Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2021 / Should standard Arabic have "the lion's share?": Teacher ideologies in L2 Arabic through the lens of pedagogical translanguaging

Should standard Arabic have "the lion's share?": Teacher ideologies in L2 Arabic through the lens of pedagogical translanguaging

Summary

The paper asks why translanguaging, meaning the classroom use of a learner's full linguistic repertoire, remains marginal in teaching Arabic as a second language. Arabic is multiglossic, and programs traditionally give Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) priority over dialects and over English. The authors interviewed three L2 Arabic teachers (Marawan, Adam, Sherine), first giving them an in-depth questionnaire and then conducting a targeted semi-structured interview. During the interview, teachers were confronted with arguments from translanguaging pedagogy, so the interview also worked as an intervention meant to start their conceptual development.

The main finding is a gap between belief and practice. Teachers initially said they resisted mixing languages, yet their accounts showed frequent mixing of MSA, dialects and English for many purposes. As the dialogue went on, some teachers developed a more open, internally persuasive stance. They also kept legitimate reservations, especially that proficiency tests still target a single variety.

The study matters because it shows that teachers' monolingual ideologies can limit learning. It argues for cautious adoption of translanguaging and for classroom-based research on what effective pedagogy looks like in a multidialectal language.

Key points

  • The study builds on Ryding's notion of "reverse privileging": MSA, a secondary discourse, is taught first, while the dialect people actually speak comes late or not at all.
  • It is a qualitative study of three teachers, using a survey, then a semi-structured interview in which translanguaging positions were presented as challenges.
  • Teachers mixed MSA, dialects, English and occasionally home languages, often more than they realized. English was accepted mainly as a way to ease comprehension.
  • Programs that require MSA for reading and writing, with a dialect component for speaking and listening, appear to shape teacher ideology. Marawan and Adam still treated the codes as separate systems.
  • Only Sherine endorsed fluidity, for a specific learner community, and even she doubted translanguaging could coexist with target-language proficiency testing. All three would accept it if classroom research showed it works.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. What practitioners say they do and what they actually do can differ, so stated policy must be checked against observed behaviour rather than trusted. — For Mova (learn): Audit each component by comparing its declared rules or config against its actual decisions on held-out text, and flag components whose real behaviour drifts from their stated policy.
  • I2. Speakers draw on one integrated repertoire rather than switching between sealed language boxes, so mixed input is normal rather than noise. — For Mova (tokens): Let the tokenizer and tagger handle embedded foreign words and code-mixed spans as ordinary input with their own tags, instead of failing or forcing everything into English categories.
  • I3. Confronting participants with counter-positions mid-interview surfaces hidden assumptions and shows which beliefs are stable and which shift. — For Mova (learn): Probe the LLM teacher tiers with deliberate counter-arguments to their silver labels, and keep only labels that survive the challenge.
  • I4. A standard variety can be over-privileged while the varieties people really use are neglected, which skews what learners can handle. — For Mova (tree): Make sure parser training and evaluation include informal and non-standard English registers, not only edited standard text, so the treebank mix reflects real input.
  • I5. Tracing word origins can open a channel to the history and cultural context behind vocabulary. — For Mova (world): Attach etymology and origin links to lexical entries in the knowledge graph, so explanations can cite where a word came from when cultural context matters for understanding a text.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

Fields: Linguistics & languages

Topics: Semitic languages

Cite

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.29140/ice.v4n1.442

@inproceedings{azaz2021should,
  title = {{Should standard Arabic have "the lion's share?": Teacher ideologies in L2 Arabic through the lens of pedagogical translanguaging}},
  author = {Azaz, Mahmoud and Abourehab, Yousra},
  booktitle = {Intercultural Communication Education 4},
  year = {2021},
  doi = {10.29140/ice.v4n1.442},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.29140/ice.v4n1.442}
}

References

40 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Abourehab, Y. & Azaz, M. (2020). Pedagogical translanguaging in community/heritage Arabic language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1826496 ↗
  2. Albirini, A. (2016). Modern Arabic sociolinguistics: Diglossia, variation, codeswitching, attitudes and identity. London: Routledge. find
  3. Al-Batal, M. (Ed.). (2017). Arabic as one language: Integrating dialect in the Arabic language curriculum. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. find
  4. Al Masaeed, K. (2020). Translanguaging in L2 Arabic Study Abroad: Beyond Monolingual Practices in Institutional Talk. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 250– 266. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12623 ↗
  5. Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5th ed.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. find
  6. Bassiouney, R. (2009). Arabic sociolinguistics: Topics in diglossia, gender, identity, and politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. find
  7. Canagarajah, S. (2011). Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy. Applied Linguistics Review 2, 1–28. find
  8. Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching? The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 103–115. find
  9. Celic, C., & Seltzer, K. (2011). Translanguaging: A CUNY-NYSIEB guide for educators. New York, NY: CUNY-NYSIEB. find
  10. Cenoz, J. (2019). Translanguaging pedagogies and English as a lingua franca. Language Teaching, 52(1), 71–85. find
  11. Cenoz, J., & Santos, A. (2020). Implementing pedagogical translanguaging in trilingual schools. System, 10, 22–73. find
  12. Egaña, E. A., Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs in multilingual education in the Basque country and in Friesland. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3(2), 169–193. find
  13. Fantini, A. E. (2012). Language: An essential component of intercultural communicative competence. In J. Jackson J (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication (pp. 263–278). London: Routledge. find
  14. Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15(2), 325–340. find
  15. Galante, A. (2020). Pedagogical translanguaging in a multilingual English program in Canada: Student and teacher perspectives of challenges. System, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102274 ↗
  16. García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley, Blackwell. find
  17. García, O. (2011). Theorizing translanguaging for educators. In C. Celic and K. Seltzer, Translanguaging: A CUNY-NYSIEB guide for educators (pp. 1–6). New York, NY: CUNY-NYSIEB. Retrieved from http://www.nysieb.ws.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/06/FINAL-Translanguaging-Guide-With-Cover-1.pdf. ↗
  18. García, O., & Sylvan, C.E. (2011). Pedagogies and practices in multilingual classrooms: Singularities in pluralities. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 385–400. find
  19. García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging, bilingualism, and bilingual education. In W. Wright, S. Boun, & O. García (Eds.), The handbook of bilingual and multilingual education (pp. 223– 240). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. find
  20. García, O., & Lin, A. (2016). Translanguaging and Bilingual Education. In García, O. ,Lin, A. & May, S. (eds.). Bilingual Education (Vol. 5). Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp. 117–130). Cham: Springer. find
  21. Hillman, S., Graham, K. M., & Eslami, Z. R. (2019). Teachers’ translanguaging ideologies and practices at an international branch campus in Qatar. English Teaching & Learning, 43(1), 41– 63. find
  22. Holdway, J., & Hitchcock, C. H. (2018). Exploring ideological becoming in professional development for teachers of multilingual learners: Perspectives on translanguaging in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 60–70. find
  23. Hua, Z. & Wei, L. (2020). Translanguaging, identity, and migration. Forthcoming in In J. Jackson J (ed.) The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. find
  24. Jaspers, J. (2018). The transformative limits of translanguaging. Language & Communication, 58, 1– 10. find
  25. Kramsch, C. & Whiteside, A. (2008). Language ecology in multilingual settings: towards a theory of symbolic competence’. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 645–71. find
  26. Lewis, G., Jones, B., & Baker, C. (2012). Translanguaging: Developing its conceptualization and contextualization. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(7), 655–670. find
  27. Otheguy, R., García, O., & Reid, W. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 6, 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2015-0014 ↗
  28. Risager, K. (2006). Language and culture: Global flows and local complexity. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. find
  29. Risager, K. (2012). Linguaculture and transnationality: The cultural dimensions of language. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 101–115). London: Routledge. find
  30. Ryding, K. C. (2009). Educated spoken Arabic: A flexible spoken standard. The NECTFL Review, 64, 49–52. find
  31. Shiri, S. (2015). Intercultural communicative competence development during and after language study abroad: Insights from Arabic. Foreign Language Annals, 48(4), 541–569. find
  32. Tian, Z. (2020). Faculty first: Promoting translanguaging in TESOL teacher education. In Sunny Man Chu LauSaskia Van Viegen (Eds.), Plurilingual pedagogies: Critical and creative endeavors for equitable language education (pp. 215–236). Cham: Springer. find
  33. Ticheloven, A., Blom, E., Leseman, P., & McMonagle, S. ( 2019). Translanguaging challenges in multilingual classrooms: scholar, teacher and student perspectives. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1686002 ↗
  34. Trentman, E. (2021). Reframing monolingual ideologies in the language classroom: Evidence from Arabic study abroad and telecollaboration. In B. Dupuy & K. Michelson (Eds.), Pathways to paradigm change: Critical examinations of prevailing discourses and ideologies in second language education (pp. 108–132). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. find
  35. Turner, M., & Lin, A. (2020). Translanguaging and named languages: Productive tension and desire. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. (23) 4, 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1360243 ↗
  36. Wei, L. (2011). Moment analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1222–1235. find
  37. Williams, C. (1994). Arfarniad o Ddulliau Dysgu ac Addysgu yng Nghyd-destun Addysg Uwchradd Ddwyieithog, [An evaluation of teaching and learning methods in the context of bilingual secondary education]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Wales, Bangor. find
  38. Yilmaz, T. (2019). Translanguaging as a pedagogy for equity of language minoritized students. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1640705 ↗
  39. Younes, M. (2014). The integrated approach to Arabic instruction. Routledge. find
  40. London Zhu, H. (2015). Negotiation as the way of engagement in intercultural and lingua franca communication: Frames of reference and Interculturality. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 4(1), 63–90. Author biodata Mahmoud Azaz is Associate Professor of Arabic language, linguistics & pedagogy and second language acquisition & teaching at the University of Arizona. He holds a Ph.D. with Distinction in Arabic SLA and Pedagogy. His research focuses on Arabic SLA from linguistic and sociocultural perspectives. He is a Distinguished Fellow at the University of Arizona Center for University Education Scholarship, and the current Arabic Sector Head at the American University of American Association of University Supervisors, Coordinators, and Directors of Language Programs.) Yousra Abourehab is a PhD student at the department of Teaching, Learning and Sociocultural Studies at the University of Arizona. She holds an M.A in Language, Reading and Culture with focus on bi/multilingual education, biliteracy, and language socialization. Her research interests include Arabic-English bilingualism, multilingualism, language and migration, and Arabic second language acquisition from a sociocultural perspective. find

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/azaz-2021-should-standard-arabic-have-lion/