Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / 2024 / Teaching an Arabic Dialect to Non-Native Learner in the Mid-Fifteenth Century Case Study: Al-Balāṭī Manuscript

Teaching an Arabic Dialect to Non-Native Learner in the Mid-Fifteenth Century Case Study: Al-Balāṭī Manuscript

Summary

The paper examines Tercüme-i Hediyye-i Hassân ("The Interpretation of Ḥassān's Gift"), a manuscript by the Ottoman author Ḥassān ibn Naṣūḥ ar-Rūmī al-Balāṭī from around 1445. It was written to teach spoken Arabic, mainly a northern Syrian dialect, to Turkish speakers planning to travel in Arab lands. The authors analyse the Ottoman Turkish copy held in Ankara (Text#1) and set it against a Persian-medium version (Text#2). They look at the author's stated motives and at how the book handles grammar, cultural content, topic choice and dialect mixing.

Al-Balāṭī deliberately sets aside the rule-based grammatical teaching common in his time. He teaches phrases inside everyday dialogues, translates them into Turkish, and finishes with a glossary grouped by topic. The paper presents this as an early, rough form of communicative teaching that responds to learners' practical needs. The manuscript also blends Syrian (Aleppo/Euphrates), Iraqi and Egyptian features with Fuṣḥā and shows some transfer from Turkish. This makes it a historical record of both Arabic dialects and fifteenth-century Anatolian Turkish.

Key points

  • Three known copies:
    • Ankara National Library A4870 (Text#1, Ottoman Turkish, the main source).
    • An incomplete Ottoman copy at Ankara University Library, Mustafa Cön Section, A349.
    • A Persian-medium copy at Istanbul University, FY 01153 (Text#2), dated 850/1445–1446.
  • Copying record: the approved copy notes it was copied in Aleppo in 956/1549–1550.
  • Physical form of Text#1:
    • 43 leaves in careful Naskh script.
    • Arabic is written in red and Turkish in black.
    • A catchword at the foot of each page links it to the next.
  • Version comparison: comparing Text#1 and Text#2 produced over 2000 observations. The versions adapt localized content, for example replacing "Turkish" with "Persian" and "a Bedouin Turk" with "a man".
  • Teaching content:
    • The introduction discusses language immersion, the role of translators, social differences in speech (farmer, Bedouin, judge), and why dialect is taught rather than Fuṣḥā.
    • The body lists verb conjugations form by form, each with a Turkish gloss.

Interesting ideas

  • I1. Teach language through phrases placed in concrete everyday situations rather than through abstract rules, because the situation itself carries the meaning. — For Mova (answer): Group test items for the readers by situation (market, travel, prayer, greeting) so that comprehension failures can be traced to specific scene types.
  • I2. Present each paradigm one form at a time, with person and number made explicit by a gloss next to it (e.g. ʕaraftu / ʕarafnā / ʕarafta …). — For Mova (tokens): Build full paradigm tables with per-cell glosses as regression tests for the English morphology and lemmatizer, checking every inflected cell rather than sampled tokens.
  • I3. Tie speech varieties to social roles such as farmer, Bedouin and judge, so the learner sees that the same content is expressed differently depending on who speaks. — For Mova (frames): Add a speaker-register attribute to speech-act frames, so that the choice of politeness or formality can be explained by the role of the speaker.
  • I4. Two versions of one text differ mainly where culture-specific references were swapped for the target audience, so diffing parallel versions isolates the localized parts. — For Mova (back): When translating through the meta-world, mark culture-bound entities in the graph so that generation can deliberately substitute or neutralize them, as the Persian version did.
  • I5. End with a vocabulary list grouped by topic, which works as a small domain ontology supporting what the dialogues taught. — For Mova (world): Organize compiled lexical knowledge into situation-based topical clusters that can be matched to the scene a text describes, helping entity typing in the world model.

Our summary of the paper, in our own words — not its text. The work belongs to its authors; read it at the links above.

Fields: Linguistics & languages

Cite

The paper itself, not this page. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. DOI 10.24425/for.2024.152387

@inproceedings{alhamad2024teaching,
  title = {{Teaching an Arabic Dialect to Non-Native Learner in the Mid-Fifteenth Century Case Study: Al-Balāṭī Manuscript}},
  author = {Al-Hamad, Muntasir Fayez and Benli, Ali},
  booktitle = {Folia Orientalia 61},
  year = {2024},
  doi = {10.24425/for.2024.152387},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.24425/for.2024.152387}
}

References

17 references, 0 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

  1. Abdellah, Antar, and Abdelbaset Haridy. 2017. ‘Medieval Muslim Thinkers on Foreign Language Pedagogy: The Case of Ibn Khaldun’. Lingua 193: 62–71. ʔArsalān, Zakariyyāʔ. 2016. ʔIbstimūlūǧiyā al-luġa an-naḥwiyya. ʕAmmān: Dār Kunz. find
  2. Baddūḥ, Ḥusayn. 2018. ‘Taʕlīm al-luġa al-ʕarabiyya li-n-nātiqīn bi-ġayrihā min manḏ̣ūr tadāwuliyy’. In Taʕlīm al-luġa al-ʕarabiyya li-n-nātiqīn bi-ġayrihā: Dirāsāt wa-ʔabḥāṯ ʕilmiyya muḥakkama, edited by Balqāsim al-Yūbī et al., 64–77. ʕAmmān: Dār Kunz. al-Balāṭī, Ḥassān. n.d. Tercüme-i Hediyye-i Hassân (Ottoman–Arabic). Ankara: National Library in Ankara, Ref. A4870. al-Balāṭī, Ḥassān. 1445. Tercüme-i Hediyye-i Hassân (Persian–Arabic). Istanbul: Istanbul University Library, Rare Books Section, FY 01153. find
  3. El-Balâtî, Hassân. 2024. Tercüm-i Hediyye-i Hassân: Diyaloglarla Arap Lehçeleri Öğretimi, edited by Ali Benli and Muntasir Al-Hamad. Istanbul: T.C. Türkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Başkanliği. find
  4. Boyacioğlu, Fuat. 2015. ‘The Historical Development of the Foreign Language Education in Ottoman Empire’. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 174: 651–657. find
  5. Emecen, Feridun. 1992. ‘Balat’. In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, 5:4–7. İstan-bul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Y. European Council. 2020. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Strasburg: European Council. al-Ǧāḥiḏ̣, ʕAmr. 2013. Al-Bayān wa-at-tabyīn. 3 vols. Edited by Darwīš Ǧuwaydī. Bayrūt: Al-Maktaba al-ʕAṣriyya. find
  6. Kātib Celebī, Mustafa. 1941. Kašf aḏ̣-ḏ̣unūn ʕan ʔasāmī al-kutub wa-al-funūn. Edited by Mehmed Şerefettin Yaltkaya and Rifat Bele. Ankara: Ministry of Education Press. al-Hamad, Muntasir. 2020. ‘The QARA’A: Defining a Group in Learning Arabic as a Foreign Language’. Romano-Arabica 20: 33–41. al-Ḥamad, Muntaṣir, and Ḥāfiḏ̣ ʕAlawī. 2016. ‘ʔAġlāṭ naql al-qudra ʕinda mutaʕalllimī al-ʕarabiyya luġa ṯāniya’. Linguistica Communicatio 18 (1–2): 103–136. al-Hamad, Muntasir, and Yehia Mohamed. 2020. ‘An Orthographic Phonological-Based Error Analysis of the Arabic of English-Speaking Learners’. The Language Scholar 6: 8–25. al-Hassani, Salim. 2012. 1001 Inventions: The Enduring Legacy of Muslim Civilization. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society. find
  7. Hazer, Dursun. 2002. ‘Osmanlı Medreselerinde Arapça Öğretimi ve Okutulan Ders Kitapları’. Gazi Üniversitesi Çorum İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 1: 274–293. Ibn Ḫaldūn, ʕAbd ar-Raḥmān. 2013. Muqaddima Ibn Ḫaldūn. Edited by Darwīš Ǧuwaydī. Bayrūt: Al-Maktaba al-ʕAṣriyya. find
  8. İpşirli, Mehmet. 2015. ‘Sultan II. Murad Devri İlim ve Kültür Hayatı Üzerine Değerlendir-meler’. In Sultan II. Murad ve Dönemi, edited by İsmail Yaşayanlar, 129–138. Bursa: Gaye Kitabevi. Lugat, Milli Kütüphane. National Library Adnan Ötüken Manuscripts Collection, no. 3630/2, fol. 32a–34b. Maʕtūq, ʔAḥmad. 2005. Naḏ̣ariyyat al-luġa aṯ-ṯāniya. Ad-Dār al-Bayḍāʔ: Al-Markaz aṯ-Ṯaqāfiyy al-ʕArabiyy. find
  9. Mete, Zekai. 2004. ‘Menteşe’. In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, 29:150–152. Ankara: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı. Mükāleme ve Lügat. Selimiye Library Manuscripts Collection, no. 2094, fol. 14a–16b. Naǧm, ʔAḥmad. 2021. Al-Taʕlīm fī ad-dawla al-ʕuṯmāniyya. Al-Qāhira: Arkan for Studies Research and Publishing. find
  10. Osman, Ghada. 2003. ‘The Historian on Language: Ibn Khaldun and the Communicative Learning Approach’. Middle East Studies Association Bulletin 37 (1): 50–57. find
  11. Ryding, Karin. 2013. Teaching and Learning Arabic as a Foreign Language. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. aš-Šarqāwī, Muḥammad. 2013. Al-Futḥāt al-luġawiyya. Bayrūt: Dār at-Tanwīr. find
  12. Topuz, Gülşah. 2019. Osmanlı Türkçesi Devri Çok Dilli Sözlüklerinden Lugat-i Erba‘a (Arapça–Farsça Türkçe–Yunanca). İstanbul: İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. find
  13. Versteegh, Kees. 2006. ‘History of Arabic Language Teaching’. In Handbook for Arabic Language Teaching Professionals in the 21st Century, edited by Kassem Wahba et al., 3–12. New York: Routledge. find
  14. Versteegh, Kees. 2014. The Arabic Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. find
  15. Wahba, Kassem. 2006. ‘Arabic Language Use and the Educated Language User’. In Handbook for Arabic Language Teaching Professionals in the 21st Century, edited by Kassem Wahba et al., 139–156. New York: Routledge. find
  16. Wilmsen, David. 2006. ‘What is Communicative Arabic’. In Handbook for Arabic Language Teaching Professionals in the 21st Century, edited by Kassem Wahba et al., 125–138. New York: Routledge. find
  17. Zwartjes, Otto, and Manfred Woidich. 2012. ‘Damascus Arabic According to the Compendio of Lucas Caballero (1709)’. In Middle Arabic and Mixed Arabic: Diachrony and Synchrony, edited by Liesbeth Zack and Arie Schippers, 295–334. Leiden: Brill. find

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/al-2024-hamad-teaching-arabic-dialect-non-native/