🔗 Who cites «Evaluating Sakana's AI Scientist: Bold Claims, Mixed Results, and a Promising Future?»

11 papers of our library cite it (of the 149,439 whose bibliographies we read) · 5 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Evaluating Sakana's AI Scientist: Bold Claims, Mixed Results, and a Promising Future?»

1. The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree SearcharXiv:2504.08066Yutaro Yamada, Robert Tjarko Lange, Cong Lu, et al.2025 · 129 citations
2. AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific ResearchScience China Information SciencesQiguang Chen, Mingda Yang, Libo Qin, et al.2025 · 21 citations
3. SciIntegrity-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Academic Integrity in AI Scientist SystemsarXiv:2605.10246Zonglin Yang, Xingtong Liu, Xinyan Xu2026 · 4 citations
4. Is This Idea Novel? An Automated Benchmark for Judgment of Research IdeasLanguage Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC)Tim Schopf, Michael Färber2026 · 1 citation
5. Position: Correct Answer, Wrong Mechanism — When AI Scientists Defend General Claims Their Own Data ContradictsarXiv:2606.23175Steven Young Eulig2026 · 1 citation

6 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/beel-2025-evaluating-sakana-s-ai/cited-by/