Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / The Alternative Annotator Test for… / cited by

Who cites «The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMs»

29 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 7 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMs»

  1. BenGER: Benchmarking LLM Systems on Subsumption-Based Legal Reasoning in German LawarXiv:2605.28183Sebastian Nagl, Ann-Kristin Mayrhofer, Martin Heidebach, et al.2026
  2. Don't ‘Well, Actually' Me Unless You Know What You're Talking About: Weak Presupposition Verification Degrades General QA PerformancearXiv:2608.06539Shenran Wang, Vered Shwartz, Hila Gonen2026

22 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/calderon-2025-alternative-annotator-test-llm-as/cited-by/