Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / concepts / compound: compound

🌐 compound: compound

Universal Dependencies · 6 key papers · all concepts

Part of: 🗨️ Natural language processing · 🌐 Universal Dependencies

compound is the Universal Dependencies relation that links two or more words forming a single lexical unit, such as a noun–noun compound, a verb with its particle, or a serial verb, when that unit is written as separate words and none of the parts is a modifier, argument or function word of the others.

Also: compound:prt, compound:svc, compound:lvc, compound:redup, noun compound, nn (Stanford Dependencies)

What it is

In Universal Dependencies (UD), the word is the basic unit of annotation, following the principle of lexical integrity (Marneffe et al. 2021). Many languages build complex lexical items from several words, and the spaces between them do not make the items any less word-like. The compound relation records this situation. It says that two syntactic words together form one lexeme-like unit, rather than one word governing a dependent phrase.

The head is the part that carries the category and the core meaning of the whole. The dependent is the part that narrows it. In English noun compounds the head is normally the rightmost noun, so in phone book the dependent phone attaches to book. The whole compound then takes its outer relation (nsubj, obj, obl and so on) from the head.

compound is one of the 37 universal relation types of UD v2. Languages may refine these types with subtypes but may not invent new basic categories (Nivre et al. 2020). It replaced the narrower nn label of earlier Stanford-style annotation. The cross-linguistic inventory itself came out of universal Stanford dependencies (Marneffe et al. 2014; Nivre et al. 2016).

Neighbouring relations

compound is one of three multiword relations in UD, and the three are kept apart:

RelationInternal structureTypical cases
compoundheaded; head is the semantic coreice cream, pick up
flatheadless; first word is a formal headnames (Marie Curie), dates
fixedgrammaticalized function expressionbecause of, as well as

compound is also distinct from amod and nmod. A noun that is a genuine modifying phrase, often marked by case or an adposition, takes nmod rather than compound. An adjective that remains a free modifier takes amod.

Common subtypes

Examples

She bought a phone book.          compound(book, phone)
They finally gave up the plan.    compound:prt(gave, up)
The customs office opened late.   compound(office, customs)

In the first and third sentences the dependent noun narrows the reference of the head noun without being a separate argument. In the second, up is not an adposition introducing a phrase: it belongs to the verb's lexical meaning, so it attaches as compound:prt. Compare They walked up the hill, where up introduces an oblique phrase and is marked case. Such phrasal verbs are a classic topic of multiword expressions.

Across languages

How often compound appears depends heavily on orthography and morphology.

In English, compounds are usually written with spaces, so the relation is frequent. Noun-on-noun attachments dominate its use. Proper-noun sequences and nouns attached to proper names come next. Verb-to-adposition links are also very common, and they reflect particles labelled compound:prt.

In French, the relation is rare. Most lexicalized combinations either take a preposition (machine à laver) and are analysed with nmod, or are hyphenated and treated as single tokens. What remains is almost entirely noun–noun.

German, Dutch and the Nordic languages write most nominal compounds as one orthographic word, which leaves little for the relation to mark. Their separable verb prefixes, however, use compound:prt. Serial verb languages of West Africa and Southeast Asia make heavy use of compound:svc. Because subtypes can be added per language, language-specific facts can be captured while the universal label stays comparable (Nivre et al. 2020).

In treebanks and research

The boundary between compound, flat, fixed and nmod is one of the less stable parts of UD annotation. Treebanks of the same language can label similar sequences differently. Work on annotation consistency has examined such variation across UD corpora (Marneffe et al. 2017). Tutorials on UD principles treat the multiword relations as a recurring source of annotator questions (Zeman 2021). Recent work on constructions and strategies in UD gives a framework for deciding which grammatical strategy a language uses for a given construction (Nivre 2025).

For dependency parsing, compound matters because long noun sequences are a classic source of attachment errors. UD treebanks underlay the CoNLL shared tasks of 2017 and 2018 on parsing raw text in many languages (Marneffe et al. 2021; Nivre et al. 2020). Applications that extract relations between content words often prefer graph representations. The enhanced English UD converters, for example, refine labels and treat certain multiword units as single nodes so that content words are linked directly (Schuster & Manning 2016). Recognizing a compound as one unit therefore helps downstream tasks such as information extraction and term detection in treebanks and raw text alike.

How often the relation compound occurs: its share of all tokens

Counted by code over the Universal Dependencies 2.18 treebanks of English and French (every token once, subtypes with their base relation).

How often the relation compound occurs: its share of all tokensEnglish treebanks: 2.79% of tokens (31,445 tokens)English treebanks2.79% of tokens (31,445 tokens)French treebanks: 0.01% of tokens (145 tokens)French treebanks0.01% of tokens (145 tokens)
The numbers
TreebanksShare
English treebanks2.79% of tokens (31,445 tokens)
French treebanks0.01% of tokens (145 tokens)

What compound joins: the most frequent head tag → dependent tag

The five most frequent in each language's treebanks, by tokens.

What compound joins: the most frequent head tag → dependent tagEnglish: NOUN → NOUN: 16,872English: NOUN → NOUN16,872English: PROPN → PROPN: 3,821English: PROPN → PROPN3,821English: VERB → ADP: 3,690English: VERB → ADP3,690English: NOUN → PROPN: 3,121English: NOUN → PROPN3,121English: VERB → ADV: 904English: VERB → ADV904French: NOUN → NOUN: 133French: NOUN → NOUN133French: ADP → NOUN: 3French: ADP → NOUN3French: NOUN → ADP: 3French: NOUN → ADP3French: PROPN → PROPN: 3French: PROPN → PROPN3French: NOUN → ADJ: 2French: NOUN → ADJ2
The numbers
PairTokens
English: NOUN → NOUN16,872
English: PROPN → PROPN3,821
English: VERB → ADP3,690
English: NOUN → PROPN3,121
English: VERB → ADV904
French: NOUN → NOUN133
French: ADP → NOUN3
French: NOUN → ADP3
French: PROPN → PROPN3
French: NOUN → ADJ2

Key papers

The works this page cites, the most cited first; citations as counted by OpenAlex plus the papers of this library that cite the work, read 2026-10-24.

More papers

Topics: 🌐 Universal Dependencies · 🌳 Dependency parsing

Shelves: 🗣️ Language and Linguistics

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/concepts/ud-compound/