Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2021 / Truso in the Old English Orosius and Tczew, Poland

Truso in the Old English Orosius and Tczew, Poland

Paper · 2021 · Andrew Breeze

Summary

This paper revisits a long-standing puzzle in the Old English Orosius: where was Truso, the Baltic trading place that the mariner Wulfstan reached around 891? Since Henry Sweet in 1883, most Anglo-Saxonists, and many Polish scholars, have placed it at Lake Drużno (Drausensee) near Elbląg. Breeze traces that consensus through more than a century of dictionaries, editions, translations and histories. He shows that it rests on repetition of Sweet's guess rather than on new evidence. He then defends a largely overlooked 1985 proposal by Stanisław Rospond, who identified Truso with Tczew (German Dirschau) on the Vistula's main channel. The argument rests on medieval spellings of the two place names. Tczew's early forms fit Truso closely, while the lake's recorded name has the wrong initial letter and an extra internal consonant. The town's site and long history as a trading centre support the case. The paper urges archaeologists and historians of early English, Viking and Polish contacts to rethink their mapping.

Key points

  • Wulfstan's account is an interpolation in the Old English Orosius. Richard Hakluyt already printed a translation of it in 1598.
  • Tczew is attested as Trsow (1193), Trssew (1263) and Treseu (1277). Rospond tied the name to early Polish treść, meaning 'reed', which suits a site above marshland.
  • Lake Drużno appears as Drusin in the early 13th century. Its initial <d> and its <n> are incompatible with Truso.
  • The identification with Drużno or Elbląg goes back to Henry Sweet. Bosworth, Whitelock, Bately, Godden and others repeated it, often with stated uncertainty.
  • A referee pointed the author to two recent books:
    • Kleingärtner 2014 covers Tczew's early medieval archaeology.
    • Gardela 2015 still credits Marek Jagodziński's 1982 excavations near Lake Drużno as finding Truso, which shows Rospond remains ignored.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. A candidate identification can be rejected when its attested spellings conflict on specific features, such as the first letter or an internal consonant, instead of relying on vague similarity.
  • I2. Wide scholarly agreement here came from many authors copying one early source, so the agreement added no independent evidence.
  • I3. The author catches a source that puts Königsberg at the wrong end of the lagoon by comparing the claim against the map.
  • I4. The Vistula delta of the 9th century differed greatly from today's, so old descriptions must be read against period maps.
  • I5. The debate partly hinges on what "the lake" refers to (inland lake or coastal lagoon) and on which river is the subject of a clause.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (world): When linking place names to Wikidata entities, Mova could score candidates on explicit orthographic constraints and record which feature ruled each one out, keeping the link decision explainable.
  • I2 (learn): Before accepting silver data agreed by several witness parsers, check whether the witnesses share a training source or rules, and discount agreement that is not independent.
  • I3 (world): Spatial claims extracted from a text could be checked against the knowledge graph, with contradictions flagged rather than silently stored.
  • I4 (world): Store geographic and other facts with time validity, so the world of a historical text is built from period-appropriate states rather than present-day ones.
  • I5 (frames): Coreference and role assignment could keep competing antecedents as explicit alternatives with their evidence, rather than committing early to one reading.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

🎓Universidad de NavarraPamplona · Spain3 works

 Fields, topics and concepts

📚 Shelves 4The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Arts and Humanities · 16,039 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 15,891 worksHistory · 85 worksClassics · 116 works

🧭 Topics 2Research subjects and languages the work is about.English · 2,263 worksHistorical linguistics & language change · 249 works

Cite

Cite as Andrew Breeze. 2021. Truso in the Old English Orosius and Tczew, Poland. SELIM 26.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.17811/selim.26.2021.129-136

@inproceedings{breeze2021truso,
  title = {{Truso in the Old English Orosius and Tczew, Poland}},
  author = {Andrew Breeze},
  booktitle = {SELIM 26},
  year = {2021},
  doi = {10.17811/selim.26.2021.129-136},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.17811/selim.26.2021.129-136}
}

References

32 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Bately, J. ed. 1980: The Old English Orosius. Oxford, Oxford University Press. find
  2. Bately, J. 1991: The Nature of Old English Prose. In M. Godden & M. Lapidge eds. The Cambridge Companion to Old English Literature. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 71–87. find
  3. Bosworth, J. 1898: An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford, Oxford University Press. find
  4. Chambers, R. W. 1912: Widsith: A Study in Old English Heroic Legend. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. find
  5. Gardela, L. 2015: Vikings in Poland: A Critical Overview. In M. H. Ericksen, U. Pedersen, B. Rundberget, I. Axelsen & H. Berg eds. Viking Worlds. Oxford, Oxbow Books: 213–234. find
  6. Gieysztor, A. 1979: Medieval Poland. In S. Kieniewicz ed. History of Poland. 2nd ed. Warszawa, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe: 23–141. find
  7. Fisiak, J. 1962: Emendacje polskiego przekładu tekstów staroangielskich. Rozprawy Komisji Językowej ŁTN 8: 78–89. find
  8. Godden, M. ed. 2016: The Old English History of the World. Cambridge & Massachusetts, Harvard University Press. find
  9. Hiatt, A. 2010: Maps and Margins. In E. Treharne & G. Walker eds. The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Literature in English. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 649– 676. find
  10. Jones, G. 1968: A History of the Vikings. London, Oxford University Press. find
  11. Keynes, S. & M. Lapidge 1983: Alfred the Great. Harmondsworth, Penguin. find
  12. Kirby, D. P. 1967: The Making of Early England. London, Batsford. find
  13. Kleingärtner, S. 2014: Die frühe Phase der Urbanisierung an der südlichen Ostseeküste im ersten nachchristlichen Jahrtausend. Neumünster, Wachholtz Verlaf. find
  14. Labuda, G. 1961: Źródła, sagi i legendy do najdawniejszych dziejów Polski. Warszawa, Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. find
  15. Labuda, G. 1980: Diplomacja Polska wczesnego feudalizmu (wiek X – 1306r.). In M. Biskup ed. Historia diplomacji Polskiej. Warszawa, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe: 33–217. find
  16. Loyn, H. R. 1962: Anglo-Saxon England and the Norman Conquest. London, Longman. find
  17. Magennis, H. 2011: The Cambridge Introduction to Anglo-Saxon Literature. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. find
  18. Ostrowski, W. 1976: Literatura staropolska a literatura angielska. In T. Michalłowska & J. Śląski eds. Literatura staropolska w kontekscie europejskim. Wrocław, Zakład Narodowy imięnia Ossolińskich: 209–231. find
  19. Roesdahl, E. 1991: The Vikings. London, Allen Lane. find
  20. Rospond, S. 1984: Słownik etymologiczny miast i gmin PRL. Wrocław, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. find
  21. Truso and Tczew Andrew Breeze Samsonowicz, H. 1990: Historia Polski do roku 1795. 5th ed. Warszawa, Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne. find
  22. Sheppard, A. 1999: Orosius. In M. Lapidge, J. Blair, S. Keynes & D. Scragg eds. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Oxford, Blackwell: 346–347. find
  23. Stanley, E. G. 1996: How the Elbing Deprives the Vistula of its Name: An Unnoticed Reference. Notes and Queries 241: 258–259. ↗
  24. Stanton, R. 2008: King Alfred. In R. Ellis ed. The Oxford History of Literary Translation in English: to 1500. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 116–125. find
  25. Stenton, F. M. 1971: Anglo-Saxon England. 3rd ed. Oxford, Clarendon Press. find
  26. Smyth, A. P. 1995: King Alfred the Great. Oxford, Oxford University Press. ↗
  27. Swanton, M. J. trans. 1975: Anglo-Saxon Prose. London, Dent. find
  28. Whitelock, D. ed. 1967: Sweet’s Anglo-Saxon Reader. 15th ed. Oxford, Clarendon Press. find
  29. Whitelock, D. 1974: The Beginnings of English Society. Rev. ed. Harmondsworth, Penguin. find
  30. Wyatt, A. J. ed. 1919: An Anglo-Saxon Reader. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. find
  31. Zbierski, A. & J. Kazimierz. 1980: Gdańsk w okresie panowania królow polskich i ksiązat pomorskich (od IX w. do XIII w.). In E. Cieslak ed. Historia Gdańska: Tom I do roku 1454. Gdańsk, Wydawnictwo Morksie: 69–336. find
  32. Zins, H. 1974: Polska w oczach Anglików. Warszawa, Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy. Author’s address Departamento de Filología Universidad de Navarra Pamplona 31009 (Spain) e-mail: abreeze@unav.es received: 16 March 2021 revised version accepted: 12 April 2021 find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/breeze-2021-truso-old-english-orosius-tczew/