. The imperative appears there as one such kind, not as a verb form. In these texts the line between grammatical mood and discourse modality is often blurred, and the classifications also touch on prosody. Later writers give the imperative a progressively more detailed morphological description and separate the imperative form more clearly from the expression of command as a discourse function.

The paper matters for the history of linguistic ideas. It shows a speech-act-like typology being transmitted and gradually split into morphology on one side and pragmatics on the other.

Key points

  • The Syriac words for "order" and "commander" come from the root *pqd: puqdānā (an abstract noun, often for divine commandment) and pāqōdā. Both terms are used metalinguistically for the imperative from the 6th century on.
  • Imperative morphology:
    • Syriac has a dedicated imperative only for the second person; third-person commands use the inaccompli (imperfect), sometimes introduced by particles.
    • Classical grammars describe the imperative as an imperfect minus its person prefixes, for example ktūb "write!" from the root ktb.
    • The imperative tends to be monosyllabic.
  • Sergius of Rešʿaynā (d. 536), in his minor commentary on the Categories, lists four species of discourse: imperative, precative, interrogative and declarative. Only the declarative is truth-evaluable, so philosophers set the other three aside.
  • Proba (6th c.), commenting on Peri Hermeneias, lists five species, adding the vocative after Ammonius. His classification rests entirely on the interaction between asker and asked:
    • asking for a word gives the interrogative;
    • asking for an action gives the vocative;
    • asking something of a superior gives the persuasive;
    • asking something of an inferior gives the imperative.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. Proba sorts utterances with a small decision tree: is the speaker asking for something, is it words or an action, and is the addressee above or below the speaker?
  • I2. In Syriac, third-person commands use a non-imperative form, so the "command" function and the "imperative" form do not coincide.
  • I3. The logicians put declaratives (truth-evaluable) on one side and all request-type utterances (not truth-evaluable) on the other.
  • I4. Each category in these sources is illustrated by a small situational scene saying who addresses whom.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (frames): crate prag could rank speech acts with explicit, inspectable features like these, including relative social status, to separate a plea from a command.
  • I2 (tokens): keep Mood=Imp in the en tagger strictly morphological, and let prag assign the command act separately so that indirect commands ("you will leave now") are not missed.
  • I3 (world): only assertions should add facts to the world of the text, while questions, pleas and orders are stored as pending requests or obligations attached to speaker and addressee.
  • I4 (learn): speech-act evaluation sets could use minimal pairs with the same wording but swapped speaker status, as negative controls checking that the model reads the relationship and not surface form.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

🔬Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueParis · France104 works · 60,877 citations🎓Université Paris CitéParis · France12 works · 1,373 citations🎓Université Sorbonne NouvelleParis · France6 works · 458 citations🔬Histoire des Théories LinguistiquesParis · France2 works · 5 citations

📚 Shelves 2The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Arts and Humanities · 9,296 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 9,206 works

🧭 Topics 3Research subjects and languages the work is about.Semitic languages · 1,484 worksHebrew & Aramaic · 481 worksAramaic · 63 works

Cite

Cite as Margherita Farina. 2022. Le traitement des modes dans la tradition linguistique syriaque : l’ordre et la requête. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 44.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.4000/hel.2223

@inproceedings{farina2022le,
  title = {{Le traitement des modes dans la tradition linguistique syriaque : l’ordre et la requête}},
  author = {Margherita Farina},
  booktitle = {Histoire Épistémologie Langage 44},
  year = {2022},
  doi = {10.4000/hel.2223},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.4000/hel.2223}
}

References

46 references, 1 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Abbeloos, Jean-Baptiste & Thomas Joseph Lamy, éd. 1872-1877. Gregorii Barhebraei Chronicon ecclesiasticum, vol. 1-3. Paris/Louvain : Maisonneuve/Peeters. find
  2. Bäthgen, Friedrich. 1880. Syrische Grammatik des Mar Elias von Tirhan. Leipzig : J.C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung. find
  3. Bohas, Georges. 2003. Les accidents du verbe dans la grammaire de Bar Zu’bî ou : une adaptation de la Technê. Langues et littératures du monde arabe 4 : 54-86. find
  4. Briquel Chatonnet, Françoise & Muriel Debié. 2017. Le monde syriaque. Paris : Belles Lettres. find
  5. Brock, Sebastian. 1979. Aspects of Translation Technique in Antiquity. Greek Roman and Byzantine Studies 20 : 69-87. find
  6. Brock, Sebastian. 1983. Towards a History of Translation Technique. find
  7. III e Symposium Syriacum, 1980. Les contacts du monde syriaque avec les autres cultures, dir. par René S. J. Lavenant, 1-14. Rome : Pontificium institutum orientalium studiorum. find
  8. Contini, Riccardo. 1998. Considerazioni interlinguistiche sull’adattamento siriaco della Techné Grammatiké di Dionisio Trace. La diffusione dell’eredità classica nell’età tardo-antica e medievale - Il Romanzo di Alessandro e altri scritti, dir. par Rosa B. Finazzi & Alfredo Valvo, 95-111. Alexandrie : Edizioni dell’Orso. find
  9. Contini, Riccardo. 2000. The Role of Linguistics in Syrian Society. History of the Language Sciences, dir. par Sylvain Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh, 341-344. Berlin/New York : Mouton de Gruyter. find
  10. Duval, Rubens. 1901. Lexicon Syriacum auctore Hassano Bar Bahlule. Paris : Leroux. find
  11. Farina, Margherita. 2013. The Accidents of the Verb in Some Medieval Syriac Grammars. Comparing Ancient Grammars. The Greek, Syriac and Arabic Traditions, dir. par Sara Eco Conti & Margherita Farina, 131-153. Pise : Edizioni della Scuola Normale Superiore. find
  12. Farina, Margherita. 2018a. La théorie linguistique de Jacques d’Édesse. Les auteurs syriaques et leur langue, dir. par Margherita Farina, 167-187. Paris : Geuthner. find
  13. Farina, Margherita. 2018b. Manuscrits de grammaires et lexiques syriaques. Les auteurs syriaques et leur langue, dir. par Margherita Farina, 243-254. Paris : Geuthner. find
  14. Farina, Margherita. 2019. Le traitement des noms composés par les grammairiens syriaques. Semitica et classica 12 : 209-223. ↗
  15. Farina, Margherita. 2021a. La tradition grammaticale syriaque comme « extension » de la grammaire grecque : les parties du discours et le participe. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 43(1) : 41-60. ↗
  16. Farina, Margherita. 2021b. Les textes linguistiques de David Bar Paulos. Le calame et le ciseau. Colophons syriaques offerts à Françoise Briquel Chatonnet, dir. par Simon Bre-laud, Jimmy Daccache, Muriel Debié, Margherita Farina, Flavia Ruani & Émilie Villey, 515-539. Paris : Geuthner. Farina, Margherita. À paraître a. Bar Zobi’s Grammar and the Texture of Knowledge in 13th Century. Christianity, Islam, and the Syriac Renaissance: The impact of ʿAbdīshōʿ bar Brīkhā. Papers Collected on His 700th Anniversary, dir. par Zeljko Paša & Salam Rassi. Rome : Pontificio Istituto Orientale. find
  17. Gottheil, Richard J.H. 1887. A Treatise on Syriac Grammar by Mâr(i) Eliâ of Sôbhâ. Berlin : Wolf Peiser. find
  18. Haddad, Butros & Yaʿqub Isaaq. 1988. Syriac and Arabic Manuscripts in the Library of the Chaldean Monastry Baghdad. Part 1: Syriac Manuscripts. Bagdad : Iraqi Academy Press. find
  19. Hoffmann, Johannes G. E. 1869. De Hermeneuticis apud Syros Aristoteleis. Leipzig : J.C. Hinrichs Bibliopola. find
  20. Hugonnard-Roche, Henri. 2004. La logique d’Aristote du grec au syriaque : études sur la transmission des textes de l’Organon et leur interprétation philosophique. Paris : Vrin. find
  21. Hugonnard-Roche, Henri. 2011. Du commentaire à la reconstruction : Paul le Perse interprète d’Aristote (sur une lecture du Peri Hermeneias, à propos des modes et des adverbes selon Paul, Ammonius et Boèce). Interpreting the Bible and Aristotle in Late Antiquity: The Alexandrian Commentary Tradition between Rome and Baghdad, dir. par Josef Lössl & John W. Watt, 207-224. Londres : Ashgate. find
  22. Hugonnard-Roche, Henri. 2018. La tradition du Peri Hermeneias d’Aristote en syriaque, entre logique et grammaire. Les auteurs syriaques et leur langue, dir. par Margherita Farina, 55-93. Paris : Geuthner. find
  23. Juckel, A. 2011. Masora. Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage, dir. par Sebastian Brock, Aaron M. Butts, George A. Kiraz & Lucas van Rompay, 276-279. Piscataway (NJ) : Gorgias Press. find
  24. King, Daniel. 2013. Grammar and Logic in Syriac (and Arabic). Journal of Semitic Studies 58 : 101-120. ↗
  25. Lallot, Jean. 1998. La grammaire de Denys le Thrace. Traduite et annotée par Jean Lallot. 2 e édition revue et augmentée. Paris : CNRS Éditions. find
  26. Martin, Jean-Pierre-Paulin. 1872. Œuvres grammaticales d’Abouʼlfaradj dit Bar Hebreus. Paris : Maisonneuve. find
  27. Martin, Jean-Pierre Paulin. 1877. Traité sur l’accentuation chez les Syriens orientaux. Paris : Imprimerie nationale. find
  28. Merx, Adalbertus. 1889. Historia artis grammaticae apud Syros. Leipzig : F.A. Brockhaus. find
  29. Moberg, Axel. 1907-1913. Buch der Strahlen: die grössere Grammatik des Barhebräus. Leipzig : Harrassowitz. find
  30. Moberg, Axel. 1909. Die syrische Grammatik des Johannes Esṭōnājā. Le monde oriental 3 : 24-33. find
  31. Moberg, Axel. 1922. Le livre des splendeurs. La grande grammaire de Grégoire Barhebraeus. Texte syriaque édité d’après les manuscrits avec une introduction et des notes par Axel Moberg. Lund : Gleerup. find
  32. Nöldeke, Theodor. 1898. Kurzgefasste Syrische Grammatik. Darmstadt : Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. find
  33. Payne Smith, Robert. 1879. Thesaurus Syriacus. Oxford : Clarendon. find
  34. Phillips, George. 1869. A Letter by Mar Jacob, Bishop of Edessa, on Syriac Orthography; also a Tract by the Same Author, and a Discourse by Gregory Bar Hebræus on Syriac Accents. Now Edited, in the Original Syriac, from Mss. in the British Museum, with an English Translation and Notes, Londres/Édimbourg : Williams and Norgate. find
  35. Revell, Ernest J. 1974. Aristotle and the Accents. The Categories of Speech in Jewish and Other Authors. Journal of Semitic Studies 19 : 19-35. find
  36. Schenkeveld, D.M. 1984. Studies in the History of Ancient Linguistics: II. Stoic and Peripatetic Kinds of Speech Act and the Distinction of Grammatical Moods. Mnemosyne 37(3/4) : 291-353. find
  37. Scher, Addai. 1906. Notice sur les manuscrits syriaques conservés dans la bibliothèque du couvent de Notre-Dame des Semences. Journal asiatique 10 e série 7 : 479-512 ; 8 : 55-82. find
  38. Scher, Addai. 1910. Theodorus bar Kōnī. Liber scholiorum. Pars prior. Paris. find
  39. E Typo-grapheo Republicae Segal, Judah B. 1953. The Diacritical Point and the Accents in Syriac. Londres : Cum-berlege. find
  40. Talmon, Rafael. 2000. Foreign Influence in the Syriac Grammatical Tradition. History of the Language Sciences, vol. I, dir. par Sylvain Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh, 337-341. Berlin/New York : Mouton de Gruyter. find
  41. Teule, Hermann G. B. 2003. Gregory Barhebraeus and his Time: The Syrian Renaissance. Journal of the Canadian Society for Syriac Studies 3 : 21-43. ↗
  42. Teule, Hermann G. B., Carmen Fotescu Tauwinkl avec Bas ter Haar Romeny & Jan van Ginkel, éd. 2010. The Syriac Renaissance. Louvain : Peeters. find
  43. Van Der Auwera, Johan & Alfonso Zamorano Aguilar. 2016. The History of Modality and Mood. The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood, dir. par Jan Nuyts & Johan Van Der Auwera, 9-29. Oxford : Oxford University Press. ↗
  44. Vosté, Jacques Marie. 1929. Catalogue de la bibliothèque syro-chaldéenne du couvent de Notre-Dame des Semences près d’Alqoš (Iraq). Rome/Paris : Bureaux de l’Angelicum/ Geuthner. find
  45. Wright, William. 1870. Catalogue of Syriac Manuscripts in the British Museum Acquired since the Year 1838 by W.\ Wright. Londres : British Museum. find
  46. Wright, William. 1871. Fragments of the Turras Mamlla Nahraya or Syriac Grammar of Jacob of Edessa. Londres : Gilbert and Rivington. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/farina-2022-le-traitement-des-modes-dans/