Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2024 / Podcasting and input and output-based language learning of English modal verbs

Podcasting and input and output-based language learning of English modal verbs

Summary

The study asks whether podcasts can teach English modal verbs (EMVs) to Iranian intermediate EFL learners better than the usual rule-first, paper-and-pencil drills. It also asks how this fits the debate on whether learners gain more from receiving language (input) or producing it (output). The authors ran a quasi-experiment with pre-test, post-test and a control group. They screened 193 students at Islamic Azad University (Rasht) with the Oxford Quick Placement Test and kept 157 comparable learners. These were split into five experimental groups and one control group. The experimental groups heard six podcast episodes in which modals occur naturally in conversation rather than being explained as rules. Each group then did either input-based follow-up work, such as comprehension tasks, or output-based work, such as speaking tasks. The control group did traditional drills. Post-test gains in EMV knowledge were statistically significant and favourable for the podcast conditions. The authors argue that grammar can be learned through context and discovery instead of memorisation, provided the follow-up activities are well designed.

Key points

  • Design: quasi-experimental, with pre-test, post-test and a control group. Pre-test and post-test used the same EMV items, but in a different order to reduce practice effects.
  • Sample: 193 students were screened with the Oxford Quick Placement Test, and 157 were kept. They formed five experimental groups (n=26 each) and one control group (n=27).
  • Treatment: six podcast episodes with modals embedded in dialogue. Follow-up practice was either input-based (comprehension) or output-based (speaking). The control group used deductive paper-and-pencil exercises.
  • Result: podcast-based instruction gave a significant improvement in EMV knowledge. The authors stress that the design of follow-up tasks drives much of the benefit. They recommend combining podcasts with Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT).
  • Limitations: notable participant dropout and a single-university Iranian sample. Podcast formats (interview, narrative, conversational) were not compared, and long-term retention was not tested.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. The same test items were reused before and after treatment, but reordered, so gains are less likely to come from recall of the sequence. This is a cheap control against memorisation. — For Mova (learn): Evaluation suites could be rerun with items or sentence order shuffled, as a negative control showing that a score improvement is real and not an artefact of fixed ordering.
  • I2. Modals were taught by placing them inside natural conversations rather than through rule lists, so learners infer each meaning from the situation. — For Mova (frames): A small dialogue set where can/must/may/should mark permission, obligation, ability or possibility could test whether prag assigns modal force from context, not from the word alone.
  • I3. The study separates receptive practice (comprehension) from productive practice (speaking) on the same target structure and compares their effects. This checks whether understanding and producing a form develop together. — For Mova (back): Modal handling could be scored on both directions, reading modals into the meaning graph and generating them back. A mismatch between the two scores would locate where modality is lost.
  • I4. Participants were first filtered with a placement test, so the compared groups started from a similar level. Without this, method differences could be masked by baseline differences. — For Mova (learn): Before comparing parser or reader variants, the test texts could be stratified by difficulty, so that differences reflect the method rather than an uneven mix of easy and hard inputs.
  • I5. The authors conclude that identical source material yields different gains depending on the task that follows it. — For Mova (answer): The same fable or school text could be paired with several question types, such as factual recall, modal inference and paraphrase, to see which reasoning step actually fails.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

Fields: Linguistics & languages

Cite

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.22126/tale.2024.10654.1037

@inproceedings{alipour2024podcasting,
  title = {{Podcasting and input and output-based language learning of English modal verbs}},
  author = {Alipour, Somayieh and Bazargani, Davood Taghipour and Ahangari, Saeideh},
  booktitle = {Technology Assisted Language Education 2},
  year = {2024},
  doi = {10.22126/tale.2024.10654.1037},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.22126/tale.2024.10654.1037}
}

References

53 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Abdous, M. H., Camarena, M. M., & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21(1), 76-95. find
  2. Abdulrahman, T., Basalama, N., & Widodo, M. R. (2018). The Impact of Podcasts on EFL Students’ Listening Comprehension. International Journal of Language Education, 2(2), 23-33. find
  3. Adams-Chapman, I. (2006). Neurodevelopmental outcome of the late preterm infant. Clinics in perinatology, 33(4), 947–964. find
  4. Al-Jarf, R. (2023). Grammar Podcasts for ESL College Students. Online Submission, 2(2), 36–43. find
  5. Andersen, R. H., & Dau, S. (2020, October). The Potential of Podcasts as a Learning Medium in Higher Education. In European Conference on e-Learning (Vol. 2020, pp. 16–22). Academic Conferences and Publishing International. find
  6. Asoodar, M., Marandi, S. S., Vaezi, S., & Desmet, P. (2016). Podcasting in a virtual English for academic purposes course: Learner motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 875-896. find
  7. Asyifah, D. A., & Indriani, L. (2021). The student perspective: The impact of podcasts on EFL students listening comprehension. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development, 4(2), 127-134. find
  8. Bahrani, T., & Nekoueizadeh, M. (2014). The role of input in second language acquisition. Journal of Advances in Linguistics, 1(1), 1-6. find
  9. Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and language development (pp. 279–362). NewYork: Wiley. find
  10. Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., & Nemeth, K. (2022). Quizlet and podcasts: effects on vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1407-1436. find
  11. Cann, A. J. (2007). Podcasting is dead. Long live video! Bioscience Education, 10(1), 1–4. find
  12. Chaikovska, O. (2020). The impact of podcasts designed through audacity on improving grammar skills. Open educational e-environment of modern university, 8, 1-7. find
  13. Chaves-Yuste, B., & de-la Peña, C. (2023). Podcasts’ effects on the EFL classroom: a socially relevant intervention. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 20. find
  14. Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of second language acquisition. John Wiley & Sons. find
  15. Drew, C. (2017). Edutaining audio: an exploration of education podcast design possibilities. Educational Media International, 54(1), 48-62. find
  16. Elekaei, A., Tabrizi, H. H., & Chalak, A. (2020). Evaluating learners’ vocabulary gain and retention in an e-learning context using vocabulary podcasting tasks: a case study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(2), 190-203. find
  17. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2014). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 194-220). Routledge. find
  18. Guo, Q. (2022). Interlanguage and Its Implications to Second Language Teaching and Learning. Pacific International Journal, 5(4), 08-14. find
  19. Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 10, 331-359. find
  20. Harrington, M. (2004). Commentary: Input Processing as a Theory of Processing Input. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and Commentary. (pp. 81-94). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. find
  21. Harris, H., & Park, S. (2008). Educational usages of podcasting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 548. find
  22. Hasan, M. M., & Hoon, T. B. (2013). Podcast applications in language learning: A review of recent studies. English language teaching, 6(2), 128-135. find
  23. Heilesen, S. B. (2010). What is the academic efficacy of podcasting?. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1063-1068. find
  24. Ibrahim, A. (2022). The Positive Impact of Using Podcasts in Education in El Baha University College of Science and Arts Elmikhwa Branch. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 7(4), 324-328. find
  25. Iranmanesh, H., & Motallebikia, S. M. (2015). Teaching Modal Verbs: Task-based vs. traditional approaches. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3(11), 39-46. find
  26. Kawaguchi, S. (2021). Second Language Acquisition and Digital Learning in Asia. Asiatic: IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature, 15(1), 36-52. find
  27. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. find
  28. Kreidler, C. (1999). Introducing English Semantics. find
  29. Routledge Leech, G. (2004). Meaning and the English verb. Longman. find
  30. Mashhadi, A., Hayati, M., & Jalilifar, A. (2016). The Impact of Podcasts on English Vocabulary Development in a Blended Educational Model. Applied Research on English Language, 5(2), 145-172. find
  31. McBride, K. (2009). Podcasts and second language learning. Electronic Discourse in Language Learning and Language teaching, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 153-167. find
  32. Moss, N. D., O’Connor, E. L., & White, K. M. (2010). Psychosocial predictors of the use of enhanced podcasting in student learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 302-309. find
  33. Nagata, N. (1998). Input vs. output practice in educational software for second language acquisition, Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 23-40. find
  34. Nam, E. (1975). Child and adult perceptual strategies in second language acquisition. Paper presented at the 1975 TESOL Convention, Los Angeles. find
  35. Nason, P. (2005). Is Podcasting the New Radio?. Washington Times, 7. find
  36. Rassaei, E. (2012). The effects of input-based and output-based instruction on L2 development. Tesl-Ej, 16(3), n3. find
  37. Razaghi, A., Faruji, L. F., & Salehi, M. (2022). Audio Podcast Retelling versus Corpus-Based Learning and Vocabulary Knowledge Development of English Language Learners. Anatolian Journal of Education, 7(1), 181-196. find
  38. Samad, I. A., Bustari, A., & Ahmad, D. (2017). The use of podcasts in improving students’ speaking skill. Journal of English Language and Education, 3(2), 97-111. find
  39. Scutter, S., Stupans, I., Sawyer, T., & King, S. (2010). How do students use podcasts to support learning? Australasian journal of educational technology, 26(2). find
  40. Saeedakhtar, A., Haqju, R., & Rouhi, A. (2021). The impact of collaborative listening to podcasts on high school learners’ listening comprehension and vocabulary learning. System, 101, 102588. find
  41. Selingo, J. (2006). Students and teachers, from K to 12, hit the podcasts. New York Times, G4. find
  42. Stanley, G. (2006). Podcasting: Audio on the Internet Comes of Age. T E S L -E J , 9(4), 1-7. Retrieved from https://tesl-ej.org/ej36/int.pdf ↗
  43. Suseno, E. (2024). Using Podcast Material to Modify Foreign Words and Expressions to Improve EFL Learners’ Speaking Abilities. Linguistics Initiative, 4(1), 16-29. find
  44. Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies in child language development (pp. 175-208). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. find
  45. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford University Press. find
  46. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 497-516). Boston, MA: pearson. find
  47. VanPatten, B. (1984). Learners’ comprehension of clitic pronouns: More evidence for a word order strategy. Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 57-67. find
  48. VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755-803. find
  49. VanPatten, B. (2003). From input to output: A teacher’s guide to second language acquisition. New York: McGraw-Hill. find
  50. Yanmin, W., & Yi, P. (2019). A Review of the Application and Development of Output Hypothesis Theory in Foreign Language Teaching. IRA International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies, 15(3), 88. find
  51. Zhang, S. (2009). The Role of Input, Interaction and Output in the Development of Oral Fluency. English language teaching, 2(4), 91-100. find
  52. Zauche, L. H., Thul, T. A., Mahoney, A. E. D., & Stapel-Wax, J. L. (2016). Influence of language nutrition on children’s language and cognitive development: An integrated review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 318-333. find
  53. Zydney, J. M., Warner, Z., & Angelone, L. (2020). Learning through experience: Using design based research to redesign protocols for blended synchronous learning environments. Computers & Education, 143, 103678 find

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/alipour-2024-podcasting-input-output-based-language/