Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweets / cited by

Who cites «TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweets»

50 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 15 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweets»

  1. How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and DetectionarXiv:2301.07597Biyang Guo, Xin Zhang, Ziyuan Wang, et al.2023 · 555 citations
  2. Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?arXiv:2303.11156Vinu Sankar Sadasivan, Aounon Kumar, Sriram Balasubramanian, et al.2023 · 306 citations
  3. Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability CurvaturearXiv:2310.05130Guangsheng Bao, Yanbin Zhao, Zhiyang Teng, et al.2023 · 148 citations
  4. Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer ReviewsarXiv:2403.07183Weixin Liang, Zachary Izzo, Yaohui Zhang, et al.2024 · 119 citations
  5. GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writersarXiv:2304.02819Weixin Liang, Mert Yuksekgonul, Yining Mao, et al.2023 · 110 citations
  6. Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific PapersarXiv:2404.01268Weixin Liang, Yaohui Zhang, Zhengxuan Wu, et al.2024 · 89 citations

35 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/fagni-2020-tweepfake-about-detecting-deepfake-tweets/cited-by/