Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / Parsing to Stanford Dependencies: Trade-offs… / cited by

Who cites «Parsing to Stanford Dependencies: Trade-offs between Speed and Accuracy»

30 papers of our library cite it (of the 140,884 whose bibliographies we read) · 6 with a page here, the most cited first · ← the paper

  1. Parser Showdown at the Wall Street Corral: An Empirical Investigation of Error Types in Parser OutputJonathan K. Kummerfeld, David Hall, James R. Curran, et al.2012 · 127 citations
  2. Parser Evaluation over Local and Non-Local Deep Dependencies in a Large CorpusEmily M. Bender, Dan Flickinger, Stephan Oepen, et al.2011 · 53 citations
  3. Evaluating Dependency Parsing: Robust and Heuristics-Free Cross-Annotation EvaluationReut Tsarfaty, Joakim Nivre, Evelina Andersson2011 · 46 citations
  4. An Empirical Comparison of Parsing Methods for Stanford DependenciesLingpeng Kong, Noah A. Smith2014 · 39 citations
  5. Identifying Cascading Errors using Constraints in Dependency ParsingDominick Ng, James R. Curran2015 · 12 citations
  6. Parsing Any Domain English text to CoNLL dependenciesSudheer Kolachina, Prasanth Kolachina2012 · 6 citations

24 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/cer-2010-parsing-stanford-dependencies-trade-offs/cited-by/