🔗 Who cites «The elephant in the interpretability room: Why use attention as explanation when we have saliency methods?»

69 papers of our library cite it (of the 141,840 whose bibliographies we read) · 4 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «The elephant in the interpretability room: Why use attention as explanation when we have saliency methods?»

Looking for a Needle in a Haystack: A Comprehensive Study of Hallucinations in Neural Machine TranslationConference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL)Nuno M. Guerreiro, Elena Voita, André Martins2023 · 147 citations
Does Commonsense help in detecting Sarcasm?Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLPSomnath Basu Roy Chowdhury, Snigdha Chaturvedi2021 · 17 citations
ZIP: Quantifying Which Words Matter in Zero-Shot Instructional PromptsJoint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM)Nikta Gohari Sadr, Sangmitra Madhusudan, Arash Asgari, et al.2026
Review and Performance Comparison of Deep Knowledge Tracing Models (深度知识追踪模型综述和性能比较)Journal of SoftwareYu Wang (王宇), Mengxia Zhu (朱梦霞), Shanghui Yang (杨尚辉), et al.2022

65 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/bastings-2020-elephant-interpretability-room-why-use/cited-by/