Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / concepts / PRON: pronoun

🏷️ PRON: pronoun

Universal Dependencies · 7 key papers · all concepts

Part of: 🗨️ Natural language processing · 🌐 Universal Dependencies

PRON is the universal part-of-speech tag for pronouns in Universal Dependencies. It covers words that stand in for a noun or a noun phrase and get their reference from context, such as I, she, who, nothing or themselves.

Also: pronoun, pron, UPOS PRON

What it is

In Universal Dependencies, every syntactic word receives one tag from a closed list of 17 universal parts of speech (Nivre et al. 2020). PRON is one of them. The guidelines describe a pronoun by what it does. It takes the place of a nominal, and its meaning comes from the discourse or the situation, not from a fixed concept. This textbook view goes back to traditional grammar.

The class is meant to include:

Borderline cases

The tag sits next to several other tags, and the boundaries are where most errors happen.

Features

Pronouns usually carry more morphological features (FEATS) than any other class:

UD v2 added features that matter mostly for pronouns. Polite marks formal address, and Clusivity marks inclusive versus exclusive "we" (Nivre et al. 2020).

Relations

As heads of nominal phrases, pronouns attach mostly as subjects, objects and obliques. In English treebanks, nsubj is far ahead of every other relation, followed by obj and nmod, where the nmod cases are mainly possessives. In French, nsubj also leads, but expl and iobj rank much higher. This reflects reflexive "se" and impersonal "il" (expl) and the dative clitics lui and leur (iobj). Pronouns also make up a larger share of all tokens in English than in French.

Examples

Across languages

Languages differ in how often pronouns appear and in what form. In pro-drop languages such as Spanish or Italian, subjects are often left out, so fewer pronoun tokens occur. Japanese words for "I" and "you" behave much like nouns, and treebanks must decide where they belong.

Because UD takes the word as the basic unit, clitic and affixal pronouns are split off as separate tokens even when the spelling joins them (Marneffe et al. 2021). The original token is preserved so the text can be recovered (Nivre et al. 2016). This applies, for example, to Arabic object suffixes and Romance clitics. Case systems in languages such as Russian or German give pronouns rich Case values. Languages with inclusive and exclusive "we", such as Tagalog with tayo and kami, use Clusivity.

In treebanks and research

PRON was already one of the twelve coarse categories proposed by Petrov, Das and McDonald (Petrov et al. 2012). Their set also included NOUN, DET, ADP and others. They mapped 25 treebanks onto it, and the coarse tags supported cross-lingual part-of-speech tagging and delexicalized parser transfer (Petrov et al. 2012).

UD v1 extended that inventory to 17 tags. It took its morphological features from Interset (Nivre et al. 2016). Interset is a feature interlingua that converts tagsets through per-tagset decoders and encoders (Zeman 2008).

The PRON/DET boundary in particular varies between treebanks of a single language. This has led to work on annotation consistency (Marneffe et al. 2017). One proposal compares UPOS trigram distributions between two treebanks A and B (Aggarwal & Zeman 2020):

θpos(A,B) = KLcpos3(A,B) + KLcpos3(B,A)

KLcpos3 is an asymmetric Kullback–Leibler divergence over UPOS-tag trigrams. Adding both directions gives a symmetric score θpos. A pair of treebanks counts as consistent when θpos stays below a threshold that depends on genre. The threshold is 0.5 for treebanks of the same genre (Aggarwal & Zeman 2020).

Pronouns also matter outside tagging. They are central to coreference resolution and dependency parsing, since a correct PRON tag and its features help a system link a pronoun to the entity it refers to.

How often the tag PRON occurs: its share of all tokens

Counted by code over the Universal Dependencies 2.18 treebanks of English and French (every token once, subtypes with their base relation).

How often the tag PRON occurs: its share of all tokensEnglish treebanks: 10.98% of tokens (123,635 tokens)English treebanks10.98% of tokens (123,635 tokens)French treebanks: 7.98% of tokens (87,046 tokens)French treebanks7.98% of tokens (87,046 tokens)
The numbers
TreebanksShare
English treebanks10.98% of tokens (123,635 tokens)
French treebanks7.98% of tokens (87,046 tokens)

The relations PRON words take most often

The five most frequent in each language's treebanks, by tokens.

The relations PRON words take most oftenEnglish: nsubj: 72,645English: nsubj72,645English: obj: 17,084English: obj17,084English: nmod: 16,314English: nmod16,314English: obl: 5,346English: obl5,346English: expl: 3,382English: expl3,382French: nsubj: 41,558French: nsubj41,558French: obj: 13,990French: obj13,990French: expl: 10,146French: expl10,146French: obl: 9,001French: obl9,001French: iobj: 6,703French: iobj6,703
The numbers
PairTokens
English: nsubj72,645
English: obj17,084
English: nmod16,314
English: obl5,346
English: expl3,382
French: nsubj41,558
French: obj13,990
French: expl10,146
French: obl9,001
French: iobj6,703

Key papers

The works this page cites, the most cited first; citations as counted by OpenAlex plus the papers of this library that cite the work, read 2026-10-24.

More papers

Topics: 🔤 Part-of-speech tagging · 🌐 Universal Dependencies

Shelves: 🗣️ Language and Linguistics

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/upos-pron/