🔗 Who cites «Replicability Analysis for Natural Language Processing: Testing Significance with Multiple Datasets»

35 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 4 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Replicability Analysis for Natural Language Processing: Testing Significance with Multiple Datasets»

1. Results of WMT23 Metrics Shared Task: Metrics Might Be Guilty but References Are Not InnocentConference on Machine Translation (WMT)Markus Freitag, Nitika Mathur, Chi-kiu Lo, et al.2023 · 155 citations
2. A Statistical Analysis of Summarization Evaluation Metrics Using Resampling MethodsTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL)Daniel Deutsch, Rotem Dror, Dan Roth2021 · 117 citations
3. The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMsAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Nitay Calderon, Roi Reichart, Rotem Dror2025 · 52 citations
4. Reproducibility in Machine Learning-Driven ResearcharXiv:2307.10320Harald Semmelrock, Simone Kopeinik, Dieter Theiler, et al.2023 · 11 citations

31 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/dror-2017-replicability-analysis-natural-language-processing/cited-by/