Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2018 / Terms of Address in Hong Kong Variety of the English Language (Based on Analysis of “A Dictionary of Hong Kong English”)

Terms of Address in Hong Kong Variety of the English Language (Based on Analysis of “A Dictionary of Hong Kong English”)

Paper · 2018 · Yuliya V Bekisheva and Svetlana S Il’ina

Summary

The paper describes how speakers of Hong Kong English address one another, and treats these forms as a window into local culture within the World Englishes framework. The authors had earlier surveyed Hong Kong residents and sorted address forms into six groups: kin, strangers, friends and acquaintances, professional status, animals, and special or unique forms. Here they take a second source, “A Dictionary of Hong Kong English” (Cummings & Wolf, 2011). They collect the direct and indirect address forms recorded in it and analyse them with observational, descriptive and quantitative methods.

Before the analysis, the paper reviews:

  • Kachru’s ideas of nativization and pluricentric English;
  • the historical layers of English in Hong Kong;
  • its typical sound, grammar and vocabulary traits.

Working from the dictionary, the authors expand the scheme to seven groups. The new ones cover address that marks the addressee’s nationality, insulting address, and traditional Hong Kong forms. They conclude that address in Hong Kong English, heavily shaped by Cantonese, reflects the cultural identity of its speakers.

Key points

  • Two data sources: an earlier questionnaire survey of Hong Kong residents (6 groups) and “A Dictionary of Hong Kong English” (Hong Kong University Press, 2011), which yields 7 groups.
  • New categories from the dictionary: nationality-marking address, insulting (invective) address, and traditional Hong Kong address forms.
  • Historical layers: the paper sees modern Hong Kong English as the third stage, after a trade pidgin and a colonial English influenced by Indian workers and soldiers.
  • Grammar traits:
    • missing 3rd-person -s;
    • inconsistent plural -s;
    • unmarked past tense;
    • double comparatives such as more better;
    • sentences with no subject or with a repeated subject.
  • Vocabulary traits:
    • Cantonese loans grouped by theme (dim-sum, taipan, mahjong);
    • hybrid compounds such as Ching Ming Festival;
    • local derivations such as Hongkonger and Mainlander.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. The authors build a category from a survey and then re-check it against a dictionary, and the second source adds classes the first one missed; triangulating sources this way exposes gaps in any single-source taxonomy.
  • I2. Kachru’s split between error, deviation and innovation treats a deviation as a variety feature once a whole community uses it systematically, rather than as a mistake.
  • I3. Hong Kong English allows both dropped subjects and doubled subjects, where a noun phrase is later resumed by a pronoun such as they.
  • I4. The paper treats address terms as signals of the speaker’s attitude, the addressee’s status and the relation between them, not merely as attention-getters.
  • I5. Hybrid loans pair a Cantonese part with an English head noun that fixes the category, as in Ching Ming Festival.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (learn): build lexical inventories (e.g. vocatives) from several independent sources and log which classes each source alone would have missed, as a coverage check.
  • I2 (tokens): the tagger and lemmatizer should accept forms like unmarked plurals or a bare 3rd-person verb as possible variety features, keeping the intended feature instead of forcing a repair.
  • I3 (tree): add such sentences to parser tests so that missing subjects are handled gracefully and resumed subjects are attached in a principled UD way rather than as two nsubj.
  • I4 (frames): when a vocative appears, record the social relation it implies (kin, professional, insult) as an explainable pragmatic fact that can feed into the world of the text.
  • I5 (world): classify unknown multiword names by their English head (festival → event) so that unfamiliar cultural terms still receive an ontology type.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

🎓Far Eastern Federal UniversityVladivostok · Russia2 works · 6 citations

📚 Shelves 2The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Arts and Humanities · 9,296 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 9,206 works

🧭 Topics 1Research subjects and languages the work is about.English · 1,373 works

Cite

Cite as Yuliya V Bekisheva and Svetlana S Il’ina. 2018. Terms of Address in Hong Kong Variety of the English Language (Based on Analysis of “A Dictionary of Hong Kong English”). Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices 15.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.22363/2618-897x-2018-15-4-501-517

@inproceedings{bekisheva2018terms,
  title = {{Terms of Address in Hong Kong Variety of the English Language (Based on Analysis of “A Dictionary of Hong Kong English”)}},
  author = {Yuliya V Bekisheva and Svetlana S Il’ina},
  booktitle = {Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices 15},
  year = {2018},
  doi = {10.22363/2618-897x-2018-15-4-501-517},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-897x-2018-15-4-501-517}
}

References

30 references, 1 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Kabakchi, V.V. 1993. Angliiskii yazyk mezhkul’turnogo obshcheniya [The English Language of Cross-cultural Communication].Saint Petersburg: Obrazovanie. Print. (In Russ). find
  2. Proshina, Z.G. 2004. Perekrestok: Anglo-russkii kontaktologicheskii slovar’ vostochnoaziatskoi kul’tury [Cross-road: English — Russian Contactology Dictionary of East Asian Culture]. Vladivostok: Dal’nevostochniyi universitet. Print. (In Russ). find
  3. Kachru, B. 1998. English as an Asian Language. Links & Letters 5. Print. find
  4. Platt, J.T., H. Weber, and Ho L.M. 1984. The New Englishes. London, Melbourne & Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Print. find
  5. Kachru, B. 1986. The Alchemy of English: The Spread, Functions and Models of Non-Native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Print. find
  6. Proshina, Z.G. 2001. Angliiskii yazyk I kul’tura narodov Vostochnoi Azii [The English Language and Culture of East Asia Nations]. Vladivostok: Dal’nevostochniyi universitet. Print. (In Russ). find
  7. Kachru, B. 1986. The Power and Politics of English. World Englishes 5 (2/3). Print. ↗
  8. Kachru, B. 1992. Teaching World Englishes. In B. Kachru (ed.) The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures (2nd ed.) Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press. Print. find
  9. Pandharipande, R.V. 1987. On Nativization of English. World Englishes 6 (2). Print. ↗
  10. Berns, M. 2005. Expanding on the Expanding Circle: Where Do WE Go from There? World Englishes 24 (1). Print. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0883-2919.2005.00389.x ↗
  11. Evans, S. 2011. Hong Kong English and the Professional World. World Englishes 30 (3). Print. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.2011.01655.x ↗
  12. Bolton, K. 2000. The Sociolinguistics of Hong Kong and the Space for Hong Kong English. World Englishes 19 (3). Print.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971x.00179 ↗
  13. Chan, Jim Y.H. 2013. Contextual Variation and Hong Kong English. World Englishes. Vol. 32 (1). Print.https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12004 ↗
  14. Setter, J., C. Wong, and Chan B. 2010. Hong Kong English. Edinburgh University Press. Print. ↗
  15. Cummings, P.J., and H-G. Wolf. 2011. A Dictionary of Hong Kong English. Words from the Fragrant Harbor. Hong Kong University Press. Print. find
  16. Kabakchi, V.V., and Z.G. Proshina. 2012. “V chuzhoi monastyr’ so svoim lingvokul’turnym ustavom: obrashchenie” [Into Foreign Monastery with own Cultural Typicon: Terms of Address]. Lichnost’, Kul’tura. Obshchestvo 14 (1): 69—70. Print. (In Russ.) find
  17. Kurilova, K.A. 1999. Obrashcheniya v sovremennom kitaiskom yazyke (k voprosu o rechevom etikete kitaitsev) [Terms of Address in Modern Chinese (revisiting the Chinese Speaking Etiquette)]. Vladivostok: Dal’nevostochniyi universitet. Print. (In Russ). Бекишева Ю.В., Ильина С.С. Полилингвиальность и транскультурные практики. 2018. Т. 15. № 4. С. 501—517 find
  18. Il’ina, S.S. 2007. Obrashcheniya v singapurskom variante angliiskogo yazyka [Terms of Address in Singapore Variant of the English Language]. Vladivostok: Dal’nevostochniyi universitet. Print. (In Russ). find
  19. Brown, R., and M. Ford. 1972. Address in American English. In Laver, J., S. Hutchetson. Communication in Face-to-Face Interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Print. find
  20. Jia, Y. 1999. Interpersonal Relationship and Intercultural Communication: East and West. Aspects of Intercultural Communication. Proceedings of China’s 2 nd Conference on International Communication. Print. find
  21. Rozental’, D.E., and M.A. Telenkova. 1985. Slovar’-spravochnik lingvisticheskikh terminov [Dictionary — Book of Reference of Linguistic Terms]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie. Print. (In Russ). find
  22. Tarasov, E.F., and Yu.A. Sorokin. 1977. Natsional’no-kul’turnaya spetsifika rechevogo I nerechevogo povedeniya [National-cultural Specific of Verbal and Non-verbal Behavior]. Moscow: Nauka. Print. (In Russ). find
  23. Lendel, Zh. 1977. “Obrashcheniya, privetstviya I proshchaniya v rechevom etikete sovremennykh vengrov” [Terms of Address, Greetings and Good-byes in Speaking Etiquette of Modern Hungarians] in Natsional’no-kul’turnaya spetsifika rechevogo povedeniya. Moscow: Nauka. Print. (In Russ). find
  24. Skorbatyuk, I.D. 1977. “Nekotorye aspekty vyrazheniya form vezhlivosti v koreiskom yazyke” [Some Aspects of Expression Forms of Politeness in the Korean Language] in Natsional’no-kul’turnaya spetsifika rechevogo povedeniya. Moscow: Nauka. Print. (In Russ). find
  25. Gann, G. 1994. “Terminologiya rodstva v lingvisticheskom I natsional’no-kul’turnom aspektakh: (na material sovremennogo kitaiskogo yazyka i sovremennogo russkogo yazyka)” [Terminology of Relationship in Linguistic and National-cultural Aspects (Based on Materials of Modern Chinese and Russian languages). PhD Thesis. Moscow. Print. (In Russ). find
  26. Sternin I.A., T.V. Larina, and Sternina M.A. 2003. Ocherk angliiskogo kommunikativnogo povedeniya [Study of English Communication Behavior]. Voronezh: Istoki. Print. (In Russ). find
  27. Maiol, E., and D. Milsted. 1999. Eti strannye anglichane [These Strange Englishmen]. Moscow, Egmont Rossiya Ltd. Print. (In Russ). find
  28. Mitali, S. 2001. “Obrashchenie kak element russkogo rechevogo etiketa v sravnenii s bengal’skim” [Terms of Address as a Part of Russian Speaking Etiquette in Comparison with Bengali]. PhD Thesis. Moscow. Print. (In Russ). find
  29. Tarasov, E.F. 1996. Mezhkul’turnoe obshchenie — novaya ontologiya analiza yazykovogo soznaniya [Intercultural Communication — New Ontology of Linguistic Consciousness Analysis]. Moscow: IYaRAN. Print. (In Russ). find
  30. Bekisheva, Y.V., and S.S. Il’ina. 2017. “Obrashcheniya v gonkongskom variante angliiskogo yazyka (na material provedennykh oprosov zhitelei Gonkonga)” [Terms of Address in Hong Kong Variant of the English Language (based on the interviewing of Hong Kong citizens] in Problemy, perspektivy I napravleniya innovatsionnogo razvitiya nauki Proceedings. 08 July, Perm’. Ufa: Omega-Sains Publ. Print. (In Russ). Article history: Received: 26.04.2018 Accepted: 26.09.2018 Moderator: U.M. Bakhtikireeva Conflict of interests: none For citation: Bekisheva, Y.V., and S.S. Il’ina. 2018. “Terms of Address in Hong Kong Variety of the English Language (Based on Analysis of “A Dictionary of Hong Kong English”)”. Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices, 15 (4), 501—517. DOI 10.22363/2618-897X-2018-15-4-501-517 Bekisheva Y.V., Il’ina S.S. Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices, 2018, 15 (4), 501—517 Bio Notes: Yuliya V. Bekisheva is an Assistant of the Academic Department of English at the Eastern Institute — School of Regional and International Studies. E-mail: julia.bekisheva@gmail.com Svetlana S. Il’ina is a PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the Academic Department of English at the Eastern Institute — School of Regional and International Studies. E-mail: svilyina@ mail.ru ↗

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/bekisheva-2018-terms-address-hong-kong-variety/