Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2025 / Voice-placing strategies and folk ideas of L2-accented Icelandic.

Voice-placing strategies and folk ideas of L2-accented Icelandic.

Paper · 2025 · Stefanie Bade

Summary

Iceland's long monolingual and monoethnic profile is changing quickly through immigration. This qualitative study asks how L1 Icelanders try to work out where an L2-accented speaker comes from, and what lay beliefs shape those guesses. Using perceptual dialectology and folk linguistics, the author ran five semi-structured focus groups with 32 L1 participants. Each group heard six verbal guises: one L1 Icelandic speaker and five L2 speakers whose first languages were American English, Danish, Tagalog, Lithuanian, and Polish. Participants placed each voice and then explained their choices freely. The discussions were coded with grounded-theory concepts.

Listeners reliably noticed that a speaker was non-native but struggled to pin down the origin. They relied on three strategies: how familiar the accent felt, cultural stereotypes, and specific phonological cues. Beliefs about a speaker's competence, learning effort, and ability to mimic accents shaped all three. The study matters because it documents early folk perceptions of L2 Icelandic in a community that has little experience with accented speech.

Key points

  • Over ten years, immigrants grew from 8% to 18% of Iceland's residents. Poles make up 35.7% of immigrants, Lithuanians 7.2%, and Ukrainians 5.6% (Statistics Iceland).
  • Design: 5 focus groups, 32 L1 participants, and 6 verbal guises (1 L1, 5 L2), plus free elaboration. Map placements were also collected.
  • Listeners kept the L1/L2 distinction largely intact but placed origins poorly. The Danish speaker was misplaced, and a stereotype led some to place the L1 Icelandic guise in Germany.
  • Two cues stood out. A raised /œ/ was tied to Danish speakers. Realizing ⟨u⟩ as [ʊ] rather than [ʏ], as in "kringum", was tied to Polish/Eastern European speakers. Some listeners linked the latter to the construction trades.
  • For comparison, over 90% of L1 listeners correctly place the northern harðmæli variant. That L1 feature has a stable, socially recognized meaning, which L2 features may or may not acquire.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. The task separates detection ("is this non-native?") from localization ("from where?"), and the two turn out to differ sharply in difficulty. Reporting a coarse subtask and a fine one separately shows where competence actually breaks down.
  • I2. A native speaker was mixed in among the accented guises as a hidden control, and listeners still assigned it a foreign origin because of a stereotype. Unmarked controls expose bias that only shows up when the judge expects a positive.
  • I3. Every placement decision was followed by a free justification, and the justifications were then grouped into strategy types (familiarity, stereotype, phonetic cue). Classifying reasons, and not just answers, reveals which kind of evidence drives each decision.
  • I4. Listeners' priors, such as demographic base rates and stereotypes about who speaks good Icelandic, sometimes overrode the acoustic evidence in front of them. Prior knowledge and observed evidence should be kept apart so that a reader can tell which one decided.
  • I5. The most defensible placements rested on one concrete, nameable feature: a single vowel in a single word. A pinpointed cue is far easier to check and explain than a vague overall impression.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (learn): Score coarse decisions (e.g., is there an agent at all?) separately from fine ones (which role, which entity), so that a good aggregate score cannot hide a weak fine-grained step.
  • I2 (learn): Seed evaluation sets with items where nothing unusual is present, such as no irony, no implicature, or no coreference link, to catch components that hallucinate a phenomenon because the test format implies one.
  • I3 (answer): Make readers attach a reason tag to each answer (textual evidence, world-knowledge prior, or default), then audit the tag distribution on wrong answers.
  • I4 (world): Store compiled-knowledge defaults separately from facts asserted by the text, and let a text-stated fact always override a default, with the override logged.
  • I5 (tokens): Flag non-standard learner-English forms as explicit, named morphological features rather than silent corrections, so that later stages can cite exactly which token triggered a decision.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Fields, topics and concepts

📚 Shelves 4The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Arts and Humanities · 16,039 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 15,891 worksPsychology · 1,552 worksExperimental and Cognitive Psychology · 870 works

Cite

Cite as Stefanie Bade. 2025. Voice-placing strategies and folk ideas of L2-accented Icelandic. Linguistik Online 134.

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.13092/lo.134.12181

@inproceedings{bade2025voice,
  title = {{Voice-placing strategies and folk ideas of L2-accented Icelandic.}},
  author = {Stefanie Bade},
  booktitle = {Linguistik Online 134},
  year = {2025},
  doi = {10.13092/lo.134.12181},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.134.12181}
}

References

52 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Adank, Patti/Hagoort, Peter/Bekkering, Harold (2010): “Imitation improves language comprehension”. Psychological Science 21: 1903–1909. find
  2. Árnason, Kristján (2005a): “Íslenska og enska: Vísir að greiningu á málvistkerfi.” Ritið 2: 99– 140. find
  3. Árnason, Kristján (2005b): Íslensk tunga I: Hljóð Reykjavík: Almenna bókafélagið. find
  4. Árnason, Kristján (2011): The phonology of Icelandic and Faroese. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ↗
  5. Árnason, Kristján (2017): ”Málloftslag í útnorðri” In: Hansen, Zakaris Svabo et al. (eds.): Bók Jógvan. Heiðursrit til Jógvan í Lon Jacobsen á 60 ára degnum. Torshavn, Faroe University Press: 17–35. find
  6. Árnason, Kristján (2024): “Ideologies and linguistic development in North Germanic”. In: Hamans, Camiel/Hock, Henrich (eds.): Language, History, Ideology: The Use and Misuse of Historical-Comparative Linguistics. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 32–51. Arnbjörnsdóttir, Birna/Ingvarsdóttir, Hafdís (eds.) (2018): Language development across the lifespan: The impact of English on education and work in Iceland. Cham: Springer. (= Educational Linguistics 34). ↗
  7. Atlas.ti (2020): Atlas.ti: The Qualitative Data Analysis & Research Software. atlasti.com/ [27.01.2025]. find
  8. Auer, Peter (2005): “Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or a typology of European dialect/standard constellations”. In: Delbecque, Nicole/van der Auwera, Johan/Geeraerts, Dirk (eds.): Perspectives on variation. Berlin/New York, de Gruyter: 7–42. ↗
  9. Bade, Stefanie (2018): “Hvernig meta Íslendingar fólk sem talar með hreim? Greining á duldum viðhorfum með sérstöku tilliti til kyns og aldurs” Orð og tunga 20: 121–146. ↗
  10. Bade, Stefanie (2019): “Evaluations of foreign accents in a purist speech community: The case of Iceland”. In: Villena-Ponsoda, Juan-Andrés et al. (eds.): Language variation: European perspectives VII. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins: 53–70. find
  11. Bade, Stefanie (2023): Accents and folk linguistics: A grounded-theoretical analysis of Icelanders’ reactions to foreigners’ use of Icelandic. Doctoral dissertation University of Iceland, Reykjavík. opinvisindi.is/handle/20.500.11815/4264 [27.01.2025]. find
  12. Bade, Stefanie (2024): “Folk perceptions and evaluations of L2-accented Icelandic with regard to pleasantness and correctness”. Sociolinguistica 38/2: 167–191. Bade, Stefanie/Sigurjónsdóttir, Eva Hrund (2024): “Employing intelligibility ratings of accentedness for learner-centred pronunciation instruction in Icelandic as a second language”. In: Bédi, Branislav/Štvrtecká, Lenka (eds.): Novel Techniques and Approaches in Language Teaching (NoTALat). Short Papers from the NoTALaT Conference, 16–17 May 2024. Reykjavík, Rannsóknarstofa í máltileinkun: 7–15. Barrett, Rusty/Cramer, Jennifer/McGowan, Kevin B. (2022): English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. 3 rd ed. London: Routledge. Bijvoet, Ellen/Fraurud, Kari (2015): “What’s the target? A folk linguistic study of young Stock-holmers’ constructions of linguistic norm and variation.” Language Awareness 25/1–2: 17–39. ↗
  13. Carey, Michael D./Mannell, Robert H./Dunn, Peter K. (2010): “Does a rater’s familiarity with a candidate’s pronunciation affect the rating in oral proficiency interviews?” Language Testing 28/2: 201–219. Cargile, Aaron C./Giles, Howard (1997): “Understanding language attitudes: Exploring listener affect and identity”. Language and Communication 17: 434–443. find
  14. Charmaz, Kathy (2006): Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage. find
  15. Cramer, Jennifer (2018): “The emic and the etic in perceptual dialectology”. In: Evans, Betsy E./Benson, Erica J./Stanford, James N. (eds.): Language regard: Methods, variation and change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 62–79. ↗
  16. Cukor-Avila, Patricia et al. (2012): “ʽTexas – It’s like a whole nuther countryʼ: Mapping Texans’ perceptions of dialect variation in the Lone Star State”. Texas Linguistics Forum 55. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Symposium about Language and Society. Austin, University of Texas at Austin: 10–99. Derwing, Tracey/Munro, Murray (2009): “Putting accent in its place; Rethinking obstacles to communication”. Language Teaching 42: 476–490. Evans, Betsy E./Benson, Erica J./Stanford, James N. (eds.) (2018): Language regard: Methods, variation and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. find
  17. Flege, James E. et al. (2006): “Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults”. Journal of Phonetics 34: 153–175. Fraser, Catriona/Kelly, Barbara F. (2012): “Listening between the lines: Social assumptions around foreign accents”. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 35/1: 74–93. ↗
  18. Friðriksson, Finnur (2008): Language change vs. stability in conservative language communities: A case study of Icelandic. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg dissertation. Friðriksson, Finnur/Angantýsson, Ásgrímur/Bade, Stefanie (2024): “Icelandic regional pronunciation, attitudes and real-time change: Latest developments”. Sociolinguistica 38/2: 261– 290. find
  19. Frumkin, Lara (2007): “Influences of accent and ethnic background on perceptions of eyewitness testimony”. Psychology, Crime and Law 13: 317–331. ↗
  20. Garrett, Peter (2010): Attitudes to Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ↗
  21. Giles, Howard (1970): “Evaluative reactions to accents”. Educational Review 22/3: 211–227. Glaser, Barney/Strauss, Anselm (1967): The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick/London: AldineTransaction. Gluszek, Agata/Dovidio, John F. (2010): “The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication”. Personality and social psychology review 14/2: 214–237. ↗
  22. Guðmundsdóttir, Margrét (2022): Mál á mannsævi. 70 ára þróun tilbrigða í framburði – eins-taklingar og samfélag (‘Language in a lifetime. 70 years’ development of pronunciation variants – individuals and community’). University of Iceland dissertation thesis. hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3419 [28.01.2025]. find
  23. Guðmundsdóttir, Margrét (2024): Language change across the lifespan: A changing status of a local variant. Sociolinguistica 38/2: 237 – 259. find
  24. Guðmundsdóttir, Dagbjört/Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður/Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur (2020): “Stafrænt málsambýli íslensku og ensku. Athugun á málumhverfi og málnotkun 13– 98 ára Íslendinga” (‘Digital language contact between Icelandic and English’). Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 41/42: 167–210. find
  25. Hálfdánarson, Guðmundur (2001): Íslenska þjóðríkið: uppruni og endamörk. (‘The Icelandic nation state: origins and confines’). Reykjavík: Hið Íslenska bókmenntafélag & Reykjavíkur Akademían. find
  26. Hauksdóttir, Auður (2016): “The Role of the Danish Language in Iceland”. Linguistik online 79/5: 77–91. doi.org/10.13092/lo.79.3335. Hilmarsson-Dunn, Amanda/Kristiansson, Ari Páll (2010): “The language situation in Iceland”. Current Issues in Language Planning 1/3: 207–276. Hundt, Stefan/Lasch, Alexander/Anders, Ada C. (eds.). (2010): Perceptual dialectology. Neue Wege der Dialektologie. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. Irvine, Judith T./Gal, Susan (2000): “Language ideology and linguistic differentiation”. In: Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.): Regimes of language: ideologies, polities, and identities. Santa Fe/New Mexico, School of American Research Press: 35–83. ↗
  27. Jökulsdóttir, Tinna Frímann et al. (2019): “Um nýyrði sem tengjast tölvum og tækni” (‘On Icelandic neologisms which relate to computers and technology’). Orð og tunga 21: 101– 128. Kang, Okim/Rubin, Donald L. (2009): “Reverse linguistic stereotyping: Measuring the effect of listener expectation on speech evaluation”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 28: 441–456. ↗
  28. Kristiansen, Gitte (2001): “Social and linguistic stereotyping: A cognitive approach to accents”. Estudios de la Universidad Complutense 329: 129–145. ↗
  29. Kristiansen, Tore (2010): “Conscious and subconscious attitudes towards English influence in the Nordic countries: Evidence for two levels of language ideology”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 204: 59–95. ↗
  30. Kristinsson, Ari Páll (2017): Málheimar: Sitthvað um málstefnu og málnotkun (‘Worlds of language: on language policy and language use’). Reykjavík: Háskólaútgáfan. find
  31. Kristinsson, Ari Páll (2018): “National language policy and planning in Iceland – Aims and institutional activities”. In: Stickel, Gerhard (ed.): National language institutions and national languages. Budapest, Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences: 243–249. find
  32. Labov, William (1972): Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Leonard, Stephen Pax/Árnason, Kristján (2011): “Language ideology and standardisation in Iceland”. In: Kristiansen, Tore/Coupland, Niklas (eds.): Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe. Oslo, Novus: 91–96. find
  33. Lett, James (1990): “Emics and etics: Notes on the epistemology of anthropology”. In: Headland, Thomas N./Pike, Kenneth L./Harris, Marvin (eds.): Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate. Frontiers of anthropology. Newbury Park, Sage: 127–142. Levon, Erez/Sharma, Devyani/Ilbury, Christian (2022): Speaking Up: Accents and Social Mobility. London: Sutton Trust. find
  34. Lindemann, Stephanie (2002): “Listening with an attitude: A model of native-speaker comprehension of non-native speakers in the United States”. Language in Society 31: 419–441. ↗
  35. Lindemann, Stephanie (2003): “Koreans, Chinese or Indians? Attitudes and ideologies about non-native English speakers in the United States”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7/3: 348–364. ↗
  36. Lindemann, Stephanie (2005): “Who speaks ‘broken English’? US undergraduates’ perceptions of non-native English”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15/2: 187–212. Málspjal. Facebook group: facebook.com/groups/348609846533094 [29.01.2025]. find
  37. Moyer, Alene (2013): Foreign accent: The phenomenon of non-native speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ↗
  38. Moyer, Alene (2014): “The social nature of pronunciation”. In: Lewis, John M./Moyer, Alene (eds.): Social Dynamics in Second Language Accent. Berlin, de Gruyter: 11–29. Munro, Murray J./Derwing, Tracey M. (1995): “Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech”. Language and Speech 38/3: 289– 306. find
  39. Niedzielski, Nancy A. (1999): “The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables”. In: Milroy, Lesley/Preston, Dennis R. (eds.): Attitudes, Perception, and Linguistic Issues. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18/1, Special issue: 1162– 185. Niedzielski, Nancy A./Preston, Dennis R. (2003): Folk linguistics. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. Nowenstein, Iris/Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður (2024): “Perceived threats to the future of Icelandic and the importance of language acquisition research”. Sociolinguistica 38/2: 143–165. OpenStreetMap contributors (2015): Iceland. openstreetmap.org/#map=7/65.010/-19.021 [26.01.2025]. ↗
  40. Ottósson, Kjartan G. (1990): Íslensk málhreinsun. Sögulegt yfirlit. Reykjavík: Íslensk mál-nefnd. find
  41. Preston, Dennis R. (1989): Perceptual Dialectology. Dordrecht/Providence: Foris. find
  42. Preston, Dennis R. (ed.) (1999): Handbook of perceptual dialectology. Vol. 1. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins. find
  43. Preston, Dennis R. (2010): “Language, people, salience, space: Perceptual dialectology and language regard”. Dialectologia 5: 87–131. find
  44. Preston, Dennis R. (2018): “Language regard: What, why, how, whither?” In: Evans, Betsy E./Benson, Erica J./Stanford, James N. (eds.): Language regard: Methods, variation and change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 3–28. Purcell, Edward T./Suter, Richard W. (1980): “Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A reexamination”. Language Learning 30: 271–287. ↗
  45. Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur (2022): Alls konar íslenska: Hundrað þættir um íslenskt mál á 21. öld. Reykjavík: Mál og menning. Ryan, Ellen B./Bulik, Cynthia M. (1982): “Evaluations of middle class and lower class speakers of standard American and German-accented English”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 1/1: 51–61. find
  46. Sigurjónsdóttir, Eva Hrund (2024): Munnholsveiklun í íslensku. Athugun á útbreiðslu höggmælis í 185 manna úrtaki. MA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík. hdl.handle.net/1946/46051 [28.01.2025]. find
  47. Skaptadóttir, Unnur Dís/Innes, Pamela (2017): “Immigrant experiences of learning Icelandic and connecting with the speaking community”. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 7/1: 20–27. ↗
  48. Statistics Iceland (2022): Population by origin 1996–2022. statice.is/publications/news-archive/inhabitants/immigrants-and-persons-with-foreign-background-2022/ [26.01.2025]. find
  49. Statistics Iceland (2023): Inhabitants’ background: Immigrants. statice.is/statistics/population/inhabitants/background/ [26.01.2025]. find
  50. Statistics Iceland (2024): The country’s population was 383,726 at the beginning of 2024. statice.is/publications/news-archive/inhabitants/the-population-on-1-january-2024/ [26.01. 2025]. find
  51. Stoeckle, Philipp (2012): “The folk linguistic construction of local dialect areas – linguistic and extra-linguistic factors”. In: Hansen, Sandra et al. (eds.): Dialectological and Folk Dialectological Concepts of Space: Current Methods and Perspectives in Sociolinguistic Research on Dialect Change. Berlin/Boston, de Gruyter: 142–163. Þráinsson, Höskuldur/Angantýsson, Ásgrímur/Sigurðsson, Einar Freyr (eds.) (2013): Tilbrigði í íslenskri setningagerð: I. Markmið, aðferðir og efniviður. Reykjavík: Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands. ↗
  52. Tómasdóttir, Ása Bergný (2024): Alþýðuhugmyndir um svæðisbundin framburðartilbrigði í íslensku: Vitund, viðhorf og sjálfsmynd. MA thesis, University of Iceland, Reykjavík. hdl.handle.net/1946/46562 [28.01.2025]. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/bade-2025-voice-placing-strategies-folk-ideas/