Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2025 / Exploring the Interaction of Personality, Strategy, and Learning Environment in Achieving Success in Learning Arabic Grammar

Exploring the Interaction of Personality, Strategy, and Learning Environment in Achieving Success in Learning Arabic Grammar

Summary

This qualitative study in Arabic language education asks how personality, learning strategies and learning environment combine to make some students unusually good at Arabic grammar. Few earlier studies looked at how these three factors interact. The authors used narrative inquiry with two purposively chosen Indonesian pesantren students, who took first and second place in a 2024 provincial kitab-reading competition. Each gave an in-depth interview. The researchers coded the transcripts with Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis and interpreted them through three theories: Tabrani's personality theory, Zimmerman's self-regulated learning and Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory.

The two students reached similar success by different routes:

  • Ersya is disciplined and learns socially, inside a structured mu'adalah grammar programme.
  • Ali learns mostly on his own, in a school where teachers act as facilitators.

The authors conclude that no single learning pattern is best. What matters is how well a student's strategy and environment fit their personality. The paper has no computational content. Its value for NLP readers lies in its study design and methodology.

Key points

  • The sample has two participants: Ersya Fikri Raihan Syahputra (19) and Ali Tamam (18). Both won provincial Arabic grammar or kitab-reading competitions in 2024.
  • Inclusion criteria were a top-three competition result, willingness to be interviewed, and the ability to narrate one's experience reflectively.
  • Interviews took place on Zoom in Indonesian on 30 June and 1 July 2024. They were analysed with Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis, and credibility was checked by member checking (participants verified their transcripts).
  • Ersya resolves difficulties in a fixed order: peers first, then seniors, then the teacher. His school runs a mu'adalah class dedicated to grammar.
  • Ali's school emphasises self-directed learning with teacher scaffolding. The authors link this to Knowles and Vygotsky, and they name the small sample as the study's main limitation.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. Ersya's help-seeking runs in a fixed cost order (peers, then seniors, then teacher), so expensive help is used only when cheap help fails. — For Mova (learn): Mova could consult the agreeing witness parsers first and escalate to higher LLM teacher tiers only on sentences where they disagree, keeping teacher calls rare and targeted.
  • I2. Member checking sends the researchers' transcript back to the source person for confirmation before interpretation proceeds. — For Mova (back): Mova could regenerate text from the meaning graph and compare it with the original sentence, treating a failed round trip as a flag that the graph misread the text.
  • I3. Each theme in the results table pairs a verbatim quote with a separate interpretation, so every claim can be traced to its evidence. — For Mova (frames): Mova could store each inferred frame or speech act together with the exact token span that licensed it, making pragmatic conclusions auditable.
  • I4. In scaffolding, the learner works alone and receives support only at the point of difficulty, which reveals exactly where competence ends. — For Mova (answer): Mova's student readers could attempt tests unaided and request hints only on failure, with every hint point logged as a map of missing knowledge.
  • I5. The finding that structured and self-directed routes both succeed when they suit the learner argues against one uniform training regime. — For Mova (learn): Mova could choose curriculum-style supervised training or self-play separately for each component, based on which one measurably fits that component.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

Fields: Linguistics & languages

Cite

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.22219/jiz.v8i2.38146

@inproceedings{bahy2025exploring,
  title = {{Exploring the Interaction of Personality, Strategy, and Learning Environment in Achieving Success in Learning Arabic Grammar}},
  author = {Bahy, Moh. Buny Andaru and Ulum, Mohammad Samsul and Zuhdy, Halimi and Rahman, Aulia and Taufiq, Mirwan Akhmad and Naf'an, Abdul Wahab},
  booktitle = {Izdihar 8},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.22219/jiz.v8i2.38146},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v8i2.38146}
}

References

67 references, 1 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H. (2020). Translanguagism and the bilingual EFL learner of Saudi Arabia: Exploring new vistas. Asian EFL Journal , 27 (1), 14–26. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3570623 ↗
  2. Almusharraf, A., & Almusharraf, N. (2021). Socio-interactive practices and personality within an EFL online learning environments. Education and Information Technologies , 26 (4), 3947–3966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10449-8 ↗
  3. Anthonysamy, L., Koo, A. C., & Hew, S. H. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies and non-academic outcomes in higher education blended learning environments: A one decade review. Education and Information Technologies , 25 (5), 3677–3704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10134-2 ↗
  4. Ardiansyah, A. A., & Muhammad, A. (2020). Implementation of Integrative Arabic Grammar (Nahwu & Sharaf) Curriculum in Islamic Boarding School. Izdihar : Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature , 3 (3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v3i3.13264 ↗ our card
  5. Assalahi, H. M. (2013). Why Is the Grammar-translation Method Still Alive in the Arab World? Teachers’ Beliefs and Its implications for EFL Teacher Education. Theory & Practice in Language Studies (TPLS) , 3 (4). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.4.589-599 Bahy, M. B. A., Ainin, M., Rosyidi, A. W., Rahman, A., Syaifullah, M., & Naf’an, A. W. ↗
  6. Please cite this article as Bahy, M.B.A., Ulum, M.S., Zuhdy, H., Rahman A., Taufiq, M.A., Naf’an, A.W. (2025). Exploring the Interplay of Personality, Learning Strategies, and Learning Environment in Mastering Arabic Grammar. Izdihar : Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 8(2), 163-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v8i2.38146 ↗
  7. (2024). Digitalization of Arabic Language Textbook Based on Communicative Learning to Improve the Linguistic Competence of Madrasah Tsanawiyah Students. An Nabighoh , 26 (1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.32332/annabighoh.v26i1.67-78 ↗
  8. Bahy, M. B. A., & Taufiq, M. A. (2022). Analisis Buku Ajar Bahasa Arab Tingkat Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Perspektif Amani dan Awatif. Taqdir , 7 (2), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.19109/taqdir.v7i2.10175 ↗
  9. Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Hatcher, R. (2021). Finding satisfaction: intrinsic motivation for synchronous and asynchronous communication in the online language learning context. Education and Information Technologies , 26 (3), 2563– 2583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10369-z ↗
  10. Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2013). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research . Routledge. find
  11. Billett, S. (2020). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice . Routledge. find
  12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide . SAGE publications Ltd. find
  13. Brosh, H. Y. (2019). Arabic language-learning strategy preferences among undergraduate students. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching , 9 (2), 351–377. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.2.5 ↗
  14. Cai, Z., Mao, P., Wang, D., He, J., Chen, X., & Fan, X. (2022). Effects of Scaffolding in Digital Game-Based Learning on Student’s Achievement: a Three-Level Meta-analysis. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 34, Nomor 2). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09655-0 ↗
  15. Cayubit, R. F. O. (2022). Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students. Learning Environments Research , 25 (2), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x ↗
  16. Clandinin, D. J. (2022). Engaging in narrative inquiry . Routledge. find
  17. Clandinin, D. J., Huber, J., Menon, J., Murphy, M. S., & Swanson, C. (2016). Narrative inquiry: Conducting research in early childhood. The SAGE handbook of early childhood research , 240–254. find
  18. Cresswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches . Sage publications. find
  19. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches . Sage publications. find
  20. Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. J. (2018). A system’s view of e‐learning success model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education , 16 (1), 42–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12144 ↗
  21. Gambo, Y., & Shakir, M. Z. (2021). Review on self-regulated learning in smart learning p-ISSN : 2622-738X e-ISSN : 2622-7371 environment. Smart Learning Environments , 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00157-8 ↗
  22. Ginzburg, S. B., Santen, S. A., & Schwartzstein, R. M. (2021). Self-directed Learning: a New Look at an Old Concept. Medical Science Educator , 31 (1), 229–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01121-w ↗
  23. Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning (Vol. 67). Multilingual Matters. find
  24. Hafidah, H., Isnaini, R. L., & Kholis, M. N. (2024). Investigating Active Learning Model For Arabic Grammar Lectures. Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning , 7 (2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v7i2.25175 ↗
  25. Hristov, S., Nakov, D., & Miočinović, J. (2023). Constructive Alignment Between Objectives, Teaching and Learning Activities, Student Competencies and Assessment Methods in Higher Education. Journal of Agriculture and Plant Sciences , 21 (2), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.46763/japs23212021h ↗
  26. Khairul Amali, N. A., Mohd Ridzuan, M. U., Rahmat, N. H., Seng, H. Z., & Mustafa, N. C. (2023). Exploring Learning Environment Through Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development , 12 (2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v12-i2/16516 ↗
  27. Kolb, D. A., & Kolb, A. Y. (2013). Research on Validity and Educational Applications. Experience Based Learning Systems , 5 , 0–233. find
  28. Kormos, J. (2023). The role of cognitive factors in second language writing and writing to learn a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 45 (3), 622– 646. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000481 ↗
  29. Kukulska-hulme, A. (2025). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0768 ↗
  30. Mahmoodi, M. H., & Yousefi, M. (2022). Second language motivation research 2010– 2019: A synthetic exploration. The Language Learning Journal , 50 (3), 273–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1869809 ↗
  31. Mandar, W. S. (2020). Learning Strategies for Arabic Grammar at the West Sulawesi in Understanding the Heritage Books (A Case Study at Allo Biqar Pambusuang Foundation, Polewali. ISLLCE 2019: Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Languare, Literature, Culture and Education, ISLLCE, 15-16 November 2019, Kendari, Indonesia , 107. find
  32. Marek, M. W., & Wu, W.-C. V. (2014). Environmental factors affecting computer assisted language learning success: A complex dynamic systems conceptual model. Computer Assisted Language Learning , 27 (6), 560–578. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.776969 ↗
  33. Please cite this article as Bahy, M.B.A., Ulum, M.S., Zuhdy, H., Rahman A., Taufiq, M.A., Naf’an, A.W. (2025). Exploring the Interplay of Personality, Learning Strategies, and Learning Environment in Mastering Arabic Grammar. Izdihar : Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 8(2), 163-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v8i2.38146 ↗
  34. Marengo, D., Davis, K. L., Gradwohl, G. Ö., & Montag, C. (2021). A meta-analysis on individual differences in primary emotional systems and Big Five personality traits. Scientific Reports , 11 (1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84366-8 Mehak Jawed, Dr. ↗
  35. Kamran Ali, & Tanveer Ahmed. (2025). Exploring the Connection between Presence and Absence of Krashen’s Theory on Learner’s Input and Affective Filters: A Triangulation Approach. Journal of Arts and Linguistics Studies , 3 (2), 1811–1839. https://doi.org/10.71281/jals.v3i2.305 ↗
  36. Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif . Remaja Rosdakarya. find
  37. Muslimin, A. I., & Suhartoyo, E. (2024). Exploring the Dynamic Interplay of Personality, Language Learning Strategies, and Environment in Indonesian EFL Learners’ Success. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies , 24 (1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v24i1.558 ↗
  38. Mustafawi, E., Shaaban, K., Khwaileh, T., & Ata, K. (2022). Perceptions and attitudes of Qatar University students regarding the utility of arabic and english in communication and education in Qatar. In Language Policy (Vol. 21, Nomor 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-021-09590-4 ↗
  39. Nopiana, N., Egie, J., & Mers, O. (2022). The Impact of Internet Addiction on Introvert Personality. World Psychology , 1 (2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.55849/wp.v1i2.97 ↗
  40. Panadero, E. (2023). Toward a paradigm shift in feedback research: Five further steps influenced by self-regulated learning theory. Educational Psychologist , 58 (3), 193– 204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2223642 ↗
  41. Piaget, J. (1976). Piaget’s theory . Springer. find
  42. Ramirez-Arellano, A. (2024). Effects of Personality and Motivation on Students’ Academic Engagement and Metacognitive-Cognitive Strategies. SAGE Open , 14 (4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241295845 ↗
  43. Ritonga, M., & Nurdianto, T. (2022). Strategies for improving Arabic language ability through language Environment: Phenomenology studies in Islamic boarding schools. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies , 18 (1), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.198 ↗
  44. Romiszowski, A. J. (2024). Producing instructional systems: Lesson planning for individualized and group learning activities . Taylor & Francis. find
  45. Safa, C. (2023). Students’ and Teachers’ Attitudes towards the Use of Learning Strategies to Improve Learners’ Achievement in Grammar . find
  46. Sayfulloevna, S. S. (2023). Safe learning environment and personal development of students. International Journal of Formal Education , 2 (3), 7–12. http://journals.academiczone.net/index.php/ijfe ↗
  47. Seli, H. (2019). Motivation and learning strategies for college success: A focus on self-regulated learning . Routledge. p-ISSN : 2622-738X e-ISSN : 2622-7371 find
  48. Shodiq, M. J., Zakiyah, Z., & Hajib, Z. A. (2021). The Effectiveness of Grammatical Hunting Game Method Students’ Arabic Learning Motivation. Jurnal Al Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab , 13 (1), 149–166. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/albayan.v13i1.7344 ↗
  49. Soleimani, N., Nagahi, M., Nagahisarchoghaei, M., & Jaradat, R. (2018). The relationship between personality types and the cognitive-metacognitive strategies. Journal of Studies in Education , 8 (2), 29–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jse.v8i2.12767 ↗
  50. Soliman, R. K. (2022). Learners’ Perception of Arabic Grammar. In Teaching and Learning Arabic Grammar (hal. 122–149). Routledge. find
  51. Sugiyono, P. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Alpabeta, Bandung . find
  52. Tai, K. W. H., & Zhao, Y. V. (2024). Success factors for English as a second language university students’ attainment in academic English language proficiency: Exploring the roles of secondary school medium-of-instruction, motivation and language learning strategies. Applied Linguistics Review , 15 (2), 611–641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0049 ↗
  53. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2020). Exploring university teaching and learning: Experience and context . Springer Nature. find
  54. Tseng, W. T., & Gao, X. (Andy). (2021). Individual Differences in Second Language Learning: the Road Ahead. English Teaching and Learning , 45 (3), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-021-00097-z ↗
  55. Tzuriel, D., & Tzuriel, D. (2021). The socio-cultural theory of Vygotsky. Mediated learning and cognitive modifiability , 53–66. find
  56. Ummi, S. I., Janudin, S. Y., Atoh, N., Majdah, C., Amizura, H. M. R., Noraini, I., Nadhilah, A. P., & Mohamad, F. M. Z. (2022). Monitor Model Theory as a Solution to Overcome the Problem of Mastering Arabic Grammar Among Students in Malaysia. Theory and Practice in Language Studies , 12 (8), 1516–1524. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1208.07 ↗
  57. Vinnervik, P. (2022). Implementing programming in school mathematics and technology: teachers’ intrinsic and extrinsic challenges. International Journal of Technology and Design Education , 32 (1), 213–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09602-0 ↗
  58. Vo, H., Hoang, T. T. H., & Mu, G. M. (2025). Exploring the dynamic relations between second language students’ classroom engagement and task value belief: A longitudinal study. Learning and Instruction , 95 (August 2024), 102025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102025 ↗
  59. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press. find
  60. Winarti, E., & Fauziah, F. (2023). A Humanistic Overview: Implementation Of Please cite this article as Bahy, M.B.A., Ulum, M.S., Zuhdy, H., Rahman A., Taufiq, M.A., Naf’an, A.W. (2025). Exploring the Interplay of Personality, Learning Strategies, and Learning Environment in Mastering Arabic Grammar. Izdihar : Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 8(2), 163-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v8i2.38146 Independent Learning For Arabic At Islamic Universities. Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning , 6 (3), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v6i3.23036 ↗
  61. Xi, J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2021). Scaffolding and the zone of proximal development: A problematic relationship. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour , 51 (1), 25–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12260 ↗
  62. Yee, D. M., & Braver, T. S. (2018). Interactions of motivation and cognitive control. Current opinion in behavioral sciences , 19 , 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.11.009 ↗
  63. Zaretsky, V. K. (2021). One More Time on the Zone of Proximal Development. Cultural-Historical Psychology , 17 (2), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2021170204 ↗
  64. Zarrati, Z., Zohrabi, M., Abedini, H., & Xodabande, I. (2024). Learning academic vocabulary with digital flashcards: Comparing the outcomes from computers and smartphones. Social Sciences and Humanities Open , 9 (November 2024), 100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100900 ↗
  65. Zhao, J. (2023). Innovative Design and Research on Cooperative Learning of English and a Second Foreign Language in a Multimedia Environment. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics , 9 (2), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.902008 ↗
  66. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice , 41 (2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 ↗
  67. Zurqoni, Retnawati, H., Rahmatullah, S., Djidu, H., & Apino, E. (2020). Has arabic language learning been successfully implemented? International Journal of Instruction , 13 (4), 715–730. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13444a p-ISSN : 2622-738X e-ISSN : 2622-7371 ↗

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/bahy-2025-exploring-interaction-personality-strategy-learning/