Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / papers / Learning Accurate, Compact, and Interpretable… / cited by

Who cites «Learning Accurate, Compact, and Interpretable Tree Annotation»

455 papers of our library cite it (of the 141,840 whose bibliographies we read) · 46 with a page here, the most cited first · ← back to «Learning Accurate, Compact, and Interpretable Tree Annotation»

  1. Attention Is All You NeedarXiv:1706.03762Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, et al.2017 · 16,593 citations
  2. Universal Stanford dependencies: A cross-linguistic typologyMarie-Catherine de Marneffe, Timothy Dozat, Natalia Silveira, et al.2014 · 627 citations
  3. Open Domain Targeted SentimentConference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)Margaret Mitchell, Jacqui Aguilar, Theresa Wilson, et al.2013 · 268 citations
  4. Better Arabic Parsing: Baselines, Evaluations, and AnalysisSpence Green, Christopher D. Manning2010 · 232 citations
  5. BART: A Modular Toolkit for Coreference ResolutionAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Yannick Versley, Simone Paolo Ponzetto, Massimo Poesio, et al.2008 · 197 citations
  6. Learning to Translate with Source and Target SyntaxDavid Chiang2010 · 173 citations
  7. Parsing to Stanford Dependencies: Trade-offs between Speed and AccuracyDaniel Cer, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Dan Jurafsky, et al.2010 · 158 citations
  8. Parser Showdown at the Wall Street Corral: An Empirical Investigation of Error Types in Parser OutputJonathan K. Kummerfeld, David Hall, James R. Curran, et al.2012 · 127 citations
  9. "cba to check the spelling": Investigating Parser Performance on Discussion Forum PostsJennifer Foster2010 · 94 citations
  10. Which Linguist Invented the Lightbulb? Presupposition Verification for Question-AnsweringNajoung Kim, Ellie Pavlick, Burcu Karagol Ayan, et al.2021 · 63 citations
  11. BART: A Multilingual Anaphora Resolution SystemInternational Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval)Samuel Broscheit, Massimo Poesio, Simone Paolo Ponzetto, et al.2010 · 55 citations
  12. Parser Evaluation over Local and Non-Local Deep Dependencies in a Large CorpusEmily M. Bender, Dan Flickinger, Stephan Oepen, et al.2011 · 53 citations
  13. An Empirical Comparison of Parsing Methods for Stanford DependenciesLingpeng Kong, Noah A. Smith2014 · 39 citations
  14. Word Segmentation, Unknown-word Resolution, and Morphological Agreement in a Hebrew Parsing SystemYoav Goldberg, Michael Elhadad2013 · 39 citations
  15. Joint Hebrew Segmentation and Parsing using a PCFGLA Lattice ParserYoav Goldberg, Michael Elhadad2011 · 32 citations
  16. Does Universal Dependencies need a parsing representation? An investigation of EnglishNatalia Silveira, Christopher Manning2015 · 24 citations
  17. The Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English: First Parsing Results and AnalysisSeth Kulick, Anthony Kroch, Beatrice Santorini2014 · 24 citations
  18. Tree-distance and some other variants of evalbMartin Emms2008 · 24 citations
  19. Parsing Noun Phrases in the Penn TreebankDavid Vadas, James R. Curran2011 · 23 citations
  20. Modeling Morphosyntactic Agreement in Constituency-Based Parsing of Modern HebrewReut Tsarfaty, Khalil Sima'an2010 · 21 citations
  21. Morphological Features for Parsing Morphologically-rich Languages: A Case of ArabicJon Dehdari, Lamia Tounsi, Josef van Genabith2011 · 19 citations
  22. Parser Evaluation and the BNC: Evaluating 4 constituency parsers with 3 metricsJennifer Foster, Josef van Genabith2008 · 18 citations
  23. Parsing Any Domain English text to CoNLL dependenciesSudheer Kolachina, Prasanth Kolachina2012 · 6 citations
  24. Learning synchronous context-free grammars with multiple specialised non-terminals for hierarchical phrase-based translationFelipe Sanchez-Martinez, Juan Antonio Perez-Ortiz, Rafael C. Carrasco2020

409 more papers of our library cite it; they have no page here yet.

↑ back to top

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/papers/petrov-2006-learning-accurate-compact-interpretable-tree/cited-by/