Elamur Research⌕
☰
home / authors / Dan Roth / page 2

Dan Roth · page 2

64 papers in our library · 2002–2026 · page 2 of 3

The profile, affiliations and co-authors →

 Papers

The most cited first (OpenAlex and our library).

1 2 3

  1. Zero-shot Event Extraction via Transfer Learning: Challenges and Insights (2021 · 128 citations)
    Event extraction (EE) usually depends on costly supervised annotation tied to a fixed event ontology. This paper tests whether EE can be done with no event training data at all. The authors reuse off-the-shelf pretrained models built for other tasks. Trigger detection is posed as Textual Entailment or Yes/No QA…
  2. Grammar Error Correction in Morphologically Rich Languages: The Case of Russian (2019 · 126 citations)
    Research on grammar error correction (GEC) has focused almost entirely on English, where systems rely on tens of millions of words of annotated learner text.
  3. Solving Hard Coreference Problems (2015 · 118 citations)
    Coreference systems still struggle with pronouns, especially in Winograd-style sentences. In these, gender and number agreement offer no help, and picking the right antecedent depends on world knowledge. Peng, Khashabi and Roth propose Predicate Schemas, a knowledge representation organized around predicates:
  4. A Statistical Analysis of Summarization Evaluation Metrics Using Resampling Methods (2021 · 117 citations)
    Automatic summarization metrics are usually judged by how well their scores correlate with human quality ratings.
  5. TwoWingOS: A Two-Wing Optimization Strategy for Evidential Claim Verification (2018 · 114 citations)
    The paper tackles evidential claim verification: given a claim and a large text collection, a system must find the sentences that support or refute the claim and then decide whether the claim is supported, refuted, or lacks enough information.
  6. ExpertQA: Expert-Curated Questions and Attributed Answers (2024 · 113 citations)
    LLMs are increasingly used by specialists, but it is unclear how factual their answers are and how well their citations hold up in specific professional fields, especially high-risk ones like medicine and law.
  7. “Ask Not What Textual Entailment Can Do for You...” (2010 · 108 citations)
    The paper argues that Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE) should become a shared testbed for the component tasks of NLP, such as NER, coreference and parsing.
  8. The Illinois-Columbia System in the CoNLL-2014 Shared Task (2014 · 94 citations)
    This paper presents the Illinois-Columbia entry to the CoNLL-2014 shared task on correcting grammatical mistakes in essays by non-native English writers.
  9. CogCompTime: A Tool for Understanding Time in Natural Language (2018 · 93 citations)
    CogCompTime is a publicly available system for extracting temporal information from raw English text. It covers two tasks. The first is finding explicit time expressions (Timexes) and converting them to a standard format. The second is recovering the implicit ordering of events through temporal relations (TempRels).
  10. A Constrained Latent Variable Model for Coreference Resolution (2013 · 81 citations)
    Coreference resolution clusters noun-phrase mentions according to which real-world entity each one denotes.
  11. Modeling Semantic Relations Expressed by Prepositions (2013 · 76 citations)
    Prepositions are highly ambiguous: one preposition can signal many meanings, and many prepositions can signal the same meaning.
  12. A Joint Framework for Coreference Resolution and Mention Head Detection (2015 · 75 citations)
    Coreference systems lose much of their accuracy when they must find mentions in raw text rather than receive gold-annotated ones.
  13. "I'd rather just go to bed": Understanding Indirect Answers (2020 · 72 citations)
    The paper builds Circa, 34,268 pairs of a polar question and an indirect answer (no yes/no words), in ten everyday scenarios, written and labelled by crowd workers.
  14. Learning-based Multi-Sieve Co-reference Resolution with Knowledge (2012 · 72 citations)
    The paper tackles co-reference resolution: deciding which mentions in a text point to the same entity. Many errors come from missing world knowledge, such as not knowing that "Kursk" is a submarine and can therefore be called a "vessel." The authors link mentions to Wikipedia pages using an existing context-sensitive…
  15. A Peek into Token Bias: Large Language Models Are Not Yet Genuine Reasoners (2024 · 64 citations)
    The paper asks whether large language models actually reason logically or mostly react to familiar surface tokens that appear in well-known problem statements.
  16. Inference Protocols for Coreference Resolution (2011 · 50 citations)
    This paper presents Illinois-Coref, the system the University of Illinois submitted to the closed-track competition of CoNLL-2011, a shared task on resolving coreference in OntoNotes-4.0.
  17. CoCoMIC: Code Completion by Jointly Modeling In-file and Cross-file Context (2024 · 45 citations)
    Most code language models complete a file using only the code above the cursor. They ignore definitions elsewhere in the same repository, which matter a great deal in modular projects. Without that information, models invent class methods or call functions with wrong arguments, especially in private, still-developing…
  18. QANom: Question-Answer driven SRL for Nominalizations (2020 · 41 citations)
    QANom extends QA-SRL from verbs to nouns derived from verbs: a noun like proof or increase is questioned with its verb's question templates («What has someone proved?», «Why did something increase?») and answered with spans of the sentence.
  19. DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language Models (2025 · 36 citations)
    The paper argues that alignment learned during training (e.g., RLHF) has two weaknesses. It locks models into a developer's fixed, supposedly universal preferences, and it can be bypassed, for example through jailbreaks. The authors propose DeAL, which moves alignment to inference time. Decoding is treated as an…
  20. PropSegmEnt: A Large-Scale Corpus for Proposition-Level Segmentation and Entailment Recognition (2023 · 31 citations)
    Standard NLI datasets give one entailment label to a whole sentence or paragraph. Most real sentences pack several distinct units of meaning, and each can be true or unsupported independently. A single label therefore hides partial entailment, where only some of a hypothesis is backed by the premise. PropSegmEnt…
  21. Pairwise Representation Learning for Event Coreference (2022 · 31 citations)
    Event coreference resolution decides whether two event mentions describe the same real-world event. Earlier systems usually encoded each mention on its own and then classified the pair. As a result, a mention's vector never reflected its counterpart's context, which is a serious gap when the mentions come from…
  22. Revisiting the Evaluation for Cross Document Event Coreference (2016 · 30 citations)
    Cross document event coreference (CDEC) asks whether event mentions in different documents describe the same real-world event.
  23. Identifying Semitic Roots: Machine Learning with Linguistic Constraints (2008 · 25 citations)
    Semitic words are built from a root (usually three consonants) and a pattern, and the root is hard to recover from unpointed text because of weak paradigms, missing vowels and attached prefixes.
  24. Improving Generalization in Coreference Resolution via Adversarial Training (2019 · 23 citations)
    Neural coreference resolvers trained on CoNLL-2012 may lean on memorized entity names rather than truly generalizing.
  25. Learning Hebrew Roots: Machine Learning with Linguistic Constraints (2004 · 23 citations)
    The root of a Hebrew word (usually three consonants) is hard to find, because vowels are unwritten, particles attach without spaces, and weak roots change their shape.

1 2 3

This page in Markdown → https://md.research.elamur.ai/free/en/authors/dan-roth/page/2/