Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2020 / On the Specificity of Event Actualization in an English Verb Phrase Headed by a Verb of Movement

On the Specificity of Event Actualization in an English Verb Phrase Headed by a Verb of Movement

Paper · 2020 · D. A. Axelrood and M. S. Brodskaya

Summary

This is a theoretical, cognitive-semantic study of English motion verbs. It does not use a corpus, a treebank, or an evaluation metric. The authors begin with the motion-verb group from B. Levin's 1993 classification. They argue that existing verb taxonomies (Vendler, Wierzbicka, Dowty, Chafe, Fillmore, Levin) keep subdividing this part of the lexicon without producing a clean, qualitative categorisation. Their alternative is a fine-grained decomposition of each verb into two layers. The first is a root seme that carries the core meaning of the situation. The second is a set of extra semes that context adds for functional, stylistic or socio-psychological reasons. From this they introduce "allosemants": positional, context-bound variants of a polysemous verb. They also compare how verb-framed and satellite-framed motion events are built. In the satellite-framed type they see a word-formation pattern based on cognitive compression, where MANNER, PATH or INSTRUMENT is folded into the verb itself. This gives a view of how the English motion lexicon grows.

Key points

  • The source material is the motion-verb group from Levin (1993). The paper also cites Kipper et al. (2008), the large-scale verb classification behind VerbNet.
  • The paper reviews Talmy's motion event components: Figure, Ground, activating process/Direction, and association function. It prefers Verkerk's (2015) definition: a mover travelling along a path relative to a ground, goal, source or other reference point.
  • English "motion" is split into two prototype semes:
    • 'move', meaning displacement, as in go and run;
    • 'action', meaning a movement performed as part of an action, as in put, wave and take.
  • The paper takes over Zlatev's (2003) seven spatial categories: the moving entity (Trajector), the entity it is situated against (Landmark), the Motion itself, the Frame of Reference, the Region, the Path, and the Direction. The paper also discusses deictic versus allocentric orientation, for example come to me versus come near the earth.
  • The new concepts are:
    • root seme;
    • allosemant;
    • cognitive compression as a word-formation mechanism;
    • incorporation of the MANNER, PATH and INSTRUMENT frame components into the verb.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. Separate a verb's invariant root meaning from context-added semes, so one lexical entry yields predictable contextual variants instead of a flat list of unrelated senses.
  • I2. Distinguish "displacement" motion (go, run) from "movement as part of an action" (put, wave), since only the first changes the mover's location.
  • I3. Treat verbs that have absorbed MANNER, PATH or INSTRUMENT as compressed frames that can be unpacked into the full motion event.
  • I4. Make verb-framed versus satellite-framed encoding explicit: path is carried by the verb in one case and by a particle or preposition in the other.
  • I5. Keep deictic and allocentric orientation of the trajector distinct, as with come to me versus come near the earth.

For Mova

How these ideas could serve Mova, our small open language model — its files, stages and tests:

  • I1 (frames): Frame assignment could fix the root frame from the VerbNet class first, then attach manner, style or intent features from the context as explainable modifiers.
  • I2 (world): The world builder could update an entity's location only for displacement verbs, and treat action-motion verbs as changes to the object or holding rather than to the agent's position.
  • I3 (world): Compiled verb-class knowledge could store which frame slot a verb has incorporated, so that a verb whose meaning includes a means or instrument fills that role implicitly in the world model.
  • I4 (back): Generation and translation through the meta-world could choose between "enter the room" and "go into the room" by deciding where to realise PATH, which keeps paraphrases faithful.
  • I5 (frames): Pragmatics could resolve the goal of come or go relative to the speaker or narrator when the orientation is deictic, and to a fixed landmark otherwise.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

 Institutions

Also on the byline: Pyatigorsk State University.

📚 Shelves 4The field of science this work belongs to (OpenAlex fields).Arts and Humanities · 9,296 worksLanguage and Linguistics · 9,206 worksPsychology · 798 worksExperimental and Cognitive Psychology · 463 works

🧭 Topics 1Research subjects and languages the work is about.English · 1,373 works

Cite

Cite as D. A. Axelrood and M. S. Brodskaya. 2020. On the Specificity of Event Actualization in an English Verb Phrase Headed by a Verb of Movement. Nauchnyi Dialog 0 (Научный диалог 0).

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-1-9-26

@inproceedings{axelrood2020specificity,
  title = {{On the Specificity of Event Actualization in an English Verb Phrase Headed by a Verb of Movement}},
  author = {D. A. Axelrood and M. S. Brodskaya},
  booktitle = {Nauchnyi Dialog 0 (Научный диалог 0)},
  year = {2020},
  doi = {10.24224/2227-1295-2020-1-9-26},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-1-9-26}
}

References

34 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Аксельруд Д. А. О когнитивно-семантической структуре события / Д. А. Аксельруд // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. — 2016a. — № 12—1 (66). — С. 56—59. find
  2. Аксельруд Д. А О зависимости структуры события от семантики профилирован-ной фигуры / Д. А. Аксельруд // Лингвистика XXI века : традиции и новации : сборник трудов по материалам международной научной конференции памяти профессора В. В. Лазарева. — Пятигорск : ПГЛУ, 2016б. — С. 3—8. find
  3. Арутюнова Н. Д. Типы языковых значений. Оценка. Событие. Факт / Н. Д. Ару-тюнов. — Москва : Наука, 1988. — 338 с. find
  4. Болдырев Н. Н. Функциональная категоризация английского глагола / Н. Н. Болдырев. — Москва-Берлин : Directmedia, 2016. — 211 c. find
  5. Бродская М. С. Когнитвно-семантические аспекты полисемии в условиях экс-прессивности английского глагола : автореферат диссертации … кандидата филологических наук : 10.02.04. — Пятигорск : ПГЛУ, 2014. — 30 с. find
  6. Булыгина Т. В. К построению типологии предикатов в русском языке / Т. В. Булыгина // Семантические типы предикатов / отв. ред. О. Н. Селиверстова. — Москва : Наука, 1982. — С. 7—85. find
  7. Вежбицкая А. Семантические универсалии и базисные концепты / А. Вежбицкая // Язык. Семиотика. Культура. — Москва : Языки славянских культур, 2011. — 568 с. find
  8. Долматова О. В. О базовой характеристике английских детерминативов / О. В. Долматова // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. — 2016. — № 9—2 (63). — С. 88—91. find
  9. Дубовский Ю. А. Когниолингвистический аспект оценочности в спонтанном дис-курсе. / Ю. А. Дубовский, Т. Б. Заграевская, О. Г. Колесник. — Пятигорск : Пятигорский государственный лингвистический университет, 2009. — 520 с. find
  10. Золотова Г. А. Коммуникативные аспекты русского синтаксиса / Г. А. Золотова. — Москва : Эдиториал УРСС, 2010. — 368 с. find
  11. Зубенко Н. В. Когнитивно-семантические параметры наречий с суффиксом –ly в английском языке : автореферат диссертации кандидата филологических наук : 10.02.04 / Н. В. Зубенко. — Пятигорск : ПГЛУ, 2015. — 30 с. find
  12. Падучева Е. В. Семантические исследования : Семантика времени и вида в русском языке ; Семантика нарратива / Е. В. Падучева // Язык. Семиотика. Культура. — Москва : Языки славянской культуры, 2010. — 480 с. find
  13. Шабанова Т. Д. Семантическая модель английских глаголов зрения : Теоретико-экспериментальное исследование / Т. Д. Шабанова. — Уфа : Восточный университет, 1998. — 198 с. find
  14. Шерсткова И. А. Английские глаголы воображения в когнитивном аспекте / И. А. Шерсткова, Ю. В. Валова // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. — Тамбов : Грамота, 2018. — № 8. — С. 410—414. find
  15. Chafe W. Meaning and the structure of the language / W. Chafe. — Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1970. — 374 p. find
  16. Croft W. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions / W. Croft, J. Barðdal, W. Hollmann V. Sotirova, Ch. Taoka // Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar. C. Boas Hans (ed.). — Constructional Approaches to Language, 2010. — V. 10. — Рp. 201—236. find
  17. Donnelly M. A linguistic account of mereological vagueness / M. Donnelly // K. Akiba and A. Abasnezhad (eds.) Vague objects and vague identity. — Springer, 2014. — 357 р. find
  18. Dowty D. R. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar : The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ / D. R. Dowty // Synthese language library. — V. 7, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1979. — 415 p. find
  19. Events, Arguments, and Aspects : Topics in the Semantics of Verbs / K. Robering (ed.). — Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014. — 384 p. — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.152. ↗
  20. Faber P. B. Constructing a Lexicon of English Verbs / P. B. Faber, R. Mairal Uson // Functional Grammar Series 23. — Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter, 1999. — 373 p. find
  21. Fillmore Ch. J. Frame semantics for text understanding / Ch. J. Fillmore, C. F. Baker // Proceedings of WordNet and Other Lexical Resources Workshop, NAACL. — 2001. — 6 p. find
  22. Kipper K. A large-scale classification of English verbs / K. Kipper, A. Korhonen, N. Ryant, M. Palmer // Language Resources and Evaluation. — Springer, Netherlands, 2008. — V. 42. — № 1. — Рp. 21—40. find
  23. Levin B. English classes and alternations / B. Levin. — Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 1993. — 348 p. find
  24. Landau B. “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition / B. Landau, R. Jackendoff // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. — 1993. — V. 16. — Pp. 217—265. find
  25. Malka Rappaport Hovav. Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure / Hovav Malka Rappaport, Edit Doron, Ivy Sichel. — Clarendon : Oxford University Press, 2010. — 421 p. find
  26. Parsons Terence. The Progressive In English : Events, States And Processes / Terence Parsons // Linguistics and Philosophy. — Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989. — V. 12. — Pp. 213—241. find
  27. Pietroski P. M. Events and Semantic Architecture / P. M. Pietroski. — Clarendon : Oxford University Press Inc., 2005. — 276 p. find
  28. Pustejovsky J. The Syntax of Event Structure / J. Pustejovsky // Cognition. — 1991. — V. 41. — Pp. 47—81. find
  29. Talmy L. Toward a cognitive semantics / L. Talmy // The MIT Press. — 2000. — V. 2. — 495 p. find
  30. Talmy L. Path to Realization : A Typology of Event Conflation / L. Talmy // Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society : General Session and Parasession on The Grammar of Event Structure, 1991. — Pp. 480—519. find
  31. Varzi Achille. Mereology [Electronic resource] / Achille Varzi // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. — Access mode : https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/ mereology. ↗
  32. Vendler Z. Linguistics in philosophy / Z. Vendler. — Cornell University Press, 1967. — 203 p. find
  33. Verkerk A. Where do all the motion verbs come from? The speed of development of manner verbs and path verbs in Indo-European / A. Verkerk // Diachronica. — 2015. — V. 32. — № 1. — Pp. 69—104. find
  34. Zlatev J. Polesymy or Generality? / J. Zlatev // Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics / H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven, J. Taylor (eds.). — Mouton de Gruyter, 2003. — Pp. 447—494. O n the S pecificity of E vent A ctualization in an E nglish V erb P hrase H eaded by a V erb of M ovement © Deana A. Axelrood (2020), orcid.org/0000-0001-8353-7070, PhD in Philology, associate professor, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Pyatigorsk State University” (Pyatigorsk, Russia), deaxel@mail.ru. © Maria S. Brodskaya (2020), orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-3451, PhD in Philology, associate professor, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Pyatigorsk State University” (Pyatigorsk, Russia), mashuchok@gmail.com. find

Updated

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/axelrood-2020-specificity-event-actualization-english-verb/